We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Photocall/Sasko Lazarov
going underground

'Half-baked madcap proposal' - TD criticises proposed north Dublin pipeline project

Independent Dublin TD Tommy Broughan raised his concerns in the Dáil yesterday.

CONCERNS HAVE BEEN raised about a pipeline that could be built between Dublin Port and Dublin Airport.

The proposal would see an underground pipeline passing through large areas of the city’s northside.

Objections were raised in the Dáil yesterday by Tommy Broughan, Independent TD for Dublin North-East, who has branded the project a ‘half-baked madcap proposal’.

He stated that the pipeline had not been through the appropriate level of public consultation and that oil pipelines pose an environmental threat – seeing as no Environmental Impact Study (EIS) had been carried out on them.

The pipeline is set to be approximately 16km between the two locations and would be used to move kerosene, going through residential areas including East Wall, Fairview, Marino, Clontarf, Donnycarney, Artane, Clare Hall and Burnell.


In his statement, Broughan raised concerns that there is no provisions in Irish law for minimum set-back distances from residential areas when pipelines are being laid.

The point was also made that the Dublin Port Tunnel, which was built at a cost of €800 million, already facilitates large vehicles carrying aviation fuel to move between the port and the airport.

The proposed pipeline would be built by Fingleton White & Co and the Independent Pipeline Co.

On the issue, Deputy Broughan, said:

When it was first proposed in 2001, we had no Port Tunnel. The building of such a pipeline seems totally unnecessary now and will cause great distress and potential health and safety issues for thousands of Dublin Bay North constituents.
Government response
The Department for the Environment responded to the comments by saying:
As stated by Minister of State Phelan, the proposed pipeline will be subject to the full rigors of the planning laws like all major projects, An Bord Pleanala, who are an independent body and will require an EIS.

Response from Fingleton White & Co and Independent Pipeline Co is pending at the time of publication.

Read: Ireland’s electricity is the most expensive of anywhere in Europe

Also: Clare Daly will get a plumber to increase her water pressure if the Government reduces it

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.