Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Casimiro PT
Criticism

Versace, Coach and Givenchy apologise after sparking outrage over China t-shirts

Versace was criticised yesterday for a t-shirt that implied Hong Kong and Macau were independent.

LUXURY FASHION BRANDS Versace, Coach, and Givenchy have apologised for making perceived affronts to China’s national sovereignty with t-shirts listing Hong Kong and Taiwan as separate countries.

Versace was criticised yesterday for a t-shirt that implied Hong Kong and Macau – both semi-autonomous cities in China – were independent.

Hong Kong has become a particularly sensitive subject in mainland China as the Asian financial hub has been plunged into months of pro-democracy protests.

Today, images of a 2018 Coach t-shirt that said Taiwan – a self-ruled democratic island Beijing regards as its territory – and Hong Kong were not part of China again provoked anger online.

Givenchy too was outed for a similar offence: a black t-shirt that listed Taiwan and Hong Kong separately from cities in mainland China.

All three companies have tried to minimise the damage over the mistakes that cost them their high-profile Chinese brand ambassadors.

Coach said in a statement today that the clothes with the “serious inaccuracy” had been pulled, adding it was “fully aware of the severity of this error and deeply regret it”.

The brand corrected its website as well, after Chinese users shared screenshots online showing Hong Kong in a “find by country” drop-down list.

Versace has also apologised.

“We love China and resolutely respect China’s territorial national sovereignty,” the Italian brand wrote on its Twitter-like Weibo account yesterday.

The controversial t-shirts were removed from its official sales channels and “destroyed” on 24 July, the company explained.

Givenchy’s Weibo apology also reiterated its respect for China’s sovereignty, and said the brand “resolutely upholds the One China Principle”.

‘Sacred and inviolable!’

Chinese users online, however, were not mollified.

“There should be no missing part of China - Versace get out of China!” wrote one Weibo user.

Versace’s representative in China, actress Yang Mi, said she would stop collaborating with the fashion house over the t-shirt incident, saying the brand was “suspected of damaging our country’s national sovereignty”.

Similarly Coach’s ambassador, Chinese model Liu Wen, said she was terminating her work with the brand over its t-shirt blunder.

“At all times, China’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity are sacred and inviolable!” she posted on her official Weibo account.

“I love my motherland, and resolutely defend China’s national sovereignty!” she wrote.

And Jackson Yee, a hugely popular singer in boyband TFBoys, also pulled the plug on collaborating with Givenchy.

The three luxury brands are the latest examples of foreign companies that have run afoul of the many political sensitivities that go with operating in China’s gigantic market.

Chinese authorities and state media have lashed out particularly in recent weeks at firms that appear to back the Hong Kong demonstrations, with flagship airline Cathay Pacific facing demands that staff who supported the protests be prevented from working on flights passing through Chinese airspace.

In May 2018, US clothing retailer Gap apologised over a t-shirt showing a map of mainland China that omitted Taiwan, which Beijing considers a rebel province awaiting reunification.

Italy’s Dolce & Gabbana also apologised in November after its products were pulled from lucrative Chinese e-commerce platforms over an Instagram post seen in China as culturally offensive.

© AFP 2019

Your Voice
Readers Comments
17
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel