TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Column: Infertility is not a choice – but treatment for it should be

Ireland’s public health system offers no treatment for infertility – so if you haven’t got money you can forget it, writes Fiona McPhillips.

Fiona McPhillips

INFERTILITY IS A medical condition. If you have not conceived after 12 months of trying, you can go to your GP, get a referral to a specialist, have some tests done and get a diagnosis such as low sperm count, blocked tubes or polycystic ovaries. At this stage, your specialist can recommend fertility treatment for your medical condition but only if you stump up your own cold, hard-earned cash. Our public health service can bring you as far as a diagnosis of infertility but it will not treat it. If you don’t have the money, your diagnosis is simply the end of the line.

Many are surprised to hear that there is no fertility treatment available on the public health system and none of it is covered by private health insurers either. Ireland, along with Russia, offers the worst access to fertility treatment in Europe.

If that wasn’t bad enough, there is no regulation in Ireland for the provision of assisted reproductive services. The Irish Medical Council has issued guidelines but there is no legal framework within which fertility clinics can operate. A Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction produced a report in 2005, which made 40 recommendations but successive governments have preferred to ignore the situation than legislate for it.

IVF treatment

It’s not that officials think that providing access to treatment is a bad idea. A spokesperson at the Department of Health and Children told me in 2008 that they were planning on making one cycle of IVF available to medical card holders and that this would be implemented in due course along with the recommendations of the Commission. In 2010, Mary Harney, the then Minister for Health, said that she was “considering policy options in this regard”.

As fertility treatment can be claimed as a medical expense for tax purposes and, as fertility drugs are available on the GMS and DPS schemes, the State clearly views infertility as a medical condition. However, when it comes to providing treatment on the HSE, patients are a soft target because infertility is often a private matter and it has had a long history of shame and stigma in this country. You won’t see tens of thousands of people marching in the street against this but, with more than one in six couples experiencing infertility, there are tens of thousands of people being discriminated against.

There are those who oppose public funding of fertility treatment on the grounds that they would rather their tax money be spent elsewhere. Well, putting aside the argument that infertility patients are taxpayers too, health services don’t work like that. You don’t get to vote on whether Mary down the road gets her ingrown toenail fixed or Uncle Brian gets his vasectomy. A health service in a civilised society provides medical treatment to those that need it, regardless of political popularity. And anyway, a Dutch study has found that, when the State pays the cost of IVF and only allows a single embryo to be transferred each time (thus ruling out the risk and cost to the State of a multiple pregnancy), there is a huge net saving to taxpayers. Pregnancy rates are higher when two embryos are transferred so it is understandable that private patients will take the chance of twins if it is their only shot at pregnancy.

Painful struggle

Infertility is a very difficult and painful struggle. A 2004 study found that 40 per cent of infertile women suffered from depression, while 87 per cent had anxiety. Luckily, the HSE will pick up the tab for these side-effects of infertility but this doesn’t make the problem go away.

In the three years it took to have my daughter, I endured two cycles of IVF, three IUIs (intrauterine inseminations), several rounds of fertility drugs and six miscarriages. That was the easy part – the treatments gave me the luxury of hope and I knew that I would carry on until I was successful. But what if I hadn’t even been allowed to try? How could I have begun to deal with the pain, the grief, the loneliness of infertility?

That’s why I set up the infertility charity, Pomegranate, with my friend, Joanna Donnelly. We had both been through infertility, had come out the other side and wanted to give something back to those who might never even have the chance to try for a baby. Pomegranate raises money to pay for IVF for those who could not otherwise afford it. Our selection policy is simple  - any couple who approaches us, has two medical cards and has been recommended for IVF but has not tried it is put forward for a lottery, and whenever we raise enough money for an IVF cycle, we have a lottery.

But the fact remains that Pomegranate shouldn’t have to exist. Infertility is not a choice but treatment should be.

Fiona McPhillips gave birth to her son in 2003, but she then faced three rounds of Clomid, three IUIs, two IVFs and suffered six miscarriages before giving birth to her daughter in 2008. She went on to have another son in 2009. She writes a blog called makingbabies.ie. She also runs the infertility charity Pomegranate. She has also written a book, Trying To Conceive: The Irish Couple’s Guide, which is published by Liberties Press.

Read: Frozen – over fresh – embryos may improve IVF success>

Read: Demand for public IVF treatment doubled in recession>

Read next:

Comments (39 Comments)

  • Fiona,good article which addresses a long ignored issue which affects thousands in Ireland. My wife and I aren’t medical card holders and had dealt with being unable to afford ivf treatment more than once when we found out that we were expecting a little visitor,who has been with us for two and a half years now. There must be many many more couples who are part of the middle income sector that don’t qualify for medical cards and will not be able to afford fertility treatment. Why limit help to those only on medical cards?

