Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Your Say

Poll: Should cameras be allowed in criminal trials?

Does it help transparency or is it just voyeuristic?

THE SENTENCING OF Karen Buckey’s killer Alexander Pacteau was recorded earlier, for subsequent broadcast by Sky News and online.

Proponents of allowing cameras in courtrooms argue that it helps transparency and exposes poor decisions.

Others say that it is unfair to the victims of crime and their families.

Today’s question is: Should cameras be allowed in criminal trials?

Poll Results:

Yes, trial and sentencing. (2457)

No. (1799)

Yes, but only sentencing. (1083)

Yes, trial and sentencing.
Yes, but only sentencing.
No.

Making a difference

A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can make sure we can keep reliable, meaningful news open to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.

Support us Learn More

Author

Rónán Duffy

Send Tip or Correction View all articles

Your Voice

Readers Comments

Defamation

Damaging the good reputation of someone, slander, or libel.
Racism or Hate speech

An attack on an individual or group based on religion, race, gender, or beliefs.
Trolling or Off-topic

An attempt to derail the discussion.
Inappropriate language

Profanity, obscenity, vulgarity, or slurs.
Spam

Advertising, phishing, scamming, bots, or repetitive posts.
Other