TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Poll: How old should you be before you get a mobile phone?

A new survey has shown that over a third of kids aged 8 now owns a mobile. Parents seem happy with this, but what do you think?

Image: Kin Cheung/AP

A NEW SURVEY of Irish parents has shown that over a third of children aged 8 now owns a mobile phone – with a quarter of those children bringing their phones to school every day.

The survey, commissioned by Tesco Mobile, also showed that practically all children from the age of 14 now own phones – and while almost all young phone owners use their phones primarily for text messaging, few place much emphasis on social networking.

But while the survey found that most parents were happy to provide their children with a mobile – which allowed them to keep in contact with their child while they were away – the survey shows that more and more Irish children could be vulnerable to bullying via their mobiles.

With that in mind, today we’re asking for your thoughts on whether you think there should be a general guideline for how old or mature a child should be, before they are given a mobile that allows them to be bullied – or to themselves bully others.

Simply put, how old should a child be before they’re allowed to have a mobile?


Poll Results:








Read: One third of 8-year-olds own a mobile phone >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (45 Comments)

  • mart_n 31/08/11 #

    The kid in the picture is definitely too young to have a phone.. that’s where I stand.

    Reply
  • I think all junior schools should ban mobile phones altogether. This would take away the peer pressure in schools on the kids some what. I bought my daughter her first (basic) mobile phone when she was 10½ due to peer pressure as all of the kids in her class and the younger class had one but in reality, she only started using it when she started secondary school at age 12. In the year and half in between, she lost it around the house more often than she actually used it and the €10 credit it came with was still there when she started secondary school.

    Reply
  • The day you can pay for a phone and the bills associated with it, under your own steam is the day you should have a phone.

    Reply
    • Logical!

      Reply
    • Lots of people can’t afford a car but get one from their parents anyway. Your argument is stupid. Many kids get things payed for them by their parents. Did you only go to school when you could afford it and the associated bills? Mobile phones are a safety net for many parents.

      Reply
    • Aidan,
      Keith’s comment (not argument) was completely logical. Nobody mentioned cars which ADULTS use not children. The question was – How old should a child be before they are allowed a phone?
      Keith’s opinion is – if you can pay for one and bills then you should have a phone, I take that to mean he probably wouldn’t give a young child a mobile phone. Hope that’s correct Keith.
      Actually your argument is stupid Aidan – Giving cars to adult children is not the same as giving a mobile phone to an 8 year old. And NO child can afford to go to school… it is a parents duty to educate their children and state law. That too is not the same as deciding to give your child a phone for whatever reason – spoiling the child, safety, keeping up with the other kids – which teaches them nothing but to copy each other – are but a few reasons.
      My child did not have a phone at school or any where else. I took her to school, left her with her teacher, I took her home at 3pm. I took her to parties and collected her. She played in the garden with her friends and my friends took her to their houses for play days. She never was out of the eyesight of any adult for any reason. Why would I need to give her a phone? I’m not saying that an 8 year old couldn’t USE a phone..(.I know a 3 year old who plays nintendo games… Children are technologically smarter today, that is a fact)…but you are then asking an 8 year old to make adult decisions, when they should be playing and interacting with each other through play.

      It seems to me that SOME parents send their kids out with phones as a nanny instead of going out with them and watching over them. Cases arise when children are left on their own under the age of 12 with phones because the parent has to work. As far as I know , that’s against the law, but I could be wrong.
      This is only a discussion and people are entitled to their opinion. I like to look at lots of different sides to things.

      Reply
  • I wouldn’t have a problem with getting my daughter a phone when she starts secondary school as long as she buys her own credit from her pocket money and doesn’t use it in class. I agree with people saying it’s great to be able to contact your kids and vice versa but I don’t think a child in primary school needs a top of the line phone that has access to the Internet. You can buy phones that you programme two numbers into and they’re the only number they can call, which is more than enough for a primary school child seeing as how they see they’re friends in school anyway

    Reply
  • If they want a phone give em a phone but let em buy their own credit!

    Reply
  • Bullying happens regardless of whether children have phones or not. It’s a non-issue, as far as I’m concerned. For me, I would be most concerned with the fact that mobile phones are no longer solely being used to make calls and texts to friends and parents – but also to browse the internet. Most phones these days, even those that aren’t “smart”, have we-browsing capabilities.

    I would be very concerned with giving a child, especially one under the age of 13, unrestricted access to the internet. I would say this more than I would have, say 10 years ago. We’re living in the age of Porn 2.0, where you can stream as much explicit content as you like, from YouTube copycats.

    Children can be cruel to one another, but that’s part of growing up, and for the most part can be managed with the help of parents, teachers and councillors. But the amount of sexual, violent and downright vile content out there on the internet is a much more serious problem. I would be very concerned if a young child would see things that he or she was not fully prepared psychologically to deal with, since it is difficult to come to terms with the darker sides of human nature.

    Reply
  • I was given my first phone going into secondary school to keep in touch with the people from my primary school and to foster friendships in my new school, you don’t need one before that!

    Reply
  • The first question should be, why would they need one in the first place? They see their friends in school everyday anyway.

    Giving your child a phone for emergency reasons is a silly excuse. If you don’t know where your child is or they arent in the company of responsible adults, then the parent has a problem.

    Reply
    • Oh yea because thats how life works, your a terrible parent if you give your child a phone so you can text them when theynare away from you just to check how they are. In the words of jessie j, nobodys perfect!

      Reply
  • I think a more interesting question would be how old should you be before you own a smart-phone.

