We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.


Three strikes and life: This is Renua's radical policy on crime

Renua’s election manifesto includes a measure that would jail some repeat burglars for life.

RENUA HAS PROPOSED a ‘three strikes rule’ that will result in an automatic mandatory life sentence after a person is convicted of a serious offence for a third time.

The measure is contained in the the party’s general election manifesto which was launched in Dublin today. The 74-page document states:

[Renua] will introduce a three strikes rule for serious criminal offences resulting in a mandatory life sentence on a successful prosecution of the third offence.

The proposal is among the more radical contained in the manifesto and party leader Lucinda Creighton explained:

[Renua] believes the best way to rebuild the confidence of society in policing and justice is by stamping out crime with available policing, tough zero tolerance sentencing for repeat serial offenders and the building of a justice system which will prioritize victims rather than criminals.

Murder already carries a mandatory life sentence in Ireland along with certain other offences including the possession, burglary or importation of drugs with a certain market value with intent to sell or supply. 

But the party is proposing to widen this.

Renua believes that the three strikes and life rule should also be applied to people convicted of the crimes of rape, child sex abuse and burglary.

So, in theory, someone convicted of burglary three times would, on the third conviction, be automatically handed a life sentence.

When asked about this today, the party’s deputy leader Billy Timmins said that Renua was proposing that the Law Reform Commission would examine what constitutes a serious offence and categorise accordingly.

In short, this would indicate that burglary might not necessarily feature as part of the three strikes rule, unless the Law Reform Commission recommends it should be.

The party’s manifesto adds: “Judicial discretion on the application of the three strike rule would only be allowed in exceptional circumstances.”


Creighton was asked if the party’s three strikes approach is “heavy-handed”. Her answer was emphatic:

What we consider to be heavy-handed is the terrorisation of people in their homes across the country.

She cited the elderly and vulnerable who are particularly isolated in parts of rural Ireland, and continued:

Even in my own constituency [Dublin Bay South] crime rates are climbing all the time unfortunately. So it is an urban and a rural problem.

Creighton said the heavy-handedness exists not in her party’s policy but in repeat offenders, claiming that some people with as many as 15 convictions have been able to offend again.

“All of those people should not be on the streets,” she said, describing the party’s approach as being part of a “consistent and tough sentencing agenda”. She added:

We make no apologies for being tough on crime.

What do you think? Would you favour the three strikes rule for offences including burglary? Let us know in the comments. 

Read: Renua wants to abolish the Leaving Cert as we know it

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.