Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

(File) The act banned landlords from requesting upfront rent payments from their tenants. Alamy Stock Photo
Threshold

Housing charity questions effectiveness of law brought in to prevent upfront rent requests

The charity argues that the wording of the law allows for “an illusion of choice”.

HOUSING CHARITY THRESHOLD has claimed that a law which banned up-front rent payments, is “challenging” and “opens the door for potential coercion of tenants by landlords for advance payments”.

The charity argues that the wording of the Residential Tenancies (No.2) Act, along the with the lack of available accommodation within the private market, allows for “an illusion of choice” when it comes to paying more than one month’s rent upfront.

The act, brought into effect in 2021, banned landlords from requesting upfront rent payments from their tenants. However, according to the charity, tenants can still choose to do so, if their landlord agrees.

A spokesperson for the charity said: “Given the pressures faced by tenants who have very little options of alternative accommodation in the private rental sector, allowing a tenant to pay more than one month of rent upfront may be seen as an illusion of choice.”

Although the practice is banned, the spokesperson told The Journal that Threshold is seeing “an increasing number of renters who are desperate to find a home agreeing to circumstances which infringe on their rights as tenants”.

This comes as five students in Limerick were required to pay a year’s worth of rent, a bill of over €40,000, within the first two months of their tenancy. While the law does ban upfront payments, it makes an exception for “student-specific” accommodation.

However, the landlord added a note at the bottom of the terms and conditions of the tenancy, seen by The Journal, stating: “This is not student specific accommodation as this type of lease is suitable for workers and families.”

In reply to this, the spokesperson for Threshold said that the particular arrangement was “challenging” and reminded tenants, who is asked to pay more than one month’s rent and does not wish to do so, can report the landlord to the RTB’s Investigations and Sanctions Unit.

“Tenants can report a landlord who requests an upfront payment of more than one month to the RTB’s Investigations and Sanctions Unit. This differs from taking standard dispute cases against a landlord and can be done without a tenancy being in place,” they added.

Asked about the circumstances of this case, Minister for Higher and Further Education Simon Harris said this week that the practice of asking for more than two months’ rent in advance was made illegal and encouraged landlords to “obey the laws”.

“It’s a challenging enough time to be a student, or a parent of a student, trying to find accommodation,” Harris told The Journal.

“The government has taken a number of measures to reduce the amount of money someone has to pay [...] but at least you’re not having to find a very large, up-front sum of money – and we did that intentionally,” the Minister added.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
17
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel