Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Bryan Keane/INPHO
go no go

Virgin Media says RTÉ and GAAGO have questions to answer over rights deal

The broadcaster said it was never approached about the possibility of airing some GAA matches alongside RTÉ.

VIRGIN MEDIA TELEVISION has criticised the partnership between RTÉ and the GAA through the GAAGO streaming platform, saying other broadcasters were not approached about the possibility of airing some GAA matches after Sky Sports’ rights to do so ended last year.

The two organisations have been the subject of backlash in recent days after several high-profile matches were only available to view on the paywalled streaming service, instead of on free-to-air television.

Speaking to The 42 on Monday, the GAA’s Director of Communications Alan Milton said that the GAA “don’t have another terrestrial partner, no-one else expressed interest, and to that end, we decided that GAAGO was the way to proceed.”

But in a statement today, Virgin Media said they were never approached by the GAA to gauge their interest, while The 42 understands that TG4 were not approached either.

Virgin Media said: “RTÉ is a 50% shareholder in GAAGO. This has never been clarified in any editorial discussion about GAAGO and the decision not to show key games on Free to Air television.

“When Sky Television decided not to renew its GAA rights, the GAA did not approach other broadcasters to ascertain whether they would be interested in broadcasting these games but arbitrarily decided to put them behind a paywall.

“The question must be asked, did RTE pay anything for these rights or did they just agree to keep them behind a paywall to drive incremental revenues for both partners in GAAGO, i.e. RTÉ and the GAA?”

The GAA was heavily criticised over the weekend after an encounter between Tipperary and Cork in the Munster senior hurling final was aired on GAAGO instead of on free-to-air television. There was also backlash last weekend when Clare’s victory over Limerick was also streamed behind a paywall.

The association and RTÉ have said it is not feasible to show all GAA matches on free-to-air TV.

Virgin Media said that RTÉ “now has more sports rights than it can show on its channels, with licence payers now being forced to further subsidise RTÉ by paying for GAA Sports content through its joint-venture with the GAA.”

It said RTÉ had been given “multi-million increases in State funding” in recent years.

Taoiseach Leo Varadkar also said today that the GAA and RTÉ had to decide which matches should be streamed and which should be free to air, but Tánaiste Micheál Martin said yesterday that he believed all matches should be free to view.

Correction about TV3

Virgin Media’s statement also sought to correct an error stated by former GAA president Liam O’Neill. Speaking last night on RTÉ One’s Upfront With Katie Hannon programme, O’Neill said: “We did it in the best interests of games because, at the time TV3 was going out, and it ultimately went out of business. We would only [have] had one station covering, we thought it was best to examine other options.”

The statement said: “Virgin Media Television wishes it to be clarified that TV3 did not go out of business.”

It said the broadcaster was purchased by Virgin Media in 2015 and subsequently rebranded, “based on its continuous success and achievements as a leading Irish broadcaster.”

Your Voice
Readers Comments
24
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel