TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Obama administration sued by Catholic schools, dioceses

Legal action launched over new US policy mandating birth control coverage in employee health plans.

Image: AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

DOZENS OF ROMAN Catholic dioceses, schools and other institutions are suing the Obama administration over a government mandate requiring most employers to provide birth control coverage as part of their employee health plans.

The lawsuits filed in federal courts around the US today represent the largest push against the mandate since President Barack Obama announced the policy in January.

Among those suing are the University of Notre Dame, the Archdioceses of Washington, New York and Michigan, and the Catholic University of America.

“We have tried negotiation with the administration and legislation with the Congress, and we’ll keep at it, but there’s still no fix,” said New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan, president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. “Time is running out, and our valuable ministries and fundamental rights hang in the balance, so we have to resort to the courts now.”

The US Health and Human Services Department adopted the rule to improve health care for women. Last year, an advisory panel from the Institute of Medicine, which advises the federal government, recommended including birth control on the list of covered services, partly because it promotes maternal and child health by allowing women to space their pregnancies.

However, faith leaders from across religious traditions protested, saying the mandate violates religious freedom. The original rule includes a religious exemption that allows houses of worship to opt-out of the mandate, but keeps the requirement in place for religiously affiliated charities.

In response to the political furor, Obama offered to soften the rule so that insurers would pay for birth control instead of religious groups. However, the bishops and others have said that the accommodation doesn’t go far enough.

Health and Human Services spokeswoman Erin Shields said today that the department does not comment on pending litigation.

Notre Dame’s president, the Rev John Jenkins, said in a statement that the school decided to sue “after much deliberation, discussion and efforts to find a solution acceptable to the various parties.” The university argued that the mandate violates religious freedom by requiring many religiously affiliated hospitals, schools and charities to comply.

“We do not seek to impose our religious beliefs on others,” Jenkins said. “We simply ask that the government not impose its values on the university when those values conflict with our religious teachings.”

Other religious colleges and institutions have already filed federal suit over the mandate, but observers had been closely watching for Notre Dame’s next step.

The university, among the best-known Catholic schools in the country, has indicated past willingness to work with President Barack Obama, despite their differences with him on abortion and other issues. Notre Dame came under unprecedented criticism from US bishops and others in 2009 for inviting Obama, who supports abortion rights, as commencement speaker and presenting him with an honorary law degree.

Read next:

Comments (20 Comments)

  • He should TAX THEM!

    Reply
  • An obscure sect, that is all they are!

    Reply
  • It is telling that a University which has previously had such a good relationship with Obama is choosing to take this action. It is an multi-faceted case though, which doesn’t exactly have an easy answer. I hope this thread doesn’t turn into the usual anti-Catholic or anti-religion we see here so much because there is far more to it than that i.e. should an employer be forced to pay their employee’s medical expenses?

    Reply
    • As I understand it, an employer isn’t forced to pay for their employees medical insurance, but most choose to because they can get a better deal by negotiating in bulk with the insurance company on behalf of their employees. So health coverage becomes a perk they can offer to their employees that ends up costing them less than if they let their employees buy their own insurance and paid enough so the employees have the same net income.

      The problem for the churches is that Obama has mandated that contraceptives should be covered under the insurance plans. So the church would either have to live with the idea that some of the money they pay may go towards contraceptives, or else end up letting their employees buy their own coverage and have to pay more to offer their employees the same net income.

      Reply
    • Yes. They can also deduct the expensed on Form C for employee benefit contributions.

      Reply
    • @Ryan never mind religion this is a question of healthcare. It is policies like this that have the likes of Rush Limbaugh yelling slut when a woman stands up and speaks against policies that resulted in her friend having an ovary removed because her health insurance she had with the university didn’t pay for her to have the pill that would’ve prevented a cyst forming. This is a sickening policy and borne out of outdated values. Same country has people calling for funding to be cut to family planning centres because they provide contraception, yet the same centres also provide affordable breast screenings in a country where health insurance is ridiculously overpriced. When I was over there, the guy I worked for was paying for standard healthcare for himself, his wife and 2 kids and it was $1,000 a month. US seriously needs a wake up call over their values and people health shouldn’t be put at risk for the sake of not offending religious institution.

      By the way, students in universities pay for medical healthcare in their premiums which are compulsory in some American colleges. As for employees, like Seamus said its a deductible expense. If you want a tax break you have to meet certain conditions.

      Reply
    • @ John/Seamus: Thanks for that, I was certain that employers were legally bound to cover it. Is it a requirement in some States though?

      @ Abi:

      “Never mind religion this is a question of healthcare”

      That is what I meant. Too often on here, the debate on an article turns into religion bashing and this can completely miss the point (see the article on Katie Taylor from the other day as an example – more people criticising her for using the phrase “Thank God” than being proud of her!). I tried to widen the debate to ask who should pay for healthcare. There are three options I suppose: the government (i.e. taxpayers), the employer or the individual themselves.

      I’m confused though – which policy do you mean is “sickening”? Obama’s? Because this is challenging his policy.

      Reply
    • the policy wherby that university in georgias healthplan didnt cover the pill for a woman who needed it on health grounds, but the policy subsequently covered her ovary removal that she needed as a result

      Reply
    • Human rights > Religous rights.

      It’s that simple. If the colleges were arguing for their right to human sacrifices – just ‘cos it’s part of their religion – this wouldn’t even be a debate.

      Reply
  • I could say something negative about the church, and some would say, “You’re not a Catholic–you’re ignorant of the church’s teachings! Your opinion is biased!”. Then I would tell them, “I’m an ex-catholic!” and the response would be, “See–you’re the very worst kind. Nobody is more biased against Catholics than ex-Catholics!”

    So I’ll just post that instead.

    Reply
  • Sovereign immunity?

    Reply
  • How dare Obama dictate to catholic organisations as to what they can and can’t do, he’s acting like …. well …the catholic church. Bishops dont seem to like someone telling them what’s right for the public.

    Reply
  • This is a major issue over religious liberty which is fundamental guarantee of the constitution. If you don’t understand this go back and learn your constitutional history. As Harry Truman said “you can’t be a good citizen if you don’t know your history”.

    Reply
    • But people who work for organizations, such as Notre Dame college, and who are atheist, or have a different religion are suffering because the organization refuses to allow birth control coverage. They can’t claim religious freedom, but at the same time refuse to allow other people to be free from the limitations of religious belief.

      Reply
  • Supporting “freedom of religion”. Bravo!

    Reply

Add New Comment