We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Laura Hutton/
wards of court

Judge says alleged sexual abuse of two children is 'most disturbing evidence' he has seen in 20 years

The children’s foster parents do not want them to be reunited with their biological parents.

THE ALLEGED SEXUAL abuse and brutal treatment of two children, both under the age of 10, was “the most disturbing evidence I have read in 20 years on the bench”, High Court President Justice Peter Kelly said today.

He made the remarks during an application to have the children made wards of court by a couple who had fostered them for four years and who want to stop them being reunited with their biological parents.

After a District Court hearing for a care order relating to the children collapsed after 29 days of evidence, the Child and Family Agency (CFA) has been promoting their reunification with their natural parents.

They have remained in the care of their foster parents with overnight access to their biological parents over the last two months and cannot be identified by order of the court.

Judge Kelly was told in the High Court today that the CFA had carried out “an extraordinarily detailed risk assessment study” before supporting family reunification. The children were to have been reunited with their natural parents next Tuesday.

He said that day of reunification would not now take place as he was of the opinion the status quo should be maintained until another judge of the High Court had fully heard and decided on the wards of court application.

He adjourned the matter until 8 September and said it would be dealt with by the vacation duty judge of the day. He did not believe it would be in any way detrimental to the children not to rejoin their natural parents before that date.

‘Very detrimental’ 

Judge Kelly said the children, on the evidence he had read, would be going back into a situation that would be very detrimental to them. He had concerns with regard to a suggestion that the natural parents have overnight access to the children.

The judge said the court had seen affidavits and reports alleging sexual abuse and cruelty of the children involving a family relative. He was told that Pol O’Murchu, the solicitor for the foster parents, would be opposed to any overnight access by the natural parents to the children.

“The question of overnight access fills me with considerable concern and those concerns would want to be allayed very powerfully in order for overnight access to be allowed,” Kelly said.

He said that, in circumstances which he found to be very strange, a District Court hearing that had lasted for 29 days had been told that the application regarding the children’s future had been withdrawn.

He said the District Court judge had not been given any opportunity to make an order regarding the welfare of the children.

Kelly said considerable work had been done by the CFA towards reunification of the family unit but the evidence he had read was truly disturbing and caused him very great concern, particularly in relation to overnight access prior to further order of the High Court.

He said if any plan was being made to grant overnight access between the children and their natural parents the court wished to be told about it first. He had no objection to day-time access in a supervised situation and appointed a guardian ad litem in the interests of the children.

Comments are closed as the case is before the courts. 

Read: Gardaí catch man who fled scene after trying to rob bank in Wexford

Read: The examinership of Dublin’s Trinity Bar & Venue is to be opposed

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.