TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Catholic Cardinal in LA removed from duties over abuse shielding

Cardinal Roger Mahony has been stripped of his administrative duties and court-ordered to release thousands of pages of confidential files on sexually abusive priests.

Frank Zamora, 67, holds an old photo of his son Dominic Zamora, then 8, sitting on the lap of his abuser, priest Michael Stephen Baker.
Frank Zamora, 67, holds an old photo of his son Dominic Zamora, then 8, sitting on the lap of his abuser, priest Michael Stephen Baker.
Image: AP Photo/Damian Dovargane

RETIRED ROMAN CATHOLIC Cardinal Roger Mahony has defended his tattered legacy in a sharply worded letter to his successor, one day after Archbishop Jose Gomez stripped him of his administrative duties and bowed to a court order to release thousands of pages of confidential files on sexually abusive priests.

In a letter posted on his personal blog, Mahony challenged Gomez for publicly shaming him and said he developed policies to safeguard children after taking over in 1985, despite being unequipped to deal with the molester priests he inherited.

Mahony had apologised two weeks ago after another release of similar files showed he and other top aides worked behind the scenes to protect the church from the growing scandal, keep offending clerics out of state and prevent public disclosure of sex crimes committed by priests.

Gomez was well aware when he took over in 2011 of the steps Mahony had taken to develop better clergy sex abuse policies and never questioned his leadership until Thursday, Mahony wrote.

“Unfortunately, I cannot return now to the 1980s and reverse actions and decisions made then. But when I retired as the active archbishop, I handed over to you an archdiocese that was second to none in protecting children and youth,” Mahony wrote.

Infighting

The letter was remarkable because it revealed infighting between two highly placed church leaders when members of the Roman Catholic hierarchy rarely break ranks publicly, said the Reverand Thomas Doyle, a canon lawyer who worked for the Vatican’s Washington, DC, embassy and also has served as an expert witness for victims in clerical abuse cases.

“It is so rare because they stick together like glue,” he said. “The fact that Gomez said what he said, this had to have been cleared by the Vatican, they had to have discussed this with the Vatican. Mahony took the fall.”

Gomez declined an interview request from The Associated Press.

The exchange also indicates the stress Mahony is under following several weeks of damaging disclosures of priest personnel files that reveal he and a top aide, Thomas Curry, who is now a bishop, maneuvered to shield priests from prosecution, kept parishioners in the dark and failed to call police about sex crimes against minors.

Gomez’s public rebuke of Mahony, 76, for failing to take swift action against abusive priests adds tarnish to a career already overshadowed by the church sex abuse scandal, but it does little to change his role in the larger church.

The archbishop also accepted a resignation request from Curry, who most recently served as auxiliary bishop in charge of the archdiocese’s Santa Barbara region.

The fallout will get worse as parishioners themselves begin to read the thousands of pages of documents that are now posted on the archdiocese website.

The files were to be released as part of a record-breaking $660 million settlement with more than 500 victims of sex abuse, but lawyers for the archdiocese and individual priests waged a five-year battle to keep them sealed. On Thursday, a judge ordered them released without significant redactions after attorneys for The Associated Press and Los Angeles Times intervened.

Roger Mahony

In this Sept. 22, 2007 file photo, Cardinal Roger Mahony speaks during an annual multi-ethnic migration Mass at the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Reed Saxon)

Church leaders moved problem priests between parishes

An attorney for the media organisations contacted the archdiocese Friday with concerns that certain documents were improperly redacted.

Several of the documents in the newly released files echo recurring themes that emerged over the past decade in dioceses nationwide, where church leaders moved problem priests between parishes and didn’t call police.

Studies commissioned by the US bishops found more than 4,000 US priests have faced sexual abuse allegations since the early 1950s, in cases involving more than 10,000 children — mostly boys.

In one instance, a draft of a plan with Mahony’s name on it calls for sending a molester priest to his native Spain for a minimum of seven years, paying him $400 a month and offering health insurance. In return, the cardinal would agree to write the Vatican and ask them to cancel his excommunication, leaving the door open for him to return as a priest someday.

“I am concerned that the archdiocese may later be seen as liable — for having continued to support this man — now that we have been put on notice that one of the young adults under his influence is suicidal,” a top aide wrote in a memo about the priest to Mahony in 1995, urging him to stop paying benefits to the priest.

The cardinal added a handwritten note: “I concur — the faster, the better.”

In another case, Mahony resisted turning over a list of altar boys to police who were investigating claims against a visiting Mexican priest who was later determined to have molested 26 boys during a 10-month stint in Los Angeles. “We cannot give such a list for no cause whatsoever,” he wrote on a January 1988 memo.

While Gomez’s decision to strip Mahony of his administrative duties and reduce his public role was unprecedented in the American Roman Catholic Church, Mahony can still act as a priest, keep his rank as cardinal and remain on a critical Vatican panel that elects the next pope.

Victims were quick to point out the contrast between Mahony’s pared-down local standing and his continued position as a cardinal who travels frequently to Rome and remains in good standing there.

The decision “is little more than window dressing. Cardinal Mahony is still a very powerful prelate,” Joelle Casteix, the Western regional director of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, said at a Friday news conference outside the Los Angeles cathedral. “He’s a very powerful man in Rome and still a very powerful man in Los Angeles.”

Vatican declines to comment

The Vatican declined to comment Friday when asked if the Holy See would follow Gomez’s lead and take action against Mahony.

Tod Tamberg, the archdiocese spokesman, said he did not know if Pope Benedict XVI was aware of Gomez’s actions. Mahony was in Rome several weeks ago for meetings unrelated to Thursday’s announcement.

Mahony is a member of three Vatican departments, including the Holy See’s all-important economic affairs office, and he remains a member of the College of Cardinals. At 76, he is still eligible to vote in a conclave to elect a new pope.

The Vatican’s former sex crimes prosecutor, Bishop Charles Scicluna, has said Canon Law provides for sanctioning bishops who show “malicious or fraudulent negligence” in their work, but he acknowledged that such laws have never been applied in the case of bishops who covered up sex abuse cases.

In the past, even high-ranking members of the church hierarchy who have spoken out about how senior church officials handled clergy abuse crisis have been rebuked by the Holy See.

In 2010, for example, Viennese Cardinal Cristoph Schoenborn criticized the former Vatican No. 2, Cardinal Angelo Sodano, in an interview for his handling of a notorious sex abuse case. Schoenborn didn’t use Sodano’s name in his critique but was nonetheless forced to come to Rome to explain himself to the pope and Sodano.

The Vatican publicly rebuked Schoenborn, saying that only the pope has authority to deal with accusations against a cardinal.

The Vatican’s silence about Gomez’s actions indicates that officials there were aware of it, said Patrick Wall, a former Benedictine monk and priest and vocal church critic who consults on clergy abuse cases.

Mahony can celebrate the sacraments with no restrictions

“Gomez was as brilliant as a sniper the way he orchestrated this because he did not overstep his authority against the pope and yet at the same time it appears that some type of penalty is being imposed,” said Wall. “It’s brilliant and this has never happened in the US.”

Mahony will reduce his public appearances, including numerous guest lectures nationwide on immigration reform, Tamberg said. However, he remains a priest in good standing and will continue to live in a North Hollywood parish and can celebrate the sacraments with no restrictions, he said.

Mahony, who retired in 2011 after more than a quarter-century at the helm of the archdiocese, has publicly apologised for mistakes he made in dealing with priests who molested children.

He repeated that apology in his blog post Friday.

“I have stated time and time again that I made mistakes, especially in the mid-1980s,” he wrote. “I apologised for those mistakes, and committed myself to make certain that the Archdiocese was safe for everyone.”

Read: High Court to hear case of African man allegedly abused by Irish priest

Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • Dear Mr Kenny & Co. please take note of how the United States judicial system deals with the pedophile clergy and their co conspirators. We should take inspiration and offer them no more mercy than they afforded their victims.

    Reply
  • Wait and see the scandal that’s going to explode in South Africa ..

    Reply
    • Very true, but not just South Africa: South America, Asia and the whole of Africa. Europe and North America has just been the tip of the iceberg.

      Reply
    • Have a friend working on the ground in developed nations – his opinion of evil is that it originated in the Vatican.

      He helps people to help themselves, and then watches the church pull everything they have from them via the collection plate. The priests live like kings while the people that they claim to be “helping” go without, to be seen to be good Catholics.. Sound familiar?

      History is repeating itself on the African continent, and no doubt anywhere else these men in frocks have spread their foul hypocrisy.

      Reply
  • One has to divide the institution of the Roman Catholic Church into 4 categories.

    The first is the actual abusers and their collaborators. The second group is the authority within the RC Church which cynically and in an instinct of self preservation decided to suppress knowledge and, as the lesser of evils, decided to turn a blind eye and enable the abuse to cover. The third group is those who were indifferent and just put this down to a quirk on the part of some of the clergy and used to joke that child abuse was a perk of a vocation. The fourth category was the category of persons who knew but did not want to know. Some of these would warn young boys to stay away from certain clergy. It was a state of half knowledge or tacit knowledge.

    The institution of the Roman Catholic Church is deeply dysfunctional, malign and in humane. It continues to have a pernicious effect wherever it thrives. Because this toxic and vicious Church has been with us for so long, we have become somewhat blind to its evils. We try to excuse it, see it as redeemed by the minority of good clergy and we are taken in my it’s pious utterances.

    I am just one ordinary former member of this benighted empire of inhumanity. In 1959 at the age of 4 years, I has by left hand severely broken by a nun because I persisted in writing with my left hand. I was persistently thrashed in front of the rest of the class and at 6 years of age I was sent home from school for 2 months for calling a nun behind her back a “magpie”. I was one of the lucky ones. I saw how slow learners, those from disadvantaged backgrounds and those whose parents were not respectable we’re treated. It was because if my own treatment that I was able to recognise the vastly greater abuses perpetrated against others.

    I left the Church at a very young age and was beaten for not going to mass. I Jude the Roman Catholic Church according to its action. I see how it sought to prevent condoms being used to inhibit the spread of AIDS, I saw how pregnant girls were treated, I saw how the residential institutions worked, I saw the homophobia, I saw the denial of divorce, he infliction of multiple births on women, I saw at first hand denunciations and humiliations of the poor over Sunday dues, the massive and vicious problem of corporal punishment, the denial of the right to equality of gay people and the election of an anti semtic pope who was a member of a Nazi group.

    I expect this post to be removed as previous posts have been removed when I have revealed the truth about Pope Benedict, an evil and in humane man who ruthlessly leads an evil institution and perpetuates its pernicious influence on Irish society, including through the Iona Institute, the Life Institute, Catholic Comment and all of the other pressure groups who are agents of a vicious Church, desperate for control and self aggrandisement of its Institution.

    Please, please just think of the victims of Roman Catholicism and know that it continues to be a deeply unhealthy element in modern Irish society.

    Reply
    • tom 02/02/13 #

      Thanks for posting it gives a insight that many of us don’t have. I’m not a religious person myself and although i was brought up RC and in turn brought up my chrildren RC. I don’t trust the church and other than wedding funerals etc have backed away. I think many of my friends are in the same position and although brought up RC are no longer practicing Catholics. I’ve never had any issues or know of anyone personally and rely on others like yourself to speak out at the injustice that allows me make an informed decision and protect my chrildren. Many thanks for taking the time to write and share your experiences and views

      Reply
    • Far from being removed, this should be in comments of the week!

      Reply
    • I’m a victim from L.A.; and I’m so sorry and angry Peter about your abuse as a child. I wish you nothing but the best.

      Reply
    • I hear you, Peter. One of my aunts was also a southpaw, that is until the nuns got their hands on her. One of these holy women used to beat her with a chair leg. Eventually they tied her arm behind her back until she began learned to write with her right hand. She spoke up and at one point told her dad what was going on. He called to the school, after lying to him and sending him on his way, she was beaten savagely as an example to the others.

      Reply
    • With great respect Peter, your hatred of Catholicism is irrational and absurd . A bad nun broken your bones . She should have been reprimanded by her superiors and prosecuted for physical abuse . No doubt she wasn’t due to
      The climate in those days . But she is no more representative of the Catholic Church than jimmy Saville is if the BBC!

      Reply
    • Anthony, if that was an isolated incident then you would be right. But the bad effects of Catholicism are well known and are heavily felt so the hatred is perfectly rational.

      Reply
    • @ Anthony Hesketh, the point is that I was one of the lucky kids. A broken hand, although left maimed, was negigible and trivial compared to the real and intense cruelty to many others.

      I am interested in the fact that you did not seek to engage with the majority of my criticisms, merely sought to dismiss me as absurd and irrational. Based on that, I can safely infer that you are a staunch Roman Catholic Church.

      I am interested that you think that a delusional nun should have been. Oddly enough, I don’t think that she should have been prosecuted. I was and am a southpaw and that was a sign of sinister evil. So, the nun was merely following the received wisdom of the time.

      The great benefit of what happened to me was that I was enabled to see that there are bad things in the world, there are bad institutions, truly vulnerable and disadvantagedc people are the victims and it taught me empathy with others. It was my only bad break in life and I might have been as smug, complacent and blind as Mr. Hesketh had I not experienced that. It is by the actions of others that you truly know them. It is by its action that the Roman Catholic falls to be judged.

      A minor bad experience taught me a lot. Most of all it taught me that when someone says that something awful, truly awful and incredible happened they may be telling you the truth.

      Anthony Hesketh is indoctrinated and conditioned. He will not be persuaded and it would be a waste of time to try. He personifies that moral blindness of an institutionally evil body and in observing him, we can learn much.

      Reply
  • wish the church would just publish every file they have, worts and all and stop this slow ongoing dribble. It rocks the faith of many. Someone should twitter the pope to get his act together.

    Reply
  • So Mahony left a diocese second to none in handling child abuse. Given that statement can you square 2 facts? First the Pope says that we will do anything to assist victims of abuse. Second, the LA diocese has fault victims for 6 years trying to keep these documents from being released. Documents the victims wanted. Documents that ultimately provided them with some vindication. If this diocese is second to none, then the rest of the dioceses are hiding even more material or worse.
    On another point – am I to believe that during the last 6 years while the Church has been fighting the release of these documents, Gomez had no knowledge of what was in them. Am I to believe he woke up yesterday, looked at the released docs and said “OMG I guess I should do something about this – I had no idea.” REALLY! That’s what I’m supposed to believe? The sad fact is he has only taken this action because of the public pressure being placed on him because the public now sees these documents. Gomez needs to be relieved of his duties as well because of negligence since he took the office of bishop.

    Reply
    • Mr Lorenz. I know the history of several of the cases in L.A. including my own. From the documents released so far;
      it’s still a whitewash. The lead cases in our settlement. (The cases that would have first been tried was against Fr. Clinton Hagenbach, deceased. There were 19 cases against him and only 3 letters for 3 victims appear in his released file. Does that sound “open and transparent” to you? The file on Bishop Juan Arzube, also dead, has nothing but a history of where and when he served and I know he had 3 accusers. Arzube was my assistant pastor as a child; and he tried to date me as an adult.

      Reply
  • Instead of getting rid of the problem they moved it elsewhere. The whole thing was a huge global cover up. The Catholic Church has been tarnished forever by a few animals.

    Reply
    • @ Ted Power, sadly there were far more than a few animals. There were many animals and the rest were wilfully blind.

      Reply
    • The “few bad apples” defense,the old reliable.Well thankfully this doesn’t wash with most people anymore, especially those that understand this went right to the top of the Catholic church.So in fact Ted,it was the Catholic church who tarnished the Catholic church forever.

      Reply
  • Here is a list of 173 accused Minnesota clerics….(updated)
    http://mnsnap.wordpress.com/villainous-mn-clerics/

    Added: — Br. Stephen P. Baker (Franciscan Friar) with 1978-1981 Minnesota assignment at Parish of St. Patrick in Inver Grove Heights, MN

    Reply
  • Unbelievable…..where will it ever end?

    Reply
  • Brady did the same here but “he’s a good man”. Hypocrites!

    Reply
  • Nothing has changed with the Catholic Church and its horrific attitude towards abusers. Bloody lying hypocrites.

    Reply
  • bigmac 02/02/13 #

    The few bad apples argument is bull, in the bible jesus said “good fruit cannot come from a bad tree and bad fruit cannot come from a good tree” so by their own beliefs the whole thing is rotten to the.core

    Reply
    • But that’s daft because plainly it isn’t rotten to the core

      Reply
    • It f@#$ing is Anthony and its blind supporters like you that gives that institution the power it has today. Your a victim of that church too! And you don’t even realise it !

      Reply
    • @ Tony Hegarty, that is exactly the point. Anthony Hesketh is an unwitting victim. He is conditioned. He is a fanatic. He will remain loyal no matter how heinous and egregious the actions of the RCC.

      Reply
    • Anthony. The Catholic Church are today’s Pharisees. If Jesus were to arrive in the Vatican now he would be tossing tables and casting every one of those self serving con men out (Of course, to do that he would have to exist, but that’s a different argument).

      If you have faith then it’s time to ditch the religion and go back to god – because that stuff the church teaches has about as much to do with Christianity as Islam does.

      Reply
  • Essential watching on Roger Mahony and his bare-faced lies http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814075/?ref_=sr_2

    Reply
  • @ Anthony Hesketh, you confuse inter familial and intra familial. Apart from that, you fail to understand that both risks exist. Roman Catholicism has a very high threshold of tolerance of sexual abuse of children. It predictably points to the reality of abuse within families so as to distract from the true reality of its own evil.

    Reply
  • He is obviously a graduate of the John Kirby Friendship That Crossed A Boundary College.

    Reply
  • Shovel, bag of lime and an uninterrupted power supply might address this problem.

    Reply
  • People who believe in religion are idiots

    Reply
  • Peter what absolute nonsense you talk! You have no evidence for those outrageous comments you make about the church . That nun will really rot in hell not for breaking your bones but for creating such a bitter and twisted person. Really there is nothing I can say to answer such irrational slander. I do not and never have accepted the church uncritically . I accept that Jesus must look aghast at some of the goings on within the church . The abusive clerics, the power hungry bishops ,the indifferent and apathetic laity .i have no illusions about any institution and their failure to act in accordance with their mandate. But I do not believe the bad outweighs the good , nor do i accept that evil prevails. I try my best in life and often I fail, usually to be charitable to my opponents on there pages. But as Jesus said , we should try to take the plank out of our own eye before we criticise the splinter in other people’s eyes ! Peter , a word of advice : seek professional help

    Reply
    • @ Anthony Hesketh, ahh, the ad hominem insult that I should seek professional advice. It is not maladjusted or a sign of mental illness or trauma that I recognise that the Roman Catholic Church for which you advocate is an evil, corrupt, unChristian, inhumane and repressive institution which even in the early part of the 21 st century fails to accept the equality of women and seeks to stamp out internal debate. Roman Catholicism satisfies all of the hallmarks of fascism. Una Duce, una voce .

      Reply
    • Anthony.. Have you read your scripture? Because I had this argument with a fundie – I can’t quote the relevant scripture, but he did..

      See here’s how sick Catholicism is..
      According to your faith – only true believers go to heaven, all non believers all go to hell. This is regardless of their deeds in this life, you could end world hunger or cure cancer – but if you’re not a catholic, you still go to hell.

      Meanwhile – pedophile priests and sadistic nuns have devoted their lives to their god, through the forgiveness of confession they will be absolved of all their sins and welcomed with open arms into heaven to sit with their god. At the very worst they may spend some time in purgatory, but they will definitely go to heaven..

      Of course, neither exists, but if they did I think I would rather go to hell. I don’t wish to spend eternity surrounded by sick and depraved people who are so damn self righteous..

      Reply
    • No you are wrong . The church does not say who goes to heaven or hell. In fact an American priest was excommunicated in the 40s for teaching that only Catholics go to heaven . God only knows not the church

      Reply
    • Actually an asylum would possibly be a better place for you ! I am being facetious of course

      Reply
  • Perhaps you should read what Mahoney has written in his blog before judging him . I dont like the man but it is hard to listen to this condemnation by people in 2013 who live with different knowledge from that available in the 1980s. I was a probation officer dealing with some sex offenders in the 1980s in the UK and quite frankly no one knew what to do with them . I have seen paedophiles walk out of court with community penalties because their lawyer argued that the behaviour was an aberration caused by stress and it would never happen again ! We had no real idea of the nature of sex offending and the devious manipulative behaviour of these offenders . True the various churches and institutions managed the problem wrongly . We only have to look at the BBC to see how Jimmy Saville problem was handled : ‘turn a blind eye and keep the lid on it ‘ I am not exonerating the churches or wishing to minimise their wrongdoing but I can only say that no one , not even in criminal justice agencies ,understood the nature of these offenders . Thankfully we all now know more about the problem but even that knowledge does not fully protect vulnerable people from abuse. There is no test available to assess if someone is child abuser. The only way we would know is if the person has a conviction already or if there are clear suspicions ,

    Reply
    • I disagree. When I was a blond headed nipper skipping along the path to school in 1989 I would have mum’s words ringing in my ears. “Don’t talk to strangers” and above all “Don’t get into a stranger’s car.” She gave my sister and my other brothers they same drill every morning. People weren’t thick in 1980, 1970 or 1850. Mothers knew that certain men were a danger to children and you kept your kids away from them. The catholic church likes to pretend that it was faced with a problem they didn’t know how to respond to. They should have asked a few mothers what to do about their pervert priests. Ir how about asking Jesus? Didn’t he say in 33AD all those thousands of years ago: better a millstone tied to their necks and cast them in the sea? Seems like sound advice to me. The church however chose to lie, to obfuscate, to deceive and to demonise and terrorise those who came forward to call the church to account. No amount of re-writing history can save them now.

      Reply
    • ? Well your mother taught you badly . It’s not strangers that children need to fear admits abuse is inter familial

      Reply
    • @ Anthony Hesketh, you fail to distinguish between inter familial and intra familial abuse. Continue to defend the indefensible.

      Reply

Add New Comment