We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

President Donald Trump arriving back at the White House yesterday. Manuel Balce Ceneta

Second whistleblower claims to have first-hand knowledge of Trump's phone call to Ukraine

Reports from the USA say that the legal team representing the first whistleblower is also representing this second person.

A SECOND WHISTLEBLOWER has come forward claiming to have first-hand knowledge of US President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine.

ABC News is reporting that Mark Zaid, the lawyer representing the initial whistleblower who sounded the alarm on the dealings says he is now representing a second whistleblower.

This second person is said to have “first-hand knowledge” of some of the allegations and is a member of the intelligence community. 

This person has spoken to the inspector general on the issue, but they have not spoken to the congressional committees who are conducting the investigation.

The first whistleblower triggered an impeachment enquiry after coming forward.

The initial complaint is believed to concern not only Trump’s call with President Volodymyr Zelensky but also the way that records of the conversation were handled by White House staff, the New York Times reported. 

The whistleblower filed a complaint over the contents of the conversation in August, saying Trump attempted to get a foreign power to interfere in a US election for his own gain.

Trump denied claims he abused his office by repeatedly urging Zelensky to probe his 2020 rival Joe Biden – as confirmed in a call transcript released by the White House.

Trump and his allies claimed the 25 July call contained no evidence of a quid pro quo pressuring Zelensky to probe Biden.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi later announced an impeachment probe, saying that Trump’s actions amounted to a betrayal of his oath of office and of national security. 

On 30 September, Trump said he wanted to meet the anonymous whistleblower. 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel