TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Ratko Mladic shuns ‘monstrous’ charges as he appears at war crimes tribunal

The former commander of the Bosnian Serb army robustly defended his actions in the Netherlands court as he heard the indictment against him read out for the first time.

Ratko Mladic at The Hague today
Ratko Mladic at The Hague today
Image: Martin Meissner/AP/Press Association Images

THE FORMER BOSNIAN Serb military commander Ratko Mladic has appeared at the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague where he faces charges of genocide.

He was arrested last week in Serbia after 16 years on the run and accused of committing atrocities during the 1992-95 Bosnian war including the Srebrenica massacre of nearly 8,000 people in 1995.

He told the court that “I am a gravely ill man” and that he did not want “one sentence or letter” of the indictment against him read out in the court. When the charges were read out he shunned them as “obnoxious” and “monstrous”.

In between a series of adjournments the former general robustly defended his position and insisted that he defended his country and said:

I did not kill Croats as Croats.

The charges read out, as reported by Reuters, included genocide, crimes against humanity and the violations of the laws and customs of war.

He was accused of genocide and complicity in genocide for leading the Bosnian Serb forces to massacre 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 and ethnically cleanse towns and villages in Bosnia of non-Serbs throughout the war.

He was accused of persecution for the killing, torturing raping, deportation, and illegal imprisonment of Muslims and Croats.

He was accused of extermination, murder and cruel treatment for the widespread killing of non-Serbs in towns and villages targetted by Bosnian Serb forces and for the deadly campaign of sniping and shelling during the 44-month siege of Sarajevo, the Bosnian capital.

He was also accused of taking hostage United Nations military observers and peacekeepers.

The full indictment can be read here.

After the charges were read, Mladic described them as “obnoxious” and “monstrous” and said they were words he had “never heard before”, asking the court for a copy of the indictment.

He was told he would be remanded in custody to appear again before the court on 4 July when he will have to enter his plea to the charges.

After a short adjournment the court resumed and Mladic requested a private session with the judges “to say a few words about my health”. The judges agreed to this and Mladic applauded as the judge read out the details of how such private sessions are conducted.

The court then resumed to hear further comments from Mladic in which his ramblings were interrupted a number of times by the judge. Mladic stated:

I am General Mladic and the whole world knows who I am.

He said he did not fear any journalists, nations or any ethnicity and added:

I want to live to see that I am a free man.

The court was then adjourned until 4 July, giving Mladic just over 30 days to decide on his plea.

If he chooses not to recognise the court and therefore not enter a plea, a “not guilty” plea will automatically be entered by the court for him.

Watch Mladic appear at The Hague:


Poll: Now Mladic has been brought to court, should Serbia be allowed to join the European Union >

Read next:

Comments (17 Comments)

  • He is non repentant and still would do the same today !! Giving him 30 days to come up with a plea!!! He never gave any of his victims 30 seconds

    Reply
  • How is it everyone of these monster’s seems to be gravely ill when confronted? He looks perfectly well to me.

    Reply
    • And the pictures I saw definately made him look thinner and confused. The pic above is of a healthy man, not frail etc. Even if he was gravely ill, I don’t thing this should get in the way of the trial, as he did not stop to consider peoples personal circumstances before torturing, raping, deporting and killing them.

      Reply
  • He has had 20 years to think about it.

    Reply
  • There’s very few people can pull off a baseball cap with a suit. He’s not one.

    Reply
  • It is not a one sided story as is always the case
    In a small town of Glina, Krajina, more than two thousand Serbs were murdered, in a single night. That August night, 1941, most of the victims were butchered with knives — right inside their own, Christian shrine. There was so much blood flowing that it spilled over the church’s threshold out to the street. The appalling crime was done with full knowledge and approval of the Vatican. It did not matter that the victim Serbs were also Christians the same as their Croat Nazi murderers.

    Reply
    • Ok Gerald. Let’s go slaughter the English with impunity in retaliation for what they did to the Irish people so many years ago…

      Reply
    • I don’t see any connection. What is your point, exactly?

      Reply
    • Have you heard of “the ritual beheadings of Bosnian Christians, murdering them by locking them up into a Catholic Church then setting it on fire, pillaging, looting and plunder of private or public property when Bosnian Muslim forces occupied the central Bosnian villages of Brajkovici, Ovnak, Grahovcici, and Susanj in June, 1993 during intense fighting between Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat forces.”

      1993

      Reply
    • “Muslim terrorists” killed a few thousand people in New York a decade ago. Does that mean that the USA is vindicated in its murderous actions in Afghanistan and Iraq?

      Reply
  • Barry and Tom were quick off the mark to defend the muslims without having a clue of what happened or understanding what the muslims got up to. Mujahedeen troops murdered Bosnian Serb civilian Dragan Popovic in October, 1993 in the Orasac camp. Popovic was beheaded in a ritual Islamic beheading.
    The five Bosnian Muslim-run detention camps in central Bosnia were centers of excellence in the treatment of prisoners.

    My point being that there was savagery on both sides but for some reason the Islamic side seems to find favor in Ireland.Just as with the Palestinians who can do no wrong.

    Reply
    • You really live up to your name, mate.

      First off, I’m not defending the Bosnian Muslims and I do know that during the Yugoslav wars there was atrocities on ALL sides. The point I was making is that Mladic is still a mass-murderer, who regardless of what atrocities were committed on the opposing side, should still face justice. Your comments seem to portray a sympathy for him. Do you sympathise with Himmler?

      Reply
    • Tsk tsk Barry,did you read my first comment? I wrote ,and I will repeat it for the hard of hearing, It is not a one sided story as is always the case

      Reply
    • Mad Gerald read my comment again. I defended nobody – I just asked what your point was as, it was pretty incoherent. I looked up your Twitter account and I see from it that you are a serial poster of gibberish. So whatever your point is (if you even know yourself), you’re welcome to it.

      Barry, I wouldn’t waste my time arguing with this one!! ;-)

      Reply
    • The article is about Mladic. Posting information about atrocities committed by Bosnian Muslim looks like you are trying to rationalise his actions. Do you think that by posting information about an incident in 1941 then everyone is going to think “ah sure god love him, he was only after a bit of revenge. he’s not really a genocidal maniac”.

      Reply
    • Muslim atrocities in 1941 was just one example,did you read of the one I posted in 1993?
      The savagery on both sides needs to be exposed.

      Reply
    • Tom,do you actually read twitter stuff? I do admire your efforts at team-work with Barry,a most commendable effort but we must stick to the facts and not whimsy.

      Reply

Add New Comment