We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Yes campaigners with their posters celebrating their win in Dublin Castle in May. Leah Farrell/Rollingnews
8th Referendum

Supreme Court decides not to hear challenge to 8th referendum vote, paving way for abortion legislation

The challenge was taken by a woman who complained about irregularities in voter numbers during the vote.

THE SUPREME COURT has said it would not hear a Dublin woman’s appeal to challenge the Eighth Amendment referendum result in a ruling today.

The ruling means the abortion legislation can now be introduced in Ireland, following the passing of a referendum to repeal the amendment in May.

The challenge had been taken by Joanna Jordan, from Upper Glenageary Road in Dun Laoghaire, who complained about irregularities in voter numbers and that Health Minister Simon Harris had made “unlawful interference” in the outcome of the vote.

However, the court decided today to dismiss her appeal, saying Jordan had not met the constitutional criteria to appeal the result.

In their judgement, Chief Justice, Mr Justice Frank Clare, Mr Justice Donal O’Donnell and Mr Justice Peter Charleton said Jordan did not show grounds that raised issues of public importance or establish that an appeal was necessary in the interests of justice.

Taoiseach Leo Varadkar welcomed news of the decision, saying that the repeal of the amendment could be signed into law and ratified by President Michael D Higgins.

“That allows us now as a Government to bring forward the legislation to allow for abortion in Ireland in certain circumstances when the Dáil returns,” he said.

Commenting on the ruling, Harris said the decision meant the Government could “get on with acting on the people’s instruction” to legislate for abortion laws.

Posting on Twitter, the Health Minster added that while there was “lots of work ahead”, plans remained on track to begin passing the legislation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel