TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 3 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Dana on polls: ‘There has always been a huge margin of error with me’

Scallon insists there are a lot of people who have not yet made up their mind and says she has never let her country down in 41 years.

Dana Rosemary Scallon
Dana Rosemary Scallon
Image: Photocall Ireland

DANA ROSEMARY SCALLON has insisted she is not concerned by the latest presidential election polls which show her having just a two per cent share of the vote.

Responding to questions regarding the unlikelihood that she will be the next president, the independent candidate insisted that she has always performed better on polling day than in the opinion polls leading up to it.

She told RTÉ’s Morning Ireland: “I’ve never been anywhere but bottom of the polls in going into an election and I have always had better voting than the polls have shown. There’s a huge percentage who have not yet made up their mind. I think we’re all aware of that.”

Scallon pointed to her previous experience in running for the European Parliament in 1999 when she said there were fears she would lose her deposit when in fact she ended up being elected.

She said:

There has always been a huge margin of error with me.

Asked about her plans for the presidency if elected, Dana focused on the impact Ireland’s economic recession is having on people up and down the country and said that her presidency would focus on listening to the concerns of these people and empathising with them.

“The presidency is about bringing a sense of hope,” she said adding that the people needed to know “I will stand with them”.

The former Eurovision winner said she would hold a direct forum for people if elected and that she would also set up a youth forum where she would listen to the people and speak up for them.

Scallon added that in her 41 years as an ambassador for Ireland, she had “never let my country down.”

Gay Mitchell: ‘I haven’t been confrontational with anybody’

In full: TheJournal.ie’s Race for the Áras coverage >

Read next:

Comments (35 Comments)

  • The angry letter from Danana to her niece, (who is a victim of sexual abuse from when she was a child), just shows her other side. She tries to portray herself as a soft spoken, caring pious woman but it seems her sheep costume is slipping and starting to reveal the wolf inside.

    Reply
  • The allegations in the Independent today are really serious, alleging that she turned her back on her niece who had allegedly been sexually abused by Dana’s brother. She allegedly replied to faxes from her niece about the alleged abuse by saying not everything’s about you, you know! and you shouldn’t blame everything on your uncle, but nevermind I’ll pray for you! This is of a piece with the response of the Catholic church to child abuse allegations and has completely put me off voting for her, which I was considerin due to her opposition to devolving more power to the EU.

    Reply
    • How the hell did you even ‘consider’ voting for Danana?
      Thanks for mentioning that article in the papers today. First thing I thought when I saw it was “who writes a letter all in block capitals’? She’s an odd ball.
      “I’ve never been anywhere but bottom of the polls”. I thing I will giver her, she’s honest. But stubborn.

      Reply
  • Dana has a religious agenda and nothing else. I seriously doubt that anyone who is not a devout strict Roman catholic would even consider voting for her. Why would anyone want to return to the dark ages of the Vatican running this country? No contraception, no divorce, let women die before terminating a pregnancy, outlaw homosexuality .This women is possibly the most unfit candidate ever to apply for the job.

    Reply
    • Joe, the president has no say in forming laws, and is unable to make Ireland “return to the dark ages”. Her religious beliefs *cannot* have an effect on the job.

      People need to understand what the president is and what the president does before casting judgement.

      Still won’t be voting for her though.

      Reply
    • Connor I am aware of that, but I do not want a religious nut job representing our country. It sends out the wrong signals, attracts the wrong sort of people and does not represent modern Ireland. I am convinced that Dana or even Gay Mitchell would do more harm than good in the Park.

      Reply
    • Conor it can prevent her signing bills such as gay marriage, mandatory reporting of abuse or any abortion amendment. Your right that normal average people who happen to be Christian its not an issue what they do in their private life. Not to mention the negetive backward symbolism a president like Dana would bring.

      Reply
    • Joe, I’d agree that it could have an impact on our international appearance.

      Cyril, to the best of my knowledge, she must sign bills to pass them into law once they’re constitutional, regardless of her own opinion. Certainly, a religion-biased person might automatically refer such bills to the Supreme Court based on his/her beliefs, but hopefully that’s where we can trust the Courts.

      Reply
  • The only real error, was her entering the race!

    Reply
  • I find it impossible to believe that she is not concerned. If she is really quite that nonchalant, her blinkers are far too selective for somebody seeking the presidency.

    Reply
  • Dana a margin of error is polling at 55% and needing 70%. Having 2% in the polls and claiming margin for error is not political expediency it is the clinical signs that you need to be put on medication.

