Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
TWITTER HAS ASKED a judge in New York to block a subpoena which would force it to hand over the data of one of its users.
Malcolm Harris was arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge last October, and prosecutors have attempted to gain access to three months worth of his tweets and data without a warrant according to Forbes. Harris had already mounted his own case against the subpoena but had failed when a judge ruled that he did not own the tweets, Twitter did.
Harris is an activist and a writer who has since deleted tweets he posted around the time of his arrest. The Washington Post reports that the Manhattan District Attorney wants to establish whether Harris knew that demonstrators had been ordered not to march over the Brooklyn Bridge.
More than 700 people were arrested after they swarmed the bridge in October 2011, blocking traffic for several hours.
Twitter has now filed a motion stating that users do own their own content and the company’s terms of service state that users “retain [their] rights to and content [they] submit, post or display on or through” Twitter. The motion also identifies that the Stored Communications Act “expressly permits users to challenge demands for their account records”.
The American Civil Liberties Union says that Twitter’s refusal to hand over Harris’ details is a “big deal”. Forbes reports that Twitter had previously informed Harris that his data had been subpoenaed, while in January 2011 the company told Wikileaks associates that their data was also being sought. Twitter was later ordered to hand over the information.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site