    Reply
    • I imagine that, as a charity, Pomegranate has to have some limit somewhere for selection of beneficiaries. From looking at their website just now it looks like these two women have set this up, in their own time, to make a difference in an area they feel strongly about. More power to them. I’ve never set up a charity, as can only imagine the time & effort it takes. I think it’s a little unreasonable to suggest that the set up & manage selection criteria, other that the one they have, at this stage of things.

      Fertility treatment is expensive, and I imagine that they’d like to financially support everyone they could, but surely they have to apply some objective criteria to support those who can least afford it? Maybe it’s not ideal, but fair play to the two for doing their bit – in their own spare time, as volunteers with the charity.

      Reply
    • Colm, typical middle class, why shouldn’t I get it free, because your taking care of yourself and your family , that’s why, you have made a decision not to go into further debt to have more children,

      Reply
    • Hi Colm – congrats on your little visitor! We would dearly love to be able to help everyone who approaches us but we have very limited funds (we rely solely on donations) and we don’t have the resources to means test potential candidates so we have to rely on the fact that they have already been means tested already when applying for a medical card. We do keep everyone’s details on file just in case we get a windfall from somewhere. But I agree that there are thousands of couples out there that don’t qualify for a medical card and still can’t afford 5k a go for IVF. All we can do is keep talking about it and try and bring the whole issue out of the closet.

      Reply
    • Well said Colm, while your motives seem very generous once more the working poor are kicked to the curb………

      Reply
  • I agree should not be limited to.medical card holders. The barrier has been lowered in terms of affordability for people for treatments like IVF. It is not good enough.

    Reply
    • If you feel the work they are doing is not good enough, why don’t you do something?? It is too easy to criticise but these are people who decided to give something back to society and if you don’t like their charity there is nothing to stop you doing parallel work raising funds for couples who don’t have a medical card.

      Reply
  • @ rs Downey

    Ivf is not without risks, no medical procedure is and indeed there are risks associated with any kind of pregnancy. No couple going through ivf goes into it with their eyes closed.

    Infertility is a medical condition ( world health organisation) and ivf is not a ‘vanity driven’ medical procedure, as suggested by your post. If you want to inject objectivity try and inject some that is not based on your lack of knowledge regarding infertility and it’s treatment.

    Reply
  • “@paula.

    Dead right. Also because of the Hague convention, children from third world countries are not available for adoption to Irish couples because their countries have not ratified the convention ( rs downey take note). The waiting lists for countries that have ratified the convention are years ( and as someone has posted already you may not get a child at the end of it). The cost for international adoption can rack up to 30-40000 euro. Domestic adoption is nowadays rare ( not because people don’t want to adopt) and is not available to couples over mid thirties.
    Ps rs Downey all babies inherit genetic traits from their biological parents…er um that’s how biology works! An ignorant statement from your part to suggest that people who are infertile, want children and go own the ivf route are selfish.

    Reply
  • Good article highlighting an area impacting many couples. My only question is where would the money come from to make this happen in our health system, maybe covered if you have heath insurance?

    Reply
  • We challenge the human rights? Of women every day if they lack the cash, cant afford to travel ( no abortion )
    Can’t afford fertility treatment ( no baby)
    And yet we spend most time complaining about what single unmarried women receive from the state
    Social welfare is to enable the less fortunate people to feel they are part of our society it’s not just charity,
    Let them have the treatment in the interest of fairness, but watch as their middle class neighbours, bitch about how unfair it is on them,
    PS never been on welfare myself thank god

    Reply
    • Shay,no-one is bitching about social welfare recipients here. And I was in no way having any kind of a go at the women who set up the foundation to help couples conceive. I merely wish to make the point that it is good to see attention being drawn to what is a huge issue for many people. As for the remark about the rate of childbirth in the third world, the fact that thousands of children die in Africa every year is not relevant to the subject here. One point that is worth making is that the amount of money being spent on gender transformation might indeed be better used in other areas. But again,that’s a different issue. The whole area of fertility treatment in Ireland needs to be regulated as there are a lot of sharks out there preying on those who are trying to have children but can’t.

      Reply
    • @ shay

      What about low income earners who don’t receive social welfare and are being screwed every which way possible by austerity measures as is.

      Reply
    • Irene, that’s life, if they give it to welfare participants, you can always give up work and join them if it means that much to you

      Reply
    • @ shay

      “that’s life” you say… That would be the equivalent of me saying tough s@it to someone who lost their job! By the way, if I give up my job voluntarily I would not be entitled to social welfare. Also I suppose you are more than happy to say “that’s life” to people who are self employed, their income has gone down hill due to recession and they are not entitled to any benefit.

      Merry Christmas shay, you’ re all heart.

      Reply
    • Irene, do you mean you get nothing that’s not means tested , or do you mean the state would let you starve,

      Reply
    • @shay

      I doubt I would get job seekers allowance for a start. As for any other payments, I really don’t know shay, I don’t know how to ‘work’ the social welfare system. This article is about people getting assistance for ivf. That assistance should not be there for just those on social welfare. The working poor are struggling too shay ( those employed and self employed).

