Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Support us today
Not now
Dublin: 11°C Monday 8 August 2022

No, Snapchat isn't storing your photos and never did

Updates to its privacy policy and terms of service left users concerned that it was now owning photos.

Image: Edward Smith/EMPICS Entertainment

SNAPCHAT HAS REASSURED users that it’s not claiming ownership of users’ photos and videos after it updated its terms of service and privacy policy.

The company updated both late last week, but concerns over the wording used left many believing it would be handing over the rights of their photos and videos to it.

The section that caused the most concern was ‘Your Content’ which says:

Many of our services let you create, upload, post, send, receive, and store content. When you do that, you retain whatever ownership rights in that content you had to begin with.
But you grant Snapchat a worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free, sublicensable, and transferable licence to host, store, use, display, reproduce, modify, adapt, edit, publish, create derivative works from, publicly perform, broadcast, distribute, syndicate, promote, exhibit, and publicly display that content in any form and in any and all media or distribution methods (now known or later developed).

The major difference is Snapchat doesn’t own your snaps but licences them, allowing it to use submitted photos and videos for certain services like Live Stories, which are shown around the world.

We will use this licence for the limited purpose of operating, developing, providing, promoting, and improving the services; researching and developing new ones; and making content submitted through the services available to our business partners for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication outside the services. Some services offer you tools to control who can – and cannot – see your content under this licence.

Snapchat CEO Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel who co-founded Snapchat back in 2011. Source: Jae C. Hong/Press Association Images

Many took this to mean that Snapchat had ownership over users’ content and would use private snaps for broadcasting. Snapchat issued a statement saying this wasn’t the case and that ownership hadn’t changed.

“First off, we want to be crystal clear: The snaps and chats you send your friends remain as private today at they were before the update”, says the statement. “Of course, a recipient can always screenshot or save your snaps or chats. But the important point is that Snapchat is not – and never has been – stockpiling your private snaps or chats”.

While it admitted that its terms of service give it “a broad licence to use the content you create – a licence that’s common to services like ours”, it says it needs it to operate certain services.

Making a difference

A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can make sure we can keep reliable, meaningful news open to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.

Compared to the previous version, little has changed apart from the addition of an in-app purchasing section (US users can pay to replay snaps they already watched for $0.99).

There have been similar concerns over other apps like Spotify, which recently updated its privacy policy, and Instagram a few years back. Both companies had to reword their policies with clearer language after users reacted negatively to changes.

Read: Can’t seem to find that app you removed? Here’s how to uncover it again >

Read: Police force in Twitter storm after engaging in ‘rape banter’ about a football match >

About the author:

Quinton O'Reilly

Read next: