We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Andy Warhol. Alamy Stock Photo

US Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol's estate in copyright dispute over image of Prince

The photo taken by Lynn Goldsmith was used as the basis for a screenprint of the musician created by the pop artist.

THE US SUPREME court has ruled in favour of a photographer who claimed the late Andy Warhol had violated her copyright on a photograph of the singer Prince.

“Lynn Goldsmith’s original works, like those of other photographers, are entitled to copyright protection, even against famous artists,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in an opinion joined by six of her colleagues.

The case involved images that Warhol created of Prince as part of a 1984 commission for Vanity Fair.

Warhol used one of Goldsmith’s photos as a starting point, a so-called artist reference, and Vanity Fair paid Goldsmith to license the photo. Warhol then created a series of images in his signature style.

Vanity Fair chose one of the images – Prince with a purple face – to run in the magazine.

The magazine ran another image from the series on its cover following Prince’s 2016 death. It was that second use that the justices dealt with in the case.

Lawyers for Warhol’s foundation had argued that the artist had transformed the photograph and there was no violation of copyright law.

But a majority of the justices said a lower court had correctly sided with Goldsmith.

Some amount of copying is acceptable under copyright law as “fair use”.

To determine whether something counts as fair use, courts look to four factors set out in the federal Copyright Act of 1976.

A lower court found that all four factors favoured Goldsmith.

Only the first factor was at issue in the Supreme Court case and Sotomayor wrote that: “The first factor favours Goldsmith.”

Press Association
Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel