Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Charles Dharapak/AP/Press Association Images
prime time address

Obama to lay out Islamic State battle plan

The speech will give Obama a chance to redress criticism that he has been slow to respond to IS, amid fears fighters armed with Western passports could hit US targets.

Updated at 23.30

BARACK OBAMA WILL this evening steel Americans for a prolonged battle against the Islamic State, despite devoting much of his presidency to avoiding sapping new entanglements in the Middle East.

His hand has been forced by the radical group’s sudden rise in Syria and Iraq, Obama will use a prime time address tonight to argue that targeted military and an international coalition can defeat IS, before it poses a threat to the US homeland.

But mindful of avoiding what he believes are the mistakes of the last decade, Obama will assure millions of television viewers that he will not send conventional ground troops back to Iraq to fight a group that has beheaded two US journalists.

It remained unclear whether Obama would also use the address on the ceremonial state floor of the White House – where he announced the success of a US operation to kill Osama bin Laden – to signal an expansion of US airstrikes against IS from Iraq into Syria.

The speech will also lack a definitive timeline for US operations against IS, after several reports cited senior officials as saying they could outlast Obama’s presidency, which ends in January 2017. White House spokesman Josh Earnest said,

I think the American people need to expect that this is something that will require a sustained commitment.

The address will come at a poignant time – on the eve of the 13th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, when Islamic radicalism on a mass scale scorched the US homeland for the first time, and drew America into exhausting overseas wars and a still unending anti-terror campaign.

Earnest said Obama would “talk about the risks that the United States faces, and he’ll talk about the strategy that he has put together to confront those risks, to mitigate them, and ultimately to degrade and destroy ISIL,” he said, using an alternative acronym for IS.

But many details of the plan Obama will outline, as he enlists the symbolic weight of a national address at 9:00 pm (0100 GMT Thursday) remain unclear.

Cautious hope

But White House aides say it will be anchored on the cautious hope that Iraq’s new unity government will prove more inclusive than ex-prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, who it blamed for fanning sectarianism that eased Islamic State’s rise.

The president briefed senior congressional leaders on his plan on Tuesday, and an aide to House Speaker John Boehner stirred speculation that he could order US troops back to Iraq on a mission strictly limited to training Iraqi troops and to call in air strikes against IS forces. The aide said:

The speaker stated he would support the president if he chose to deploy the military to help train and play an advisory role for the Iraqi security forces and assist with the lethal targeting of ISIL leadership.

There was no comment from the White House on whether Obama was considering such an idea, after aborting plans for a small contingent of American soldiers to stay on in Iraq after 2011, following a disagreement with the Maliki government.

Obama, who sees ending wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as a centerpiece of his legacy, is also under pressure to announce stepped-up support for moderate rebels of the Free Syrian Army, despite his antipathy to intervening in Syria’s vicious civil war.

Washington wants to ensure that President Bashar al-Assad, who it regards as a war criminal, does not benefit from any power vacuum left in the event that US military action degrades IS.

A White House official said that Obama told congressional leaders on Tuesday that he did not need fresh permission for military action he is planning to take against IS.

Senior lawmakers are divided on whether existing authorizations to act against terror groups cover an expanded campaign against the jihadist group.

Rebel aid

A senior US official however told AFP that Obama told the bipartisan leadership of the House and the Senate that he did need lawmakers to vote on intensifying US training and equipping of moderate Syrian rebels.

Obama previously asked for such authorization in May, and wants action before Congress leaves town within weeks, ahead of midterm elections in November.

The speech will represent a chance for Obama to redress criticism that he has been slow to respond to IS, amid fears fighters armed with Western passports could hit US targets.

Obama dented his credibility two weeks ago when he admitted he did not yet have a strategy to take on IS in Syria.

The president started the work of creating an international coalition to take on IS at the NATO summit last week.

Defense Secretary, Chuck Hagel, has been in the Middle East, and Secretary of State John Kerry arrives in the region today to accelerate Washington’s efforts

Public opinion in the United States meanwhile appears to be shifting in favor of a limited intervention in Syria.

A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll published Tuesday found two-thirds of those asked favored taking on IS.

First published at 07.35 

- © AFP, 2014 

Read: John Kerry travels to Middle East to hold anti-IS talks>

Read: Obama vows US ‘will not be intimidated’ by Islamic State jihadists>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
30
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.