Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 12 °C Thursday 24 May, 2012

Column: Ever get that feeling you’re being watched? You are – right now.

Image: Andrew Matthews/EMPICS Sport

LOOK OUT THE nearest window and see if there’s anyone watching you. I bet there isn’t.

Now look at the screen. You’re being watched right now – by this website for one. It’s got your IP address, which city you live in and how you got here. And it’s not even trying.

Yep, the online world is becoming downright creepy. For so long the reserve of the outsider opinion, the wild tangent and brilliantly weird sub-cultures, the internet is morphing into a giant megastore of sameness. It’s like going outside really.

Except that it’s not. Because when you’re outside you may be being watched, but there isn’t someone following you with a little radar that is sending ping-ping noises at you all day. When you walk into HMV you can browse around, ignore the sales person and walk out again safe in the knowledge that no one knows you considered buying a Coldplay album.

But when you click that connect button and open up Google you are really opening your curtains to a giant Peeping Tom who’s staring through the gap to see what you’re doing. You can’t bash a keyboard anywhere in the world without a little robot peering through its binoculars and taking down notes. For people in marketing, their only problem up until now was how to use this mass of information in a practical way.

That’s about to change. The old days of mass spamming has almost come to an end, with proper personalised advertising coming your way. The beginnings of this is largely been driven through social media platforms.

Even if you’re not a user of Facebook, and have only passed through it by clicking on a link one of its users posted, it has the ability to track where you go on the web afterwards. So, while you might be keeping it clean on Facebook, that more risqué video loading in your other tab is likely to go into a database that will be sold onto advertisers.

Someone, somewhere, will know that you prefer blondes over brunettes.

At present that collected information is generally going into massive databases to be categorised into broad demographical strokes. Soon however a spreadsheet just for you will start being developed. You may already have started the process yourself – the new Facebook Timeline is a fancy looking spreadsheet, but a spreadsheet nonetheless. This handy little device gives a history of your activities on Facebook over long periods of time, in what is basically an online diary of your life. Isn’t that sweet?

‘There are others who also want to see what you’re up to’

Apart from the strange conceit of letting your friends read your diary, there are others that also want to see what you’re up to and are doing it right now (and it’s not just that creepy bloke that you met in Australia one night who’s ‘liked’ every post you’ve written ever since). Facebook makes its money by selling information to advertisers and your personal information – those petty little thoughts that once disappeared into the ether – is their golden ticket.

But what matter? Being in a group of ten million people is hardly an invasion of privacy. It’s only one step further from being lumped into the masses watching Dancing on Ice and being force-fed advertisements aimed at this group. Well, it’s going to start trickling down where you’re no longer being sold something as a group of ten million, but a group of one.

If you’ve signed up for the timeline you’ve basically given an advertiser a link not only to your likes and activities but also your moods over time. It gives them access to you as an individual, and now the technology is there so they can start selling to you like one. One day you may not be able to walk down a street and see an advertisement that isn’t relevant to you.

By watching your timeline develop advertisers will learn that you drink less in January, go on holidays in June, are liable to get the flu around October, spend more on Christmas presents than the average person and go to the movies a lot during Oscar season. Once an advertiser knows this, it knows what to sell to you, when to do it and, crucially, how to sell it to you.

‘We’re the cynical generation’

That’s okay though, we can handle it. We are the cynical generation, the internet savvy group of hipsters that don’t go ‘on trend’ when we’re told to, we know what the faceless corporations are up to. We go out and protest once a year against the greedy rich and may even pitch a tent outside the Central Bank and shout ‘down with capitalism’ and refuse to drink mochaccinos from Starbucks.

WE WILL NOT BE INFLUENCED.

Except of course that we will be, and willingly so. We’ll sign up to the latest fad, we’ll ‘like’ a company so they can pat us on the head and say ‘well done’ while we drink those tasty mochaccinos.

We’ll buy stupid stuff we don’t need and instantly regret it; we’ll follow the latest fad and look back on the pictures with feigned embarrassment. In short, we’ll do exactly the same things our parents did, because all this gathering of information and advertising are just more sophisticated methods of old sales techniques.

But the digital age means we’re now moving on from these traditional methods of selling. Where once we would see an advertisement, be influenced by it, and then move on, we’re now beginning to have a conversation with those advertisements. We tell it how interested we are in it by spending longer than usual on the page, we tell it how cool we think it is by sharing it with our friends, we give it instant pleasure by clicking on it and asking it to tell us more.

When we like it, we actually click a button to tell it so.

And it’s only going to get weirder. How would you feel about personally endorsing a product? You do it already, ‘liking’ a company’s product on Facebook or following them on Twitter. Of course, you’re doing this so you can win free stuff, or supporting your friends’ business, or simply trying to associate yourself with a ‘cool’ product, but what you are really doing is putting your personal seal of approval for all your contacts to see.

‘It’ll be your friend’s face on the cereal box’

The vision in Minority Report where a persons’ face is recognised when entering a shop and a personalised message appears targeting an advertisement at them is already old hat. The future will be where you, yes you, give the message to your friends. There won’t be a celebrity or a nameless model trying to sell you the latest product; it’ll be your friends’ face on the cereal box. And because those little robots know exactly what you’re doing all the time, that girl that you cyber-stalk will be the one selling you that new brand of jeans, telling you that you’ll look great in them. Maybe they’ll add in a suggestive wink.

My bank account would be empty in a day.

And this will happen to me even though I know exactly what’s going on. I wonder what I’d be like if it began to happen the minute I was born? If a marketing executive knows that a three-year-old girl is interested in Barbie dolls than they will also know they’re most likely to become obsessed by the latest teen ‘pop sensation’ when they become a teenager. And, what’s more, through their online musings on that pop sensation’s wavy hair, that marketing executive will have their contact details to follow that child throughout their entire lives, hitting the right sweet spot at each age level. It’s efficient.

Your ‘friend suggestions’ on Facebook and Twitter will become linked to products you like rather than by whom you know. You will, in short, become friends with people because you have the same commercial interests as them, not because they make you laugh or you had a drunken fumble once. And others will sow those commercial interests in your mind from such an early age you won’t even notice it.

Sucked into a homogenous void where every action and interest is categorised into a column on a spreadsheet, you can be then kept on the right path by being selectively shown those friends that are doing the same things. Even if you’re in a minority sub-culture, you’ll feel surrounded by like-minded people and be safe in the knowledge that the product you’re buying will help you fit in even more.

You will advertise products to others.

So that giant megastore of sameness that the internet is now will change into a billion different megastores of sameness; one for each individual. The illusion of choice will in reality be a prison, keeping you trapped inside a universe you created so you won’t ever want to leave, and buy everything in the store while you’re there.

Big Brother isn’t being created so the government can watch your every move, it’s being created to sell you stuff. And it will not be formed by a shadowy cabal in a smoky room or whatever the conspiracy theorists are saying that week; it will be created in your bedroom, by you.

You’re being watched. Be careful out there.

Hugh Torpey writes at Mocking Dickens.

Read Next:

Comments (56 Comments)

  • Kristen Burns 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    That’s just ridiculous!! Why would someone just ” consider ” buying a Coldplay album? You lost definitely would buy the album!!

    Reply
  • Begrudgy 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Well if they follow me they will know i’m a cheapskate who looks for bargains. So they will probably leave me alone hopefully.

    Reply
  • Eugene Farrell 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    The ‘Majority’ Report….

    Reply
  • Eoin Melvin 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    This article is mostly bs from someone who doesn’t know their technology. Everything ‘that’s's going to happen and will rock our world’ has already been going on for years. Are you sure this isn’t meant to be dated 2006?

    Reply
  • jon_81111 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    What a cheerful outlook on Facebook . Good stuff.. Here here now someone like this comment please!!

    Reply
  • Rossa O Connor 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    People get hung up about being watched what they are at online? Would you argue that the Internet is better if everybody was completely anonymous, although you can choose to hide your ip and keep under the radar, what is the real advantage. Maybe some organizations
    are using your footprints for the wrong reasons but I would think the majority use it to improve your search accuracy and of course pushing you to what they want you to buy or see. But don’t tell me Supermarkets don’t do the same thing, when you walk in to their isles you are bombarded with signs displays etc… And they do study your shopping habits. I don’t thinks it’s as dark as its made out to be.

    Reply
    • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      How about when your credit card company takes note that you no longer shop at superquinn but at Aldi. They label you as a risk and reduce your credit limit based on your shopping habits. Think it hasn’t happened? You’d be unpleasantly surprised.

    • Begrudgy 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      You would also think shopping at aldi instead of superquinn would tell the credit card company that you are now dealing with your situation, are prepared to manage your money better and no longer wasting money on excess. Works both ways that does.

    • Patrick O'Brien 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      I’d be very surprised since Aldi don’t take credit cards.

    • Brian Daly 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      They take debit cards.

    • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      It was an example people, not the actual scenario. If you want the facts about it read the book I referenced.

    • Peter Nolan 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      You said “Think it hasn’t happened? You’d be unpleasantly surprised.” And somebody pointed out that, no, it hasn’t happened. And can’t.

      What a spoofer…

    • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Well I guess I’m proven wrong then. I guess the person you were referencing knows about every digital transaction out there and knows what every credit card company is doing. Just because you are naive doesn’t change the fact that it going on. The only spoofer going on this list is you spoofing yourself that you have a clue.

    • Peter Nolan 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      So, let’s be clear.

      You say credit card companies are keeping a watch on when their cards are used in Aldi and reducing credit limits as a result and that anyone who thinks this isn’t happening is fooling themselves.

      It’s pointed out that Aldi doesn’t actually except credit cards so credit card companies PHYSICALLY CAN’T do what you’ve claimed that they’re doing.

      Then you rollback and try and pretend it wasn’t an “actual scenario”, as if you never said that it was happening! And NOW you’re back to saying it’s “naive” to think credit card companies aren’t recording the use of their cards in Aldi (despite, mind, the fact that they physically can’t) and cutting people’s credit accordingly.

      I’ll tell you what would be naive, “Jackass Ireland”. Not following the #1 rule of the Internet: never trust unverified ‘facts’ from someone who won’t even put their real name to them. Doubly so when they’re caught out making untrue statements twice in as many posts.

    • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      You clearly have comprehension issues. Don’t blame me if you can’t read. Please wander away back into the abyss until you either read the book I referenced, or, have someone read it to you. No pictures in it though.

    • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      For those that have the ability to read:

      Http://www.creditaddict.com/archives/american-express-using-behavioural-analysis-to-reduce-limits/

      Footnote: this is just one example, this is not the complete history of the subject, for those that have comprehension issues.

    • Robert McDonnell 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      I find it pretty funny how defensive “jackass ireland” is getting just because he was proven wrong – all of a sudden everyone else is stupid, even though it was he who was wrong in the first place?

    • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Yet I’m the only one posting who’s provided 2 references. You clearly have the same reading issues as the others.

    • Robert McDonnell 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Jackass, just because I have absolutely no volition whatsoever to examine the ‘references’ that you have provided is in no way to suggest that I have comprehension issues.

      Your comment in response to mine above, however, merely serves to illustrate my original point: that you are indeed bitter at being found out to have provided an inaccurate anecdote.

      Personally, I don’t feel that any of the contributors to this thread were all that concerned with your original ill-informed comment; your stubborn, childish, insulting posts thereafter we’re what provoked people.

    • William Lankstead 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      A particular word springs to mind here…….paranoia!?

    • Robert McDonnell 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Do elaborate?

      And please excuse the incorrect apostrophe in my final sentence above, I have autocorrect to thank for that.