    Reply
  • There are two sides to allowing a kid have a mobile, really. I suppose depending on a number of factors such as background etc. parents have to decide what is best for the child. In my own experience, I would have said between 15 and 18, but that’s just when I take into account what is going on in the immediate surroundings. Different for everybody I reckon. Personally, I think Facebook introduces a whole lot more dangers for under-18s.

    Reply
  • Young children should always be with a contactable adult so I don’t understand the need for mobile phones.

    Reply
  • Things could have been different if Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells had mobile telephones. May they both RIP.

    Reply
  • Bullying will happen whether they have a phone or not.

    I don’t see a problem with mobile phones and children per se… I would be more worried about the radiation or whatever it is, from phones always being so close to the ear. (If they get used to holding it away from the head or have it on speaker then that would be much better).

    Getting kids phone/technology smart early is not a bad thing. Disruption to class because of them texting may be. However if a six year old could ring home because Dad crashed the car and was unconscious – what would be said of children and phones then.

    Phones are expensive and credit is an added expense. It could teach children responsibility if they had to spend pocket money on credit – assuming any child gets pocket money these days.

    Reply
    • I agree that children should know how to use the phone and in some cases this is true but a 6 year old should not have the need to own a mobile for their own use. Apart from the cost of them, I believe it is putting children at risk of being mugged because now they have something in their possession worth attacking them for. A friend of mine’s 13 year old son was beaten up at a public summer gathering for his mobile phone which has made me (and my 13 year old daughter) more aware of where we keep our phone and who is around us when we use them. Children shouldn’t have to think like this, they should not be put at risk in the first place.

      In the case of an emergency, our own phones should be set up so that our children can make an emergency call for help but there’s no need for them to have one themselves.

      Reply
    • Very logical also Audrey! I agree.

      Reply
  • Once you can use one and are taught any of the risks I don’t see the problem.I was handed a computer as soon as I proved I was capable of using one. I was 9.

    Reply
    • I think the problem isn’t computer related – it’s more to do with microwave radio signals and developing bodies.

      Reply
    • I’m pretty sure the radiation is so low it has little affect. You’re worse off being close to high voltage lines.

      Reply
    • Good point Aidan:)

      Reply
    • The question is nothing to do with radio signals and developing bodies, but it’s also nothing to do with whether a child is capable of using a phone or not (since most children can). Having a personal mobile phone opens a child up to an entirely new form of socialising, and often one that their parents and teachers have little access to/knowledge of. The main question is whether owning a mobile phone allows children to bully/be bullied more easily and is it worth the pay-off of being able to keep track of your child?

      Reply
    • the difference here is that a computer can be educational and also doesn’t cost anything on an ongoing basis. Parents are the ones that are stuck with topping up a mobile for a child, I think it is crazy to give a mobile to a small child anyway.

      Reply
  • I think that having an extra phone that can be loaned out – the way later a car is loaned out – teaching that it’s not for everyday use – might be a way. Only if the teenager is going somewhere – out of the parents control (!!) like a disco or party or on an organised trip the phone can be pre-programmed to call emergency and family/teacher numbers only.

    Reply
  • I’m always amazed at the people who only see the downside to a child having a mobile.

    They are an amazing safety device that allows you to let your child have more freedom without as much worry.

    In saying that, if you are someone who is afraid to let your child out of your sight, then a mobile is probably not for them.

    IMO, Kids need to be out in the world by themselves, otherwise they will not be independent. The world is a lot safer (stranger-danger wise) than it was when most of us were kids and I don’t know about you but I was without a contactable/responsible adult many time between the ages of 6-10.

    Reply
  • Verléin 31/08/11 #

    I am 15 and I got my first phone aged 11, but it was the most basic type, secondhand, black and white display, and only could text and call, no such thing as the internet. Right now I have the Samsung Tocco Lite, which can access the internet but I personally choose not to unless I really need to. The internet is slow, unreliable and doesn’t load well, so it’s not too much of a problem, really. But I do think giving an 11 year old a smart phone, ie, a blackberry or one of those which have direct access to facebook via a button is not a good idea. But I remember, I was one of the last to get a phone in my class, and I felt left out in a way as people could not get in contact with me as easily because I wasn’t allowed to give out my landline number.

    Reply
  • When I was at secondary school I always had a coin on me to phone. There were phone boxes everywhere and at school we could ask to use the payphone on the rare occasion. I definitly phoned home more than once in the year, after school to ask why no one had collected me, or why I was late, or where I was. These phone boxes have gone.

    Reply
  • All I can say is wait until your kid goes missing, even for 15 minutes, then all your valid reasons for them not having a phone go out the window. Don’t be so shortsighted as to think mobiles are just for talking and texting. My kids have had phones since they were 6, by my choice, not theirs. Technology and communications are a part of kids’ lives now from birth. Adults better get used to it.

    Reply
  • I didn’t have a mobile phone until I started college in mid 90s. What’s wrong with just knowing were your kid is without having to give them a phone.

    Reply
  • Quite a lot of kids have phones in Japan. They have 2 or 3 buttons for their their parents and home and not much of a display. They don’t need anything else

    Reply
  • SMcB 01/09/11 #

    In fairness, times have moved on since I was a teenager and I’m only 29! I bought my first phone when I was 18. I had no real need for one until then but I can understand why parents feel the need to equip their kids with a phone at an early age. Peace of mind is probably the real reason. That being said I wouldn’t be inclined to give a young child access to, say, a smart phone. A basic, run of the mill phone should suffice.

    Reply
  • as soon as they can talk give them a phone never too early to be safe.

    Reply
  • Who cares, its just a phone.

    Reply
  • First to vote! Scary!

    Reply

Add New Comment