Members of the local Syrian community rally against the United States' involvement in Syria, yesterday in Allentown, Philadelphia. Chris Post/AP/Press Association Images

US forces to 'punish' Syria, not push regime change

The ground for military intervention has been laid out by US Vice President Joe Biden.

US FORCES ARE readying to strike Syria, though the West insists its goal is not regime change but to punish President Bashar al-Assad’s government for unleashing chemical warfare on civilians.

The ground for a military intervention was laid out by US Vice President Joe Biden, who for the first time said last week’s attack, thought to have killed hundreds, could only have been perpetrated by Assad’s forces.

Also today, UN weapons inspections teams are preparing for their second visit to the site of an alleged chemical weapons attack.


But the onrushing likelihood of action within days was met with defiance in Damascus, with regime officials pledging to fight any attack with “surprise” measures, while Syrian allies Russia and Iran warned of dire consequences.

But Britain and France also moved to back the use of force in Syria, while the White House promised to provide declassified evidence this week to prove that last Wednesday’s chemical attack was the work of regime forces.

Analysts expect to see cruise missiles launched from US and allied submarines, ships and possibly planes, firing into Syria from outside its waters and airspace.

International norm

imageMembers of the local Syrian community rally against the United States’ involvement in Syria, yesterday in Allentown, Philadelphia. Pic: AP Photo/Chris Post

Biden said an “essential international norm” had been violated in Syria.

“There is no doubt who is responsible for this heinous use of chemical weapons in Syria – the Syrian regime,” Biden said.

Foreign Policy magazine reported late Tuesday that US intelligence had intercepted communications involving a Syrian defense ministry official last week in “panicked phone calls” with the leader of a chemical weapons unit.

That official was “demanding answers for a nerve agent strike that killed more than 1,000 people,” the magazine said. It added that this is the main reason the United States is certain that Syria used chemical weapons against civilians.

During a news conference earlier Tuesday, Syria’s Foreign Minister Walid Muallem said Damascus would defend itself.

We have two options: either to surrender, or to defend ourselves with the means at our disposal,” he said. “The second choice is the best. We will defend ourselves.

US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the American military was already prepared to act if President Barack Obama gave the order – though White House aides said no final decision had been taken.

French President Francois Hollande said his country was “ready to punish” those behind the chemical attacks and that he would meet the Syrian opposition’s leader tomorrow.

In London, Prime Minister David Cameron recalled parliament to discuss the crisis and slammed Syria’s use of chemical weapons as “morally indefensible.”

imagePic: AP Photo/Chris Post

The White House said that any US action would be to defend the principle that chemical weapons should not be used – and would not aim to topple Assad, despite previous calls for him to go.

“I want to make clear that the options that we are considering are not about regime change,” said Obama’s spokesman Jay Carney, noting that a declassified version of a US intelligence investigation into the attack would be released this week.

Carney refused to say whether Washington would seek a UN Security Council mandate for action, despite the likelihood of a Russian veto.

Oil price soars

A military campaign in Syria is expected to be limited in scope, likely to last only several days and to target military sites but not the chemical weapons stocks themselves, sources in Washington said.

An opposition Syrian National Coalition official said in Beirut that the group expects a Western military intervention and it has been consulted over targets, which included airports, military bases and arms depots.

“It’s a question of days and not weeks,” said Ahmad Ramadan, adding that “there have been meetings between the Coalition, the (rebel) Free Syrian Army and allied countries.”

The White House, meanwhile, said Obama had called British Premier Cameron on Tuesday to discuss the Syria crisis, their second call in as many days. The US president has also spoken to the leaders of Australia, Canada and France.

imageSyrians gather in the Marjeh square, in Damascus, Syria. Pic: AP Photo/Hassan Ammar

Cameron’s deputy Nick Clegg echoed US assurances about not seeking regime change. The Arab League meanwhile put the “entire responsibility” for the “horrible crime” in Syria on Assad’s government.

Syria’s ally Moscow maintained its stance against military action.

Iran, Syria’s main regional ally, said Western action would threaten the stability and security of the region.

But another key regional power Turkey, said the chemical attack was a “crime against humanity” that “cannot go unpunished.”

Amid fears of reprisals for any Western attack, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed a fierce retaliation if his country came under fire.

Increasing signs of impending military action hit global stock markets.

Most European equities fell sharply as investors ignored solid data from Germany and nervously eyed Syria, sending the price of safe-haven gold soaring.

Oil prices also soared, with Brent crude striking six-month highs on supply concerns.

- © AFP, 2013

Read: Round-up: What has happened in Syria today?>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.