TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Levels of activity in courts ‘overwhelming’ and ‘unsustainable’ – Chief Justice

Susan Denham said failure to address the problems posed by Ireland’s appeal court system may be “damaging to Irish society and the economy”.

Chief Justice Susan Denham.
Chief Justice Susan Denham.
Image: Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland

THE CHIEF JUSTICE Susan Denham has said that the levels of business and appeals before the courts are “overwhelming” and without reform, there will be further delays.

Denham was speaking yesterday at a seminar on the need for a Court of Appeal at the Law Society in Dublin.

She said a failure to address the problems posed by Ireland’s appeal court system may be “damaging to Irish society and the economy”.

The current situation in the Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeal is unsustainable, it is untenable, it cannot be defended – an appeal certified as ready now is in danger of not being given a date until mid 2017, effectively a four and a half year waiting time. This waiting period is increasing as a result of the necessity to give dates to an increasing number of priority appeals.

The Chief Justice added that the previous practice of listing shorter appeals on a Friday has largely had to be discontinued as a result of “the burden of the increased motion list”.

Denham said that the structure of the superior courts in Ireland was not designed to cope with “the volume and complexity of the litigation” coming before them courts daily in the 21st century.

Speedy resolution of disputes is important in a successful economy. In particular, at this time, there are many commercial cases before the courts. While there is a specialist Commercial Court in the High Court, with its own case management rules, an appeal comes to the general list in the Supreme Court unless urgency can be illustrated, in which case it goes to the priority list.

The Chief Justice said that a Court of Appeal, which all other common law countries have, needs to be established to address these delays.

Read: Supreme Court adjourns promissory note appeal as TDs seek to join case>
Read: Public to be given more info on sentencing in Irish courts>

Read next:

Comments (34 Comments)

  • The Chief Justice was addressing the issue of civil cases, not criminal cases.

    Say you take a chance, win your case in the High Court and feel that you are vindicated. The insurance company, financial institution, employer, public body against whom you have won will just lob in an appeal to the Supreme Court and that will delay the matter by another 5 years or so.

    The current system favours the large and well resourced body or institution.

    Reply
  • Take the repeat offenders out of the system.
    Three strikes and you’re out!

    Reply
    • And deny free legal aid in these cases too.

      Reply
    • The whole legal system is broken. Solicitors going to court and being granted 3-4 adjournments for the simplest of road traffic offences is a disgrace. Legal aid needs to be completely overhauled and judges still living in the distant past need to be retired immediately.

      Reply
    • I was in court before for drunk and disorderly and it was put back three times! In the end I got €100 fine but how much must that have cost the state?

      Reply
    • Little Jim, How exactly does that help with the mass of Civil cases that the Chief Justice is stating are causing the backlog?

      Reply
    • Joe you would be very surprised at the amount of court time taken up by repeat offenders.
      Normal people hardly ever wind up in court.

      Reply
    • This is a load of spin.
      To try and throw out the thousands of plenary summons cases against corrupt banks and a corrupt government.

      “Ohh no, get rid of that case against the €64 billion criminal bank bailout, we have people’s homes to repossess”
      “Justice system”?????
      More like a branch of a corrupt criminal bank!!!
      Disgusting
      Disgusting!!!!

      Reply
    • ?
      That comment makes no sense.

      Reply
    • Oh if only little Jim. Unfortunately we live in a state where having 50+ convictions is the norm for persistent offenders

      Reply
    • I’ll explain Stephen.

      As explained in the above article.
      The not fit for purpose, lame, prejudiced, Irish courts system reckon that they are “overwhelmed” by high levels of activity.

      Currently thousands of Irish people (who wish to avoid using the services of expensive, toothless, bought out solicitors and barristers)
      have taken plenary cases (where they represent themselves) against our corrupt banks and our corrupt government.
      The judges hate these plenary cases, because in these cases they are challenged by real people, using real Irish law,instead of the usual charade of expensive bought out solicitors and barristers doing back-room deals amongst themselves.
      The judges want these plenary cases thrown out of the courts fast, so that they can go back their little “legal” pantomimes with their bought out overpaid, solicitors and barrister performers.