      Reply
    • Irene I am working poor, lol, still can’t agree, however respect your right to see things differently, ps like your honesty , the state may help , like you I don’t know how the welfare system works, but will always say thank god I haven’t had to know ,

      Reply
    • @shay. In that case, as you are among ‘the working poor’ hope you have not nor ever will have the experience of trying to pay for expensive necessary medical procedures (whatever that procedure is) that are not regulated, not covered by health insurance etc, nor there is any assistance for whatsoever.

      Reply
    • Irene,, I know and pay the 144 for medicines weekly for my family, but unfortunately that is our lot, also 50euro for the doctor is a scandal , and 170 for a consultant, we could go on, money is limited for the state and decisions have to made, both by the individual and the state

      Reply
    • @shay

      144 Weekly? Really, per week? For ‘your family’?

      According to your twitter your kids have flown the coupe and you are a nurse. A nurses salary is hardly considered to be the ‘working poor’ which you claim to be.

      Good luck and goodbye.

      Reply
    • Irene I’m the sole bread winner in my family, yes a member of my family is sick and that’s what has to be payed, many trips to consultants have to be payed, the 144 is the most that can be payed , the government does assist above that level, I have been paying this for over three years, that’s life for me and many more people ,

      Reply
    • Irene , hope you have a great Christmas, and the new year improves your financial situation, really I do

      Reply
    • Irene , hope you have a great Christmas, and that the new year improves your financial situation, really I do

      Reply
    • Ps it’s per month for medicine

      Reply
    • @shay

      You said 144 weekly.

      While not negating your own situation the article is about infertility treatment which racks into thousands and thousands. As a nurse you must be aware that it is not regulated and what that means for people ( including price of ivf).

      Perhaps you think the system is fair and the status quo should stay the same and we should all ‘accept our lot’ . Perhaps you think infertile couples should put up and shut up ( given that you have had children and therefore have no clue about infertility – though as a nurse i would hope you would have some notion and show better understanding).

      You are entitled to your opinion of course but I for one ( and many others who pay taxes) believe there should be better affordable acces to health for all that is properly regulated. Did this government not promise universal healthcare system ( and are still ‘talking’ about it)? We are rapidly heading toward a situation where only the wealthy and those on social welfare can go to see a gp, get access to medication etc. Meanwhile we carry on and pay the bond holders.

      I hope your family member’s medical condition is one which comes under proper regulation and is covered by health insurance. Ivf, which is what this article IS about, neither comes under health insurance or is properly regulated ( despite the commision report in 2005- see article).

      However its christmas day and there is no point in attempting to argue any more with you shay, you clearly have no empathy or even sympathy for working people who are struggling with infertility and struggling to pay for it. But sure carry on, point score away and indulge the ego. Or perhaps pick an article which bears some relevance to your life.

      Ps you have jumped to big conclusions regarding my personal situation. But, reading your previous posts tisnt the first time you jump to conclusions including the big ‘sweep’ you made at the middle class ( which is rapidly disintegrating in society due to austerity). Thanks for the ‘concern’ though and happy Christmas.

      Reply
    • That’s me told

      Reply
  • To add some balance, may I point out that Infertility and medical intervention in this area is for me the pinnacle of first world problems.
    Many babies born through IVF etc inherit there parents genetic traits including fertility issues.

    In third world countries, a child under five dies every five seconds. First world countries spend billions every year to assuage our pride and selfishness. Plastic surgery, IVF, anti-ageing and the list goes on.

    Lets have sone perspective please.

    Reply
    • Your talking about natural selection here.

      Reply
    • If adoption wasn’t so expensive and such an ordeal I would gladly offer to help 3rd world children and adopt an orphaned baby but it can cost at least twice the rate of IVF and the patents are not guaranteed a child at the end either.
      The system has no beneficial options for childless couples- we just have to struggle and try pay ourselves while the politicians give our money to the banks and themselves.

      Reply
    • IVF, is different to plastic surgery but I see your point, I can’t agree that private health insurance shouldn’t cover IVF,

      Reply
    • I refuse to see how IVF is selfish or vain. Do you regard all couples who want children as vain and selfish? I may need help conceiving, I would like a child with my partner when the time is right. What will you refer to me as then? The barren bitch who was too selfish to adopt? Get a life. Your point might as well be why does ANYONE want kids of their own when there are children in need of adoption the world over. How many have you adopted so far rsdowney? I’d love to know.

      Reply
  • @ Irene
    I did not suggest adoption as a solution. I wondered why the first world spends billions on vanity driven medical procedures.

    Read the research with respect to reproductive statistics on children born to parents who had difficulty carrying pregnancy to full term.

    Rather than addressing me with emotive subjective terms, try a little used thing called objectivity.

    Happy Christmas.

    Reply
  • Colm if you skip a line between points , then it wouldn’t look as if I had made any but the first,

    Reply

Add New Comment