TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

David Norris to lodge Seanad complaint over media treatment

David Norris says he has been subjected to abusive media tactics similar to those being discussed at the UK’s Leveson Inquiry.

David Norris says he has been subjected to some of the same aggressive media tactics that are currently being discussed at the UK's Leveson Inquiry.
David Norris says he has been subjected to some of the same aggressive media tactics that are currently being discussed at the UK's Leveson Inquiry.
Image: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

DAVID NORRIS says he is to lodge a formal complaint over his treatment by some aspects of the media – saying he has been subjected to treatment similar to that discussed by high-profile figures in the UK.

Norris today said he be lodging a complaint with the Seanad’s committee on Procedures and Privileges, saying it was his “own direct personal experience” that the tactics being investigated by the UK’s Leveson inquiry had been replicated by staff working for Irish titles.

Speaking during the Seanad order of business, Norris discussed allegations brought against British media at the inquiry – which include voicemail hacking, blackmail, the “hounding of various well-known people” and the “bullying of those who seek to question those practices”.

Norris said he knew from his own experience that Irish publications were “certainly engaging in these practices, to my absolute knowledge.”

The Irish sister titles of some British newspapers, Norris alleged, continued to act in ways which were now considered unacceptable in Britain – with the Senator saying those papers “regard us as a colony” of Britain.

Norris asked the Seanad leader Maurice Cummins to arrange a debate with the communications minister Pat Rabbitte on media behaviour in Ireland.

The calls were also backed by Fianna Fáil senators Ned O’Sullivan and Labhrás Ó Murchú, independent senator Feargal Quinn and Fine Gael’s Catherine Noone.

Noone said some aspects of the media “think they are a power” and that an opportunity was needed “to ask them who they think they are”.

O’Sullivan also named one newspaper who he felt had been particularly aggressive towards a specific candidate in the days running up to the Presidential election, adding his name to calls for a debate on media practice.

Other senators condemned the recent developments regarding the defamation proceedings of Fr Kevin Reynolds, with Professor John Crown calling for statutory bodies like RTÉ not to be privy to “gagging” procedures where details of a legal settlement could not be disclosed.

Fine Gael’s Michael Mullins saying he had “reason to believe” that a second person, since deceased, had been defamed by the same episode of RTÉ’s Prime Time.

Cummins said he would seek to arrange a time where Rabbitte could attend the house to hold a debate on media activity and ownership.

Live: Celebrities give evidence at the Leveson inquiry into media ethics

Hugh Grant names new publication in phone hacking inquiry

Dowlers believed murdered daughter Milly was still alive after phone hacking

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • It doesn’t matter who you support, you can’t deny that some of the candidates got horrible unfair abuse from the media. The only ones who got away were m.d higgins and to a lesser extent, gay mitchell, although he was his own downfall. It just turned the election into reality tv and made a mockery of us. The media difinitely needs to be pulled up on this.

    Reply
    • Without Pat Kenny and The Frontline, we would have made a foolish decision.

      Pat Kenny, worth every penny after that – best live television I’ve ever seen!

      Reply
    • It’s amazing that if Kenny had read out a false tweet bout Norris he would have been forced to resign. Iv no sympathy for Norris tho. He pulled out after media intrusion. He had to know that he’d get it again when he came back in.

      Reply
    • I believe it was stated during the election that David Norris was in receipt of disability allowance! That would only be paid if someone was Ill.

      The media pushes its own agenda and and it is very obvious with some newspapers during election times.

      Reply
  • I agree with David Norris, all the presidential candidates suffered from extreme media interference & Bias. This presidential campaign was one dirty filthy rotten campaign orchestrated by the Establishment to get in who they wanted. Democracy ????

    Reply
    • The 2011 Presidential Election will certainly be remembered as the nastiest campaign ever and much of what was raised in the media had absolutely no relevance whatsoever to the Presidency. Having went after Norris in such a personal way, I think it was then ‘open season’ on many of the other candidates. Ironically its only saving grace was the outcome which I would argue the media facilitated (through the FL debate) but did not deliver. Sean Gallagher’s business practices and FF links were legitimate areas for the media to investigate but were not given the attention they deserved for much of the campaign and (as much as I hate to say it) it took an 11th hour intervention from SF and ultimately Gallagher exposing himself that had such a dramatic effect. I would like to think that MDH would have won anyway, as the gap was narrowing and he could still have taken it on transfers.

      Reply
    • The 2011 will be remembered as the dirtiest campaign only until the next presidential election, that’s the way these things are going I’m afraid. Mud slinging works and next time the bazookas will be bigger

      Reply
  • A debate on this issue is long overdue. The treatment of David Norris by large parts of the media was an extreme example of the ‘gotcha’ mentality that has been imported into this country from the likes of the UK and US, and much of the tabloid press in particular was in full character assassination mode. However the behaviour of some journalists from what would be considered more “respectable” publications was also shocking and there was a deliberate attempt to smear Norris and, I would argue, attack and undermine the entire LGBT community in the process.

    The trial by media that Norris was subjected to and the deliberate distortion of his views was extreme, but there have been other similiar examples over the years and this ‘dumbing down’ of the media and appealing to the lowest common denominator must be tackled. Otherwise, we will find ourselves in the same sorry state that much of the British press has been reduced to.

    Reply
  • I have to say that the media’s treatment of Norris and quite a few others was disgusting.

    I am glad that Higgins won, however I find it interesting that anyone who emerged as a threat to Higgins was the subject of a focused dirty tricks campaign by the media. First David Norris was targeted, then McGuinness (though it pains me to admit that) and finally Gallagher was focused on.

    I am no fan of the later 2 candidates but even I could see the agenda that the media, particularly RTE, had.

    Reply
  • Get over it.

    This coming from the guy who charged thousands to speak at after dinner events when he was on sick leave from Trinity college. #greed

    Reply
  • Anything for Media time! Idiot!

    Reply
    • I thought his problem during the election was that he couldn’t keep out of the media?

      Reply
    • I can’t read anything written by David Norris without hearing his voice in my head…
      Anyway Norris is God IMO, he took the Irish State all the way to the European court to get our archaic bigoted laws changed and he won. Anyone who can beat the Man at his own game is the bomb.

      Reply
    • Norris absolutely right to complain. His campaign was constantly harried by stories as laden with innuendo as facts. There wasn’t an aspect of the man’s life that was held up to scrutiny tipping into ridicule. Even his accents was mocked or deemed suspect. All to often the media think it is ok to give the complete name, age, address and occupation of someone only to slip in at the end, after revving up insinuations, that there is nothing it it, he is innocent, etc. That Norris is still on his feet says something about his stamina.

      Reply
  • What exactly did the media say that was untrue Mr. Norris?

    Reply
    • They accused him of being ok with pedophilia, despite the fact that he was speaking of pederasty and how he felt he would have benefited from it (the transcripts were posted here towards the campaigns end.. It was quite clear).

      Had he been a straight woman, saying that in her teens she wished she had met an older man who could have sheltered her from the world and shown her the ropes it wouldn’t have been given a second thought.. But because he was an openly gay man it was turned into something sinister.
      This followed him throughout his campaign, despite the fact that he was very clear about his feelings on pedophilia.

      He put his hands up himself and admitted the letter for Ezra Nawi was a mistake. For that I admired his ability to say “I was wrong”, we’re all so up for our politicians being held accountable, he was able to admit his failure and stand down. It was public support that got him to re-enter the race.

      The papers were forced to print a retraction about the “disability allowance” scandal, because as pointed out above it was hardly state benefits which was what it was made out and generally understood to be.

      I think you’ll find that while outright lies may not have been told, it was the words chosen, the grammar used, that constituted lies.. Pederasty and pedophilia are not the same thing. A private payment protection scheme is not “disability allowance”.

      It’s a very common form of propaganda tool to mess with the wording and grammar like that, another is to introduce fallacy or dodgy rhetoric.. Seriously, you should actually read articles.. It’s all over the place..

      Reply
  • David , take a rest, go on holiday, don,t be letting them kill you off, the franklin school of dance. does it still opperate next door to u, tapp n ballet that wouls be a good start to washing the irish shitdust of ya, xxr

    Reply
  • Walk away into the sunset there’s a good fellow , poor David his craven love of his own self is repulsive.

    Reply
    • I have to say I always find that put down quite strange.
      If you cannot feel love for yourself then you cannot feel love. There is a difference between self love and narcissism because narcissists do not truly feel emotion.

      To discourage people from self love is really a very negative thing, and saying that others are wrong for being comfortable enough in their own skin to just be themselves shows a deep envy, perhaps stemming from self loathing..

      I sincerely hope that this doesn’t apply to you and that you can love yourself :)

      Reply
  • There’s a certain type of person who seeks the adoration that a public profile can bring, but, will not accept the criticism such a profile will inevitably also bring.

    Anyone who puts themselves out there is fair game, IMO.

    Reply

Add New Comment