      It is very possible that this is the reason for all this sudden “Ohh we’re overwhelmed” BS.

      I hope this explains my point Stephen.

      Reply
  • iBob101 03/03/13 #

    The courts system is unbelievably outdated and inefficient. For example, thieves are often prosecuted for multiple robberies in the same trial instead of quickly as crimes are committed. When the criminal eventually comes to court he gets concurrent sentences which means he only does time for the worst offence – all the others are effectively free. His incentive therefore is to commit as many robberies as possible and delay the trial as much as possible – with excuses or by not showing up in court. That’s the system the Minister and the judges preside over. It doesn’t work, it’s not impossible to fix, and it’s their fault for allowing it to continue. Here’s a few suggestions: (1) sentences should not be concurrent so sentences for 20 robberies at say 12 months in jail each should mean 20 years subject to parole – not 12 months subject to parole as it does at the moment and (2) previous convictions should be admitted in evidence because the fact some committed 10 previous crimes does make it less likely that he is the unfortunate victim of a miscarriage of justice.

    Reply
  • Its simple – change the system. It is currently a four term system with generous breaks lncluding supreme courts never sitting in July or August. More sittings = decrease in waiting times.
    Also dont come back with the argument that judges need this time to read up…they are paid well enough to make time for this and we all have to continously improve at work and are not given prolonged holidays to do so

    Reply
    • A four year backlog would still take another 24 years of additional opening in July and August to clear… That’s presuming new cases aren’t added to the list…
      I don’t think that’s then problem…

      Reply
  • The courts are a scam. For a divorce this is my 23rd trip to court and not all settled .

    Reply
  • “……..and that’s why we, as Judges, don’t deserve pay cuts…..” a preemptive stroke sorry strike methinks.

    Reply
  • System is wrought with Bureaucracy.
    Legal teams the size of hurling teams.
    All they are short of doing is engaging a barrister for providing full stops on a document..
    Another scam occupation like our politications.

    Reply
  • There must be more judges like disgraced Justice Perrin.

    Disgraced judge Perrin now guilty of false accounting –
    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/disgraced-judge-perrin-now-guilty-of-false-accounting-

    Heather Perrin (61) is currently serving a two-and-a-half year sentence for attempting to deceive an elderly friend out of half of his estate and to include her children as major beneficiaries while he was a client of her solicitors’ firm.

    She became the first member of the judiciary in the history of the State to be convicted of a serious crime and resigned as a judge shortly before she was sentenced.

    At Dublin Circuit Criminal Court yesterday, she pleaded guilty to falsifying an account of the estate of the late Gary Doyle with the intention of making a gain between May 2004 and February 2009.

    Perrin was brought to court from prison.
    - See more at: http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/disgraced-judge-perrin-now-guilty-of-false-accounting-29089240.html#sthash.LILJFSyI.dpuf

    Reply
  • all in favour say nay

    Reply
  • first of all all SOLICITORS are agents of the court with SC and barristers . this is a one party arrangement in a secrete society judging self and said to be independant. the troika in giving the money made it a requirment to appoint a ” LEGAL OMBUDSMAN ” but where is that body. Then we have the law society investigating it self another wrong in common law, for it states that no body or perso shall be a judge unto self in justice.I am aware of the court lists and settings,in this area the handing out to friends of jobs for the lads is in fact so wrong as to be criminal.I could go on and on telling the public of this cartel and its unbelivable cover ups AND POWER BEYOND ITS DUTY UNDER COMMON LAW AND TRUTH harryprice2@live.ie

    Reply
  • Levels of activity overwhelming and unsustainable ,are we talking about the levels of criminal activity or are we goin to keep brushing it under the carpet, Michelle how about an article on this its not as it does not exist the courts are rampant with criminal activity ,i approached Lucinda cumin on a case about corruption and she could not get away from us fast enough .

    Reply

Add New Comment