Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
A UK JUDGE has been removed from his post after posting inappropriate comments under an online article about a case he was involved in.
The website at the centre of the dispute KentOnline, reports that Recorder Jason Dunn-Shaw, of Maidstone Chambers in Kent, used a pseudonym to call commenters “donkeys” and “trolls”.
He accused others of being “narrow-minded and bigoted” – and also complained “lots of warty fingers at work here” in response to comments he disapproved of.
In a statement from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, a spokesperson said:
“Recorder Jason Dunn-Shaw was subject to a conduct investigation for using a pseudonym to post comments (some of which were abusive) on a newspaper website about a case in which he had been a judge and another in which he had been a barrister.
In his own name he also used publicly available social media sites to post material or not remove material which was not compatible with the dignity of judicial office or suggested a lack of impartiality on matters of public controversy.
The Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice said that his behaviour “fell below the standard expected of a judicial office holder” and removed Dunn-Shaw from judicial office.
Dunn-Shaw told the BBC he would be appealing to the Ombudsman “to complain about the procedure, which to my mind was flawed and unfair”.
Their other condemnation is of comments I made on the pages of Facebook friends which I believed to have been private.
“It seems to me unfair that the tracking of anonymous material places me where I am now,” he said.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site