Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
# it's escalating
Hillary accuses Trump of "crossing the line", so Trump accuses Obama of "founding Isis"
The belligerent Republican presidential nominee shows no signs of toning down his rhetoric after a difficult week.
REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE Donald Trump has accused President Barack Obama of founding the Islamic State (IS) group.
Addressing supporters at a rally in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the real estate tycoon said the jihadist group is “honoring President Obama”.
“He is the founder of Isis,” Trump said, using a term for the IS group.
“He’s the founder of ISIS, okay?” he added.
He’s the founder! He founded ISIS.
The brash billionaire went on to criticise his Democratic rival for the White House.
“And I would say, the co-founder would be crooked Hillary Clinton,” he said.
Trump has suffered what critics insist is a long string of missteps that have marred his campaign since he officially won the nomination last month.
Earlier, Clinton sternly warned her rival about his “casual inciting” of violence, saying he “crossed the line” after he caused a firestorm by suggesting that people who support gun rights could take action to stop her from appointing US Supreme Court justices if elected president.
Forceful
It was the Democratic nominee’s most forceful denunciation after Trump caused a firestorm by suggesting to supporters in North Carolina on Tuesday that “Second Amendment people” – those who support gun rights – could take action to stop Clinton from appointing US Supreme Court justices as president.
“Yesterday we witnessed the latest in a long line of casual comments by Donald Trump that crossed the line,” Clinton told a rally in Des Moines, Iowa.
Words matter, my friends. And if you are running to be president, or you are president of the United States, words can have tremendous consequences.
Trump and his campaign had quickly sought to douse the flames, insisting the Republican flag bearer was merely urging gun rights supporters to reject her candidacy at the ballot box.
Clinton appeared to reject the Trump campaign’s defence, warning of the dangers of reckless language during a presidential race.
She slammed Trump’s “casual cruelty to a gold star family”, referring to the billionaire’s clash with the parents of a Muslim American soldier who was killed in action.
“His casual suggestion that more countries should have nuclear weapons, and now his casual inciting of violence,” she added.
Every single one of these incidents shows us that Donald Trump simply does not have the temperament to be president and commander in chief of the United States.
With Team Trump seeking to dig the candidate out of a deepening hole, former New York mayor and Trump backer Rudy Giuliani insisted the uproar was triggered by “the Clinton spin machine”.
CNN reported the Secret Service – tasked with protecting the president and presidential nominees – spoke with Trump’s campaign about his remarks.
Trump denied the report, calling it a “made up story” and accusing the cable television station of trying to boost “low ratings”.
‘Under siege’
In an unnerving example of campaign security tensions, an animal rights activist appeared to rush the stage as Clinton spoke, but was tackled and removed by security.
Another attention-seeker dominated cable news yesterday afternoon when he used suction cups to scale Manhattan’s Trump Tower, the Republican nominee’s home and campaign headquarters, before police captured him through an open window.
The 20-year-old Virginia resident and apparent Trump supporter wanted to meet the real estate tycoon, police said.
Clinton meanwhile has launched an open appeal to independents and Republicans repulsed by Trump over his string of controversial statements.
The campaign unveiled a new website, togetherforamerica.com, that lists dozens of Republicans and independents who back Clinton, including former director of national intelligence John Negroponte and former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg.
“Regardless of party, voters are increasingly concerned that Trump’s tendency to bully, demean and degrade others sends the wrong message to our children,” Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta said.
Lawmakers, former national security officials and other critics expressed concern that Trump had advocated violence, possibly in jest, against Clinton or her Supreme Court nominees.
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Trump said on Tuesday.
Although the Second Amendment people – maybe there is, I don’t know.
Trump yesterday steered clear of the controversy at a Virginia rally, although he reiterated that the Second Amendment remained “under siege”.
Trump has suffered what critics insist is a long string of missteps that have marred his campaign since he officially won the nomination last month.
He has clearly roiled the party with his unorthodox remarks, with some Republicans frustrated at his apparent inability to stay on message.
A Reuters/IPSOS poll yesterday found that 19% of Republican voters want Trump to drop out of the race, while 70% think he should stay and 10% say they don’t know.
The RealClearPolitics national poll average shows Clinton leading Trump by 48% to 40%.
Fifty prominent Republican national security experts announced in an open letter this week they would not vote for Trump, saying he “lacks the character, values and experience” to be president.
Six GOP senators and a number of House Republicans have disowned him too.
Emails, again
Meanwhile, Clinton was enduring a fresh round of criticism over her emails from her time as secretary of state, which have been a thorn in her side and hurt her trustworthiness among voters.
Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch released a batch of emails that raise questions about the State Department’s relationship with the Clinton Foundation.
The Trump campaign seized on the latest emails to blast Clinton as “corrupt” with critics saying the messages showed the foundation sought improper preferential treatment from the department.