  • daveâ„¢ 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    hey how come theres no mention of our beloved government who want to/are keeping a record of all the email address youve been emailing or received mail from since around this time last year. id be far more worried about that than someone knowing whether i like blondes or brunettes considering some guards have already been caught rooting through the records for their own personal use already. i read on digitalrights.ie that they arent even being charged for it. shocking stuff

    Reply
  • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    This article is nothing more than a sad regurgitation of the book by Martin Lindstrom, “Brandwashed”. Nothing new being revealed in this article at all, although most Internet users have no idea what’s going on behind the scenes. It is unfortunate for our children that their entire life will be profiled from birth and the data that will be collected about them will enable marketers to know our own children better than we do. They will be pitched to, cajoled, and pushed marketing for the whole of their lives, not with just random ads, but for products that companies have verified that they know they want. The only way to beat it, is to teach kids that you actually can have enough “stuff” in life, otherwise you end up in a ridiculous economic depression spawned by personal greed.

    Reply
  • David Batt 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    There was an article in the FT yesterday saying that Facebook are going to sell data from the new Timeline to advertisers. Not happy about that at all…

    Reply
  • Wujashtop 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    I like buying things… what a strangely paranoid article. Big deal if someone wants to try and sell me something.

    Reply
    • Pani 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      I buy things online as well. If there’s a million ads out there I’d like to only see the ones relevant to me. On the other side If I’m advertising I’d rather a closely fit demographic. I don’t see the problem here.

    • Mx 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Would you not like to discover new things yourself or been told what you should and should not like? While advertising companies make a few quid of you and multiply that by a couple of million others similar to you, you’ll become a drone to marketing

    • William Lankstead 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Hey, well said Boris!

  • Colm Flaherty 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    In other words: *puts sheet over head* “BOO!” “OOOOH THEY’RE OUT TO GETTTT YOUUUU!!!!! WOOOOOOO!!!!!

    Reply
  • Robert McDonnell 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    This article is more or less scaremongering. Yes, data is collected, but the portrayal here is of an individual playing the stalker.

    This is just not the case; if nothing else it would be a logistic impossibility, considering the volume of people frequenting sites like Facebook on a daily basis.

    Nobody is interested in what ‘you’re’ doing/interested in – frankly, dealing with that sale of data would be far too expensive for the most part. What is of interest is similar information on a grander scale: where is popular to eat for 18-24′s in Dublin 4 for example? Advertising is then targeted accordingly.

    Fields full of servers store geographical information and use it as a tool to direct marketing strategies. ‘That creepy guy from Australia’, however, isn’t personally watching what toilet roll you use. Neither is anybody else.

    Reply
  • Will O'Connell 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Very good article, well written. Don’t quite understand all the negative comments but I guess their posters will start clicking my thumbs-down button now. G’wan so. (It’s useful information to know who not to bother following)

    Reply
    • Rossa O Connor 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      You’ve missed the point, it’s not about you following anybody, it’s about an article trying to portray that when you use a website and they gather some information about you and your shopping/ browsing habits that it’s going to be used to stalk you in some way, and that big brother actually gives a shit what you as an individual do, I doubt it. It’s simply not the case. It’s mass marketing and its been done for years, this is just a different approach possibly a more accurate approach, for marketing.

    • jackass ireland 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Apparently you missed the article last week about the two kids that got apprehended and sent home upon arrival in the US because of something they tweeted. Don’t think that people aren’t paying attention. At the same time, don’t draw attention to yourself and no one will care.

  • Rossa Graham 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    And every time you masturbate god sees and kills a puppy. they Will bombard you with adverts for products you all ready buy… Big deal. Oh and we always have that little free ad on called adblock

    Reply
  • Will O'Connell 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    @Rossa who’s missed the point? Me? If so, no, I got that point and I mostly agree with it, however, I’m not so sure it’s as harmless as some suggest (no more than as sinister as others suggest). I do believe though that some aspects of marketing and its connection to the pursuit of money as an end to be a branch of the devil’s work.

    Reply
    • Rossa Graham 09/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Again with the adblock. I’m not all that computer savvy but in saying that I enjoy for the most part ad free internet and my spam box takes care of the junk email. Big Brother can watch all he wants, we can’t really stop him but I can block his spam before it reaches my screen.

  • Donal McCarthy 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Yawn. So it means I will see ads for stuff I might buy instead of ads for tampons and Coldplay albums?

    OHNOES.

    Reply
  • Will Hourihan 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    The article is incorrect in a lot of its points. For instance it says ‘You’re being watched right now – by this website for one. It’s got your IP address, which city you live in and how you got here’ . It can only tell what ‘city’ you are from if you get to this site via a particular path. For instance any websites I visit will show my location either Limerick or Dublin and I don’t live in either, approx an hour and a half away from both!! I hope the Journal.ie doesnt depend on Google analytics to show what parts of the country people are visiting from because it is extremely unreliable. It’s not Googles fault, it’s just the way Eircom have the infrastructure organised.

    Reply
  • Cpm 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Yay for scaremongering! Next week, COOKIES!

    Reply
  • Peter Nolan 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Articles like this seem to treat users like they’re thick. Yes, thanks, we know a website can see the IP address of the computer connecting to it, we just don’t agree it’s “Big Brother” in action.

    Plus, there’s a lot of alarmist and inaccurate stuff in there. “Even if you’re not a user of Facebook, and have only passed through it by clicking on a link one of its users posted, it has the ability to track where you go on the web afterwards” for instance, makes it sound like Facebook sits on your drive like malware tracking your movements from that point on. Not so. The next time you close a window, and open another any connection there might have been is broken.

    By the way, should we take anything from the fact that this is on the Journal imprint, and not the Daily Edge imprint? Perhaps the more media and technology savvy team there didn’t want to associate with it?

    Reply
  • Alvean Jones 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    That’s why I tell Facebook I live in Jamaica and was born in 1910. They can get what you give them.

    Reply
  • Anthony O'Brien 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Well I don’t know. I like brunettes but I keep getting emails from blondes.

    Reply
  • Val Kearney 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Except you are being watched wherever you go. Surely if you know all that is included in this article, you know that when people sign the t&c’s for their iPhone, they give the good people at Apple or the mobile network the permission to track your movements to find out where you’re going, so they can map most popular places/collect “market research” data on you.

    Neither does it take into account that intelligence agencies, by tracking specific words, can be drawn to your comments, posts, links, emails etc. Chances are they know from people posts likely political affiliations, how we view the world around us and all that other good stuff. On top of that, there is a fairly good chance you are being watched, maybe not in Ireland as much, but take England for example. Its practically impossible to walk down a street somewhere over there and not be on CCTV. Decent article, but it focuses on something that at the end of the day is a choice. There are ways the internet, mobile phones and the simple act of walking down the street, are being used that are far more sinister than a concept some chap on Madison Avenue has come up with.

    Reply
  • Kevin Power 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Only to a public IP address though which will only give a general idea of where you are. Not the actual physical address of your house.

    Reply
  • Kenny Doyle 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    I’m carrying out some sociological research on this very topic at the moment, if anyone would like to take part please visit my facebook page entitled Surveillance Security and Democracy

    Reply
  • Harry Gibbs 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Really uneducated rant about something this journ knows nothing about! I’m shocked it was published at all!! Worse report I’ve read here!!!!

    makes crosbies rant about old and new media some bit creditable :-(

    Reply
  • William Lankstead 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    How many fingers am I holding up? Three? Four? Five? Sometimes it’s all of them…..sometimes it’s none.
    We are all just molecules inside the party. You are nothing. You do not exist……..George Orwell.

    Reply
  • Dominic McCoy 09/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    “By watching your timeline develop advertisers will learn that you drink less in January, go on holidays in June, are liable to get the flu around October, spend more on Christmas presents than the average person and go to the movies a lot during Oscar season. Once an advertiser knows this, it knows what to sell to you, when to do it and, crucially, how to sell it to you.”
    You could have sold theses gems to companies yourself and made millions……I’m mean once companies develop the technologies to use Facebook to find out stuff that obvious we’re all in trouble.

    Reply
  • Gary Clowry 10/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    I like being watched :)

    Reply

Add New Comment