    Reply
    • Why is everyone so exercised about Dana if she has no hope of election? All she is saying is that at the time she was elected to Europe she had been at the bottom of the polls too and she ended up being elected. It isn’t fair to be so critical and nasty to someone who is prepared to put her money up and take part in elections. Of course it is much easier to sit back and criticise. I hope all the perfect wise intelligent people who have it all Sussed out will never have to listen to the claptrap that some of those running for election have had to listen to for the past couple of weeks. It seems that those who dislike people because they are Christian don’t see anything wrong in villifying them. I don’t think that attitude does anything for anyone, least of all for those doing the criticising.

      Reply
    • Sheelagh all the candidates in the running profess some degree of Christianity. Michael D maybe an Atheist in the closet but thats another argument so this idea that people who bash Dana is yet another example of religious paranoia. Its like when American conservatives cry when liberals poke fun at Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman and accuse them of being anti-women ironic considering religion has been the single biggest obstacle in the way of feminism. Liberals and everyone should mock these people because they want to impose bronze age myth instead of human rights and magic spells in the classroom instead of useful things like maths science and foreign languages.

      Reply
    • A true democracy separates church and state. Only by doing this can all beliefs be accommodated and treated with equal respect. No favoritism anymore, we have seen what happens when a Church is given “special privilege” and power in the past. Why not accept the facts and move on? Why look for excuses for the inexcusable?

      Reply
  • She hasn’t let her country down in 41 years? Every time she opens her mouth in public she lets her country down!!!

    Reply
  • I sure as hell wouldn’t like her to be speaking for my four young children!
    Speak for youth? The woman is living in the dark ages with her ‘visions’ and notions!

    Reply
    • You would probably be a great deal better off with Dana than some of the others. At least she has experience of some years in the EU and she is dead right about where we are headed with that and I would be very concerned for my children’s future in that regard if I were you.

      Reply
    • Are you serious? I want person that doesn’t even know the limits of the office she’s applying for, along with her outdatedness in ideas, backwardness in attitude to Europe and its relationship to Ireland, never mind her rotten attitude to our constitution and an unwillingness to sign anything into law that might update it – just because she herself might not like it!

      Thanks – but no thanks. My kids don’t need any of her crap! Be it outdated religious based or not!

      Reply
    • Dana is not in touch with reality and certainly with the youth of this country. What young people want to be told that they’re going to hell if the do not believe in the same fairy stories that she believes in ?

      Reply
  • Dana who ?!

    Reply
  • Dana wants to be President because she wants to be the most important person in the country.
    Nobody wants Dana to be president more than dana herself. She tried in 1997 to become President
    and she was voted down. In 2004 when Mary Robinson was goig for a second term Dana again tried to
    get nominated to run agaist her but was unsuccessful and is back again for the third time
    trying to become the Irish President.I hope Dana gets the message after this election

    Reply
  • Would it not be fair to ask all candidates who are members of churches as to whether their ultimate loyalty is towards their country or church e.g. Rome or Home?

    Reply
  • 41 years as an ambassador for Ireland? wtf? Johnny Logan might run next time round! For the love of God woman,stop now!

    Reply
  • SHEELAGH HANLY in a Dana sympathiser. Google her. Dana didnt put you up to this by any chance Sheelagh did she

    Reply
    • I don’t know Dana and actually haven’t decided who to vote for yet. I just think that it is not fair to anyone including Dana to get so personal – ok if you wish to have a different viewpoint and allow others to do likewise. Anyone would think that those critics of Dana have a monopoly on the truth.

      Reply
    • You dont know who you are voting for yet but you are trying to persuade others on here to vote Dana by your
      comments.

      Reply
    • It is not possible to have a monopoly on the truth, facts will always be facts even if you don’t like them.

      Reply
    • I will say this for you Sheelagh you dont take a fight lying down. But I think on this one you have a better chance of selling sand to a bedouin.

      Reply
    • SHEELAGH HANLEY dishonesty is not a very admirable trait in a person!!!

      You have already stated in the below comment on FACEBOOK dated August 4th that you will be voting for Dana!!!!!!! It’s there plain as day on the ALL IRELAND RALLY FOR LIFE page for all to see (and it is differently your profile, name and picture). All your comments defending her are all over the internet and very easy to find by simply googling you. Nothing wrong with standing up for what you believe but to mislead people about it is unforgivable and not very christian I must say.

      Would you vote for… | Facebook
      http://www.facebook.com/Allirelandrallyforlife/posts/198862333504395Annie Brady yes I’d vote for Dana if she runs. August 4 at 4:20pm · 1 person Loading… Sheelagh Hanly Me too. August 4 at 4:53pm

      Reply
  • There was a huge margin of error when they let her win the Eurovision in 1570 (Oops… I mean 1970).

    Reply
  • Sorry, wrong page. Above post is in relation to Dan Wheldon. If a moderator can fix this, please do. Thanks.

    Reply

Add New Comment