Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Passengers at Dublin Airport Leah Farrell/RollingNews
Your Say

Poll: Should the passenger cap at Dublin Airport be increased?

DAA have applied to Fingal County Council to increase the cap.

THE TAOISEACH HAS said the passenger cap at Dublin Airport should be increased.

The cap currently sits at 32 million passengers, with airport operator DAA applying to Fingal County Council to have the cap increased to 40 million.

Speaking to media at Boston Airport yesterday, the Taoiseach added: “Not only will it improve our connectivity for business… it will also help bring airfares down”.

The issue has been growing more political after Ryanair boss, Michael O’Leary, accused Transport Minister Eamon Ryan of sending out the message that the country is “closed for business”.

Those against raising the cap have said that an additional eight million passengers will increase carbon emissions, with People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy saying that it is “not sustainable” in terms of climate targets.

Dublin Airport’s ‘carbon per passenger’ figure for December 2023 was 1kg.

So today we’re asking: Should the passenger cap at Dublin Airport be increased?


Poll Results:

Yes (7220)
No (2766)
Unsure (401)
No interest/No opinion (119)

Your Voice
Readers Comments
44
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel