We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

bureaucratic tape

Student who missed out on college place because of examiner's mistake calls situation 'an utter disgrace'

Rebecca Carter has been denied a place studying veterinary medicine in UCD because the State Examinations Commission will not hear her appeal until October.

File Photo Leaving Cert Exams Begin This Wednesday. Mark Stedman / Mark Stedman / /

AN 18-YEAR-OLD student whose leaving cert marks were wrongly totted up by an examiner says the error which has denied her a place in veterinary medicine at UCD is an “absolute and utter disgrace”.

Rebecca Carter has brought High Court proceedings against the State Examination Commission (SEC) over its decision not to re-check her results before mid-October, effectively costing her a place at UCD which decides its student allocation by the end of September.

Rebecca, of Castlebridge, Wexford, also seeks an injunction against UCD restraining the college from refusing her a place on the course.

Both the SEC and UCD have opposed the action, which opened before Justice Richard Humphreys today, and denies any wrongdoing in the matter.

Previously the court heard that UCD had agreed not to allocate Rebecca’s potential placing until 30 September allowing the court to deal with her judicial review of decisions to date relating to her exam results.

Opening the case on Tuesday Micheal P O’Higgins SC, with Brendan Hennessy Bl instructed by solicitor Eileen McCabe for Carter, said Rebecca repeated her leaving certificate exams in May 2018 and was just six points short of the required number in the first round of offers for veterinary medicine in UCD.

She was one point short in the second round. She sought a recheck of her business exam script, which revealed that the examiner had wrongly totted up the marks.

Higher grade

Had the error not occurred Rebecca’s final total points would have given her a higher grade in her business paper and she would have surpassed the points required for veterinary medicine.

When the error was uncovered the Commission was contacted and asked to have matters put right so she could take up her place.

She had then been told the Commission could not correct the error until mid-October. If the mistake was not corrected by the start of October she would have to wait until 2019 to commence her chosen course.

Counsel said after the obvious error was discovered it was hoped that “common sense would prevail” and that “bureaucratic tape would be cut”.

Counsel said this was not the case and the SEC and UCD appeared to be blaming each other over the matter, leaving Carter falling between two stools.

O’Higgins said it also appeared that the SEC’s policy is that if the totting up error had appeared on the front cover of the exam script, it could have been rectified outside the normal appeals process.

However this was not possible because the adding up error was inside the paper.

The SEC’s decision, counsel said, is improper and irrational and should be quashed by the court.

‘Worked extremely hard’

Counsel said that Carter had worked extremely hard to get into veterinary medicine, and had attended at UCD with first-year veterinary students.

She said that she has been left without a place on this year’s course and her future career has been put on hold because of “somebody else’s mistake”.

“It is an absolute and utter disgrace that this error has denied me a place in veterinary medicine,” she stated in a court document.

The State Examination Commission, represented by Conor Power SC and Aoife Carroll Bl, denies that it has acted improperly and denies that it has acted irrationally in the matter.

It says that any alleged error can only be corrected through the formal appeals process, and the error cannot be dealt with through the rectification process.

The SEC also denies that it has failed to have sufficient regard for Carter’s rights and adds that the system it operates to deal with errors such as that alleged by her protects the interests of all examination candidates.

Her appeal it says will be fully considered.

The case continues tomorrow.

In adjourning the matter the judge said he hoped to be in a position to rule on the application following the conclusion of submissions tomorrow.

Comments are closed as the case is before the courts

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Aodhan O'Faolain & Ray Managh
Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.