This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 10 July, 2020
Advertisement

Pub owners take FBD Insurance to court over Covid-19 disruption cover

Pub owners claim they are entitled to have consequential losses covered by what they say is an insurable risk.

Image: Shutterstock/Aleksandar Karanov

SEVERAL TEST ACTIONS brought by pub owners over whether their insurance policies with FBD Insurance Plc covers the disruption in their trade caused by Covid-19 have been admitted to the fast track Commercial Court list.

Mr Justice David Barniville was told the there could be as many as 1,000 pubs and bars in the country affected by the dispute which arose after the insurer refused to provide them with cover since the pandemic resulted in the closure of businesses in mid-March.

The pub owners claim that under their policies of insurance taken out with FBD, they are entitled to have their consequential losses covered by what they claim is an insurable risk.

They claim the insurance policy they have taken out with FBD has a clause that states the pub owners will be indemnified if their premises is closed by order of the local or government authority if there are “outbreaks of contagious or infectious diseases on the premises or within 25 miles of same.”

That interpretation is disputed by FBD, who in April informed the pub owners that a pandemic does not fall within the scope of the clause.

The court heard that FBD considers that the closures did not occur as a result of an outbreak of disease at the premises or areas where the pubs are located.

The closures occurred as a result of measures taken at a national level that involved a nationwide closure of business.  

The actions that came before the court on Monday have been taken by Dublin bars Aberken, trading as Sinnotts Bar; Hyper Trust Ltd, trading as The Leopardstown Inn and Inn on Hibernian Way Ltd trading as Lemon & Duke, which were represented in court by Michael Cush SC.

A fourth action has been taken Leinster Overview Concepts Ltd, which trades as Sean’s Bar, in Athlone, Co Westmeath, which is represented by Eoin McCullough SC. 

They all dispute FBD’s refusal to indemnify them, or its stance that the policy of insurance does not cover the Covid-19 pandemic, and claims that the insurer is acting in breach of contract.

In what are separate actions, the pub owners seek various orders and declarations including orders directing FBD Insurance Public Limited Company to indemnify the pubs in respect of the losses they suffered due to their closure following the outbreak of Covid-19.

The also seek declarations from the court including that the pub owners are entitled to an indemnity from FBD under the provisions of their policy of insurance in respect of claims they have made to the insurer.

In a sworn statement to the court, Chris Kelly, a director of Aberken, trading as Sinnotts Bar, in central Dublin, said that company is losing about €30,000 per week due to the closure.

He added that the other pubs within the same group of companies are in a similar position with the insurer. 

Stephen Cooney a director of the company that runs the Leopardstown Inn, which employs 70 staff, said the firm is losing €56,000 per week since it closed.

Noel Anderson, a director of the fir operating the Lemon and Duke, said he feared that the the business could lose in excess of €1 million.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

While pubs can re-open in mid August, he said that there was every likelihood they could be forced to close again if there were more cases of the virus detected, he said.

Mr Justice Barniville admitted all four cases to the fast track commercial court list. There was no objection to the applications.

Paul Gallagher SC for FBD said that there are arbitration clauses in the policies. However FBD was not objecting to a date being set for what were “test cases” being heard.

Counsel accepted that given the large number of pubs involved, it was “in the public interest” that the court issues a judgement in relation to the interpretation of the insurance policy. 

Noting the urgency of the applications by the parties, the judge agreed to fix a hearing date in early October in respect of the actions brought by the owners of Sean’s Bar, Sinnotts, and the Leopardstown Inn.

Those actions will take between six to 12 days to hear, the court heard.

The judge also also adjourned the action regarding the Lemon and Duke to a date next month to allow a mediation in that particular action take place.

Comments are closed for legal reasons. 

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Aodhan O Faolain

Read next:

COMMENTS