TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Gardaí and banks should be more transparent – Ombudsman

Emily O’Reilly said the gardaí, Nama and State-owned financial institutions should all be made subject to Freedom of Information laws.

Emily O'Reilly
Emily O'Reilly
Image: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

THE GOVERNMENT OMBUDSMAN has called for more transparency in State organisations, including the gardaí and Nama.

Emily O’Reilly said Freedom of Information laws should extend to areas which are currently beyond public scrutiny.

She suggested that State-owned financial institutions should also be brought into the legislation, which allows members of the public to request documents and records.

O’Reilly said the Government was currently “moving ahead” with legislation to extend the FOI scheme, but she was not sure how far the changes would go. She told RTÉ’s Marian Finucane Show:

For me the litmus test will be whether the gardaí will be brought in under FOI. The police have been under FOI in the UK since it came in in 2005. And also organisations that are frequently dealt with on your programme – Nama, the NTMA, the financial institutions.

She acknowledged Nama’s claims that commercial sensitivities made it difficult to release information publicly, but said: “I think we the people deserve to know what this organisation which is dealing with billions is doing.”

The Freedom of Information Act came into force in Ireland in 1998. However, it was then amended in 2003 to introduce fees for making FOI requests.

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • Sane reason she is call a woMAN! :)

    Reply
  • Certain things like previous convictions, etc maybe should be under the umbrella but you can’t let anyone have access to intelligence, incidents etc just doesnt make sense at all, how the hell would you be able to police a state where intel is accessible via foia. Not going to happen not a hope.

    Reply
    • @Alan Mooney: The Garda have never policed Ireland because of using opinions in law since 1922.

      For the most part opinions do not exist and the Garda have never figured that part out yet.

      Because opinions do not exist, nobody can keep proper records, hence the Garda do not know what to look for.

      Reply
  • not a hope in hell then the books will be exposed for the last 17 years
    and the real truth exposed Ireland banking system just went public at the expense of the public

    if the books are not destroyed yet the real question is who’s money was in ireland who really ran this country for the last 17 years

    Reply
  • Well if the English are doing it!.. She is worth every penny

    Reply
  • Sure. Let all the criminals and subversives have access to the information the Gardai have on them.

    Reply
    • And that would include the Garda teams behind the filth uncovered by the Morris Tribunal on atrocious behaviour in Donegal, Dean Lyons, Nora Wall, Ian Bailey, Frank Short and any other number of corrupt scandals that would make a shyster in Burkina Faso look very honourable. Remember Garda O’Neill who sold a passport to the gang behind the murder of Veronica Guerin. Accountability by certain Gardai – turkeys voting for Christmas. Idiots like you give some of them the neck and gall to accordingly behave. Good on you Ombudsman.

      Reply
    • And what about all the drug seizures, raids on criminal gangs, smuggling and subversive crimes that were solved or prevented by quality secure intelligence. You should learn to balance your arguments a bit more there Seamus, sure wrongs have been committed and dealt with but they were by a minority, they will not sully the excellent work achieved by the force over the decades. Perhaps the Ombudsman should discuss the implications of this with An Garda Siochana before making statements on it.

      Reply
    • What a stupid comment. Freedom of Information from the police is common in modern functioning democracies, it is limited however with safeguards where it can be withheld in the event that it is likely to prejudice a trial or cause a crime.
      There is clearly a need in Ireland for the Gardai to comrades under more scrutiny. The many cases that have come to light in recent years show that corruption within the force is far more prevalent than it should be.

      Reply
  • Why is NAMA allowed shield those 48 who transferred assets, presumably this is illegal and surely that makes them criminals. NAMA should check accounts in the maiden names of the wives, this seems to be a great hiding place for assets.

    Reply
  • Wow – a brilliant idea for a functioning democracy. More, I say.

    Reply
  • The ombudsman is right. We should have visibility about how the banks that have been nationalized are using taxpayers money.
    Anglo Irish Bank officials have consistently refused to answer questions about how much taxpayers money they have used in PR and legal actions re. Quinn and crucially how much they have recouped for the taxpayer in their strategy on Quinn. I suspect the answer is one of the biggest scandals in Irish banking history and will in time emerge in legal actions after billions of euros of taxpayers money has been unnecessarily squandered.

    See http://quinn-anglo-blogspot.com/

    Reply
    • Perhaps some of the journal contributors can answer these questions. If so, please share them with the rest of us

      Another question that will have to be answered is why the seizing and ruination of the Quinn Group was facilitated by the Irish Government PRIOR to the debts being established in a court of law. This would seem to be the most fundamental principle of law, or is it the case that Anglo think that they are above the law? Grave mistake by the Anglo gurus and by those who approved seizing as it could very well end up costing the State billions.

      Reply
  • She’s a credit to the office, and an always interesting contributor, any time I’ve heard her on air, or in writing at least.

    O’ Reilly punches far above her weight, and her input should be given weighty scrutiny, in my view.

    Reply
  • She must be the most frustrated woman in Ireland!! Can’t imagine the police copying the British police procedures. The Banks are NAMA are so close to the politicians that it makes it impossible for change to occur. Vested interests and Irish politicians determine what will or will nor change. Jesus the Healy Rea’s can hardly read never mind implement policy change.

    Reply
  • There are still plenty of ways to keep information secret in the existing institutions and yet they want to extend to laws to those who are past masters at keeping secrets, the banks. Doomed to fail.

    Two examples come to mind.

    1. A department cannot supply documents that do not exist. As far as i know the Social Welfare Appeals Office does not have terms of reference and yet its supposed some form of statutory process, which has been stealing from Social Welfare Recipients.

    2. Most old people would not be capable of enquiring about electronic documents and until a list of documents is supplied then they keep people in ignorance, which stops them from petitioning domestic or international courts.

    The current and previous ombudsman have never addressed the issues and participate in crimes against humanity and treason by keeping the most vulnerable in ignorance.

    Reply
  • Why is she called ombudsMAN??

    Reply

Add New Comment