Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Former US president Donald Trump. Alamy Stock Photo
6 january

US Supreme Court to rule if Trump can be prosecuted in 2020 election interference case

The court will hear arguments in late April, with a decision likely no later than the end of June.

THE US SUPREME Court has agreed to decide whether former president Donald Trump can be prosecuted on charges he interfered with the 2020 election, and set a course for a quick resolution.

The US justices’ order maintains a hold on preparations for a trial focused on Trump’s efforts to overturn his election loss.

The court will hear arguments in the case in late April, with a decision likely no later than the end of June.

The court said in an unsigned statement that it will consider “whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office”.

The Supreme Court has previously held that presidents are immune from civil liability for official acts, and Trump’s lawyers have for months argued that that protection should be extended to criminal prosecution as well.

Lower courts have so far rejected Trump’s novel claim that former presidents enjoy absolute immunity for actions that fall within their official job duties.

Earlier this month, a panel of appellate judges in Washington ruled that US District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who would preside over the election interference trial, was right to say that the case could proceed and that Trump can be prosecuted for actions undertaken while in the White House and in the run-up to 6 January 2021, when a mob of his supporters stormed the US Capitol.

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the claim that Trump was immune from criminal liability for actions he took as president was “unsupported by precedent, history or the text and structure of the Constitution.”

The case is separate from the high court’s consideration of Trump’s appeal to remain on the presidential ballot despite attempts to kick him off because of his efforts following his election loss in 2020.

During arguments on 8 February, the court seemed likely to side with Trump. A decision could come at any time.

The high court also will hear an appeal in April from one of the more than 1,200 people charged over the Capitol riot.

The case could upend a charge prosecutors have brought against more than 300 people, including Trump.

Special counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case in Washington is one of four prosecutions Trump faces as he seeks to reclaim the White House.

His trial in New York is scheduled to begin on 25 March in connection with hush money payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels.

Trump has also been indicted in Florida on federal charges that he illegally retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate, a case that was also brought by Smith and is set for trial in May.

He is also charged in state court in Georgia with scheming to subvert that state’s 2020 election. He has denied any wrongdoing.

Author
Press Association