TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Poll: Is online activism effective?

Do you think “clicktivism” can utilise the Internet to facilitate meaningful social or political action?

Image: FindYourSearch via Creative Commons/Flickr

ONLINE ACTIVISM HAS come under the spotlight lately following the Kony 2012 campaign – which saw almost 90 million people watch a video, Invisible Children, online.

Speaking to TheJournal.ie, Nate Prosser of Clicktivist.org said that online activism – sometimes called “clicktivism” – encourages meaningful change when used appropriately.

Supporters of clicktivism say the method utilises the Internet to facilitate social or political action by ‘spreading the word’ and creating a greater level of engagement with a cause.

However, critics say actions which require little time or involvement (for example, signing an online petition or joining a campaign group on a social networking website) are not meaningful – and, at best, ineffectual. As such, this type of behaviour has earned the derogatory nickname “slackvitism”.

More radical online activists such as Anonoymous (often referred to as “hacktivists”) can split opinion – but also engage in more niche activities than those used the general public.

We’d like to know whether you think social action online valuable to a cause, or if it discourages real and substantial action.

Do you think online activism is effective?


Poll Results:





  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (33 Comments)

  • It’s effective in raising awareness, but ultimately you need to do something in the real world too.

    Reply
    • I think most of the country is aware we’re being screwed over right now, what it’s made people really aware of how illusionary our democracy is in this country when it comes down to anything important. We have a referendum where the result appears to have been decided irrespective of how we vote. My real world activism however will be to refuse to give them a mandate to pursue their agenda.

      Reply
  • Probably wrong to phrase the question, “is it as effective?”, we need to use online activism in conjunction with offline activism. It’s another weapon in our arsenal; it does not replace the arsenal.

    Reply
    • You’re right Contact. A lot of people get their information online now using links etc from Facebook and Twitter. These are useful tools to cut the crap that fills the pages of newspapers. But people have to leave the laptop at home, get a good deal on a smartphone and hit the streets.

      Reply
  • Scarr 20/05/12 #

    I think online activism can possibly be a good foundation for starting a movement of like minded individuals or as a revenue raising vehicle for causes, but in the main, it’s a way to make people feel like they’re doing something while doing nothing.

    Reply
    • I believe you are correct , Scarr. It is a good way of becoming aware and then using it in conjunction with going out there and becoming active in the community. It is a good way of sounding out ideas or opinions …. especially if you are generally shy !

      Reply
  • Avaaz seem to be quite effective

    Reply
  • it proved ultimately effective in north africa but seems next to useless in ireland, if anything i reckon it’s more effective at preventing protests than encouraging them here, it seems that most people, including myself, prefer to rant online than get out there and try to change things

    Reply
    • Forget the online-v-offline debate, *any* form of protest against government policy is ineffective here unless there’s an election in the near future and you start getting widespread personal threats to not vote for someone. Mind you, you’d best get what you want before the election, because thirty seconds after the count is announced, the elected folk forget they ever heard of you and stop listening to the public until the next election comes round (and say what you like, Irish people have the memories of goldfish on this point).

      Reply
    • i agree, it seems like every day we are subjected to more lies and corruption from our great leaders, maybe its the unfolding pace of these events that causes people to forget the last one, that along with the cop-out ‘but who do we vote for?’ dont pick the best of a bad lot, if there are no good candidates then dont vote for any of them

      Reply
    • That’s not a real option though. If we had a ‘none of the above’ option on the ballot, it would be; but right now if you don’t vote or if you spoil your ballot, it’s just discarded and they use the other votes to elect someone. There’s no lower threshold of voter turnout either, so in theory, you could elect a taoiseach on one vote – his own – if absolutely everyone else stayed home and didn’t vote in protest.

      Reply
    • Scarr 20/05/12 #

      @peasant – unfortunately by abstaining a vote it only leaves the position open to well meaning but deluded or power hungry types. I believe you are always best to use your vote. That is why I will still vote in the next election, just not for any of the main political parties.

      Reply
    • im sorry, but if there is no one worth voting for in my constituency then it hardly matters which one gets in, so i will not help these power hungry scam artists get the high paid salary, i say this use your vote no matter what is a cop out, and maybe in theory you can get elected by a single vote but wouldnt it be a great silent protest if no one voted because all the candidates are liars? i think it would motivate a better quality of individual to run the next time

      Reply
    • It would definitely show how politicians love silent protests (because they’re so easy to ignore…)

      Reply
    • I would have to agree with @revolting peasant in one way, the volume of votes gives the politician the view, that what they are pushing has popular support, when in point of fact they got the votes because the are just slightly less crap than the others.

      Other options are needed.
      The only viable one is greater political engagement and understanding by the voters so that the gombean candidates stay away as they will be shown up to be the liars that they are.

      Absence from the voter box only gives these gombeans an easier ride. The worst of two evils.

      Political discourse and education is the only viable option.

      Reply
    • I used to have a great way of getting over that problem. Vote for a no-hoper so that the poor bastard gets his deposit back. Then Ming got elected…!

      Reply
    • I have rant here too but I also protest and annoy the politicians they have me blocked on their F.B. Pages lol lol. But they also know me to see lol

      Reply
  • 180228 20/05/12 #

    It’s definitely effective. Speaking as a member of an online-based charity organisation, not only is it effective but it can raise a lot of money for good causes. My particular charity raised $133,000 to send five cargo planes, filled with medical supplies, to Haiti after the earthquake there.

    Reply
  • The irony of this is that by clicking on the poll you are engaging in clicktivism.

    Reply
  • It might be more useful if people didn’t hide behind phoney id’s.
    it’s hard to take anyone serious that doesn’t comment under their real identity

    Reply
    • I used to agree with you, but it is not always possible . Maybe people have work committments that are contrary to their comments….it can happen, Or as has happened in some cases a person has bneen threatened, bullied or intimidated for their beliefs/comments. Or maybe they are just plain shy / private.

      Reply
  • facebook warriors ….no good

    Reply
  • Nydon 20/05/12 #

    Alternative view. Online activism is so effective that the Chinese Govt are probably considering making facebook, Twitter etc compulsory for their citizens. Availability of online steam-letting forums has become like a bee keeper’s smoke-gun for governments around the world.

    Reply
  • I think it is effective. It brings on debate amonst users and in order to debate you need to know your stuff, which involves research and fact checking. As far as joining a campaign group online being effective, If you’re interested enough to join the group it wont take too long to unjoin if you dont agree with their message via updates they post. People are now far more aware of what is going on in the world due to this form of activism.

    Reply
  • It could be effective but it seems very prone to ignorance fuelled bandwagoning.

    Reply
  • Not in Ireland I don’t think anyway. ‘Keyboard Politician’ springs to mind with this one. Particularly local or national causes, some will persistently proclaim what is right & wrong through their keyboard but will not be seen at any events for the cause etc. All seems a bit hypocritical to me.

    Reply
  • Jimmy 20/05/12 #

    It won’t make fundamental change.

    Reply

Add New Comment