We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

University of Texas women rally at the Texas Capitol protesting the signing of the US's strictest abortion law on 1 September. Alamy Stock Photo
reproductive rights

Texas doctor sued after defying state's new abortion ban

The legislation bans abortions from as early as six weeks into a pregnancy.

A CIVIL SUIT has been filed against a Texas doctor who revealed that he had performed an abortion on a woman more than six weeks pregnant in violation of the controversial new law restricting the procedure.

Alan Braid, in a column published in The Washington Post over the weekend, said he carried out an abortion on 6 September on a woman who was still in her first trimester but was “beyond the state’s new limit,” because of his “duty of care” to the patient.

The Texas Heartbeat Act bans abortion once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which usually takes place at six weeks – before many women even know they are pregnant. It makes no exceptions for rape or incest.

Braid’s case could test the constitutionality of the new law in the southern US state, which took effect on 1 September.

The first suit against Braid was filed with a district court in Texas yesterday by a self-described “disbarred and disgraced” former lawyer in the neighbouring state of Arkansas.

“I acted because I had a duty of care to this patient, as I do for all patients, and because she has a fundamental right to receive this care,” Braid, who has been practising medicine for 50 years, wrote in the Post.

“I fully understood that there could be legal consequences – but I wanted to make sure that Texas didn’t get away with its bid to prevent this blatantly unconstitutional law from being tested,” he added.

In the landmark 1973 case Roe v Wade, the US Supreme Court guaranteed the right to an abortion so long as the fetus is not viable outside the womb, which is usually not until the 22nd to 24th week of pregnancy.

But the court, which was shifted to the right with the confirmation of three conservative justices nominated by Donald Trump, refused by a 5-4 margin to block the Texas law from going into force.

The bill passed by Republican lawmakers in Texas, the country’s second-largest state, allows members of the public to sue doctors who perform abortions after six weeks or anyone who facilitates the procedure.

First civil suit

The rather eccentrically worded complaint against Braid was submitted by Oscar Stilley, who is currently serving a 15-year sentence for tax fraud under home confinement.

Abortion providers and others seeking to protect a woman’s right to an abortion generally file suit against state prosecutors who are seeking to enforce restrictive abortion laws.

But Texas managed to avoid close judicial scrutiny by the Supreme Court because of the way its law is framed, making it everyday people rather than prosecutors who initiate legal proceedings over abortions.

Braid’s admission means that if he is prosecuted he could contest the constitutionality of the Texas law and force a court to rule on whether it violates Roe v Wade.

The Justice Department has also filed suit against Texas, following through on a pledge by Democratic President Joe Biden to fight attempts by Republican-led states to restrict abortion.

And the Supreme Court announced yesterday that it would hear a challenge on 1 December to a Mississippi law that bans nearly all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy.

The court ruled on the Texas law without hearing oral arguments, and the Mississippi case will be the first abortion case argued before the court since Trump named three justices to the panel, giving conservatives a 6-3 majority.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel