We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

what is offence?

'Anti-Pantigate' bill tabled in the Dáil to stop "the litigious and thin-skinned"

Stephen Donnelly says that he feels broadcasters are already being more cautious as a result of the controversy.

INDEPENDENT TD STEPHEN Donnelly has tabled a bill which aims to remove the the term “offence” from the Broadcasting Act as he believes its inclusion can be used to “gag free speech”.

Donnelly told the Dáil this afternoon that he is introducing the bill in the wake of the Pantigate controversy which he says, along with the current legislation, has already caused broadcasters to “err on the side of caution”.

“I don’t believe people should be censored for saying offensive things, whether or not that offence is reasonably taken or not,” the Wicklow TD told deputies.

The legislation in its current form gags free speech, harms public debate and means broadcasters can be bullied by the litigious and thin-skinned.

The TD referenced the letter from RTÉ’s head of television Glen Killane to staff explaining the rationale behind the station’s payout to the Iona Institute as evidence of how the current rules restrict broadcasters.

The TD said that it has been suggested in the media that Minister for Communications Pat Rabbitte is considering amending the act so that it instead refers to “reasonable offence”. He argued that this would still “hamstring broadcasters” and wants no reference at all to “offence” in the Broadcasting Act.

The private members bill would change the current wording of paragraph (d) of the Broadcasting Act 2009 from:

anything which may reasonably be regarded as causing harm or offence, or as being likely to promote, or incite to, crime or as tending to undermine the authority of the State, is not broadcast by the broadcaster


anything which may reasonably be regarded as causing harm, or as being likely to promote, or incite to, crime or as tending to undermine the authority of the State, is not broadcast by the broadcaster.

Donnelly argues that his suggestion “removes just two words from the Broadcasting Act” and would “immediately fix one of the biggest flaws in the legislation”.

Taoiseach Enda Kenny said that the Government was not opposing the bill’s entrance to the house and would be looked at by Minister Rabbitte.

Read: Priest says Iona Institute didn’t handle homophobia debate well >

Column: RTÉ thinks it played safe on Pantigate, I beg to differ – Damien Kiberd >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.