Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Support us today
Not now
Advertisement

Taylor Swift has now decided to let Apple stream her latest album

The company announced it will paying artists for customers free streaming after Swift penned an open letter earlier this week.

Image: Ian West

TAYLOR SWIFT HAS revealed that she will stream her latest album only on Apple, capping an 180-degree about-turn after she threatened a boycott.

The big loser in Swift’s reconciliation with Apple stands to be Spotify, the leader in the booming sector of streaming, which offers unlimited, on-demand music.

On Sunday Swift issued an open protest to Apple over compensation to artists on its upcoming streaming service, leading the tech giant to reverse course and step up payments.

In response, the 25-year-old singer, who had initially threatened a boycott, said today that she would stream her blockbuster album “1989″ on Apple Music.

Swift last year pulled her entire catalog from Spotify, angry at the Swedish company’s free tier supported by advertising.

The starlet streams most of her work on rival platforms such as Google Play and rap mogul Jay-Z’s Tidal, but until now “1989″ – by far the best-selling US album of the past year – was available only on physical copies or digital downloads.

Swift slams Apple Music Source: Dominic Lipinski

In another sign that Apple is investing heavily in streaming, Pharrell Williams said that his new single would be released exclusively on the service when it goes live on Tuesday.

Williams, best known for the viral hit “Happy,” released a video on social media to preview the song, entitled “Freedom.”

Making a difference

A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can make sure we can keep reliable, meaningful news open to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.

Swift insisted that she had not entered any special deal with Apple.

Swift had initially lashed out at Apple for not planning to pay royalties to artists for streams during customers’ three-month trial periods.

She said that other artists were afraid to speak out for fear of incurring the wrath of Apple, which enjoys major influence in the music world through iTunes.

A senior Apple executive within hours called Swift, who was in Amsterdam on a tour, and said the company would compensate for songs at all stages of streaming.

Read: The internet thinks that the whole Apple/Taylor Swift debacle was a publicity stunt>

About the author:

AFP

Read next:

COMMENTS (28)