We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A meeting of members of Survivors of Symphysiotomy in Dublin yesterday. Survivors of Symphysiotomy

'Flood of cases' by symphysiotomy survivors expected in courts next year

The government’s u-turn on the lifting of the statute of limitations for one year, to facilitate legal action for the women, has been described as “appalling”.

SURVIVORS OF SYMPHYSIOTOMY are to press ahead with legal action in the courts next year as a group representing the majority of the women called a u-turn by the government on the statute of limitations “appalling” today.

In meetings in Cork and Dublin over the weekend, members of Survivors of Symphysiotomy (SOS) discussed the government’s decision to oppose its Private Members’ Bill that would see the statute lifted for one year while the women took their cases down the legal route.

Last month Health Minister tasked Judge Yvonne Murphy with finding closure for survivors of the procedure, which involved unhinging a woman’s pelvis to widen the birth canal. Murphy’s job is to assess the relative liabilities of parties involved and outline the best options for a redress scheme.

A big year

This decision has been rejected by SOS with chairperson Marie O’Connor claiming a redress scheme would not meet the needs of the women.

Speaking to, she said 2014 “is going to be a big year” as the first test cases will run in the middle of next year. The group also intends to take its case to the UN Committee on Torture next year.

She said the government’s u-turn on the statute of limitations was “appalling” but said that this would not stop survivors of the horrific operation from proceeding with their legal action.

“We want them to have unfettered access so they can take the speediest possible route,” she said, pointing out that the statute may not even be used by defendants in cases.

“There’ll be a flood of cases streaming through the courts next year,” she added.

We’ll have trial dates quite soon and we hope winning a small number of them will encourage the other side to settle – our view is that,  one way or another, there is going to be a settlement so we’re saying the government should settle now rather than later and avoid those legal fees.

The women who underwent the procedure have rejected the proposal of a redress scheme similar to that of Magdalene survivors as they feel they should be treated as victims of medical negligence and have damages awarded accordingly.

O’Connor said that, for these women, recognition of the wrongdoing is paramount.

“For many people it’s more important than compensation – truth is more important than anything else,” she said.

Related: U-turn on statute of limitations as closure sought for symphysiotomy survivors>

More: Minister does not want legal firms to benefit from symphysiotomy settlement

Their stories: Symphysiotomy survivors gather to recount stories of torture>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.