TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

RTÉ to stay 50-50 for referendum debates – but news coverage ‘cannot be prejudged’

The national broadcaster is dropping a ‘stopwatch’ system for news broadcasts, but will keep it for formal debates.

The seven candidates in last year's Presidential election, preparing for the RTÉ Prime Time debate with Miriam O'Callaghan.
The seven candidates in last year's Presidential election, preparing for the RTÉ Prime Time debate with Miriam O'Callaghan.
Image: Photocall Ireland

RTÉ HAS INSISTED it will retain its 50-50 balance for the Yes and No sides in formal debates on the forthcoming Children’s Rights referendum – but says it cannot prejudge the content of its broader news ocverage.

In a statement this lunchtime the broadcaster said it remained the position that RTÉ would “balance the yes and no sides 50-50″ when participating in formal debates on programmes like Prime Time or The Frontline.

It added, however, that RTÉ’s broader news coverage would be “driven by the news agenda on a day to day basis”.

“Coverage will be impartial and objective,” it said. “While news coverage cannot be prejudged, as always RTÉ will monitor and review its coverage throughout the campaign.”

The statement follows a report in today’s Sunday Business Post suggesting that the national broadcaster would revise the ‘stopwatch’ system used in its other news broadcasts, under which campaigners for the Yes and No sides are given precisely equal amounts of airtime.

The revisions have come about because of the unusually one-sized nature of the current campaign, with all the major political parties seeking a Yes vote and only a handful of smaller groups advocating a No vote.

RTÉ’s current stance on 50-50 coverage stems from the Supreme Court ruling in the McKenna case in 1995, when it was found that state funds could not be spent on a campaign favouring one side of a referendum over another.

That complaint dealt with actions of the government of the day, however, and not RTÉ itself – which was not ordered by the court to impose the strict 50-50 model it has used ever since.

Other than its obligation to offer time to the Referendum Commission for the broadcast of informational videos, RTÉ has no formal obligations with respect to referendum coverage beyond its usual obligation to offer balanced and impartial coverage in all current affairs broadcasting.

Read: Noonan asks RTÉ to reconsider 50-50 rule for children’s rights referendum

Read next:

Comments (11 Comments)

  • Sam 14/10/12 #

    What is the credible reason for voting no?

    Reply
    • I am as yet undecided. I see the government making no real effort to enrich Children’s lives in fact the opposite seem to be the case. I’d like concrete examples of how children are at the moment suffering because we don’t have this amendment in place and proof that current laws can’t be used to protect these children. I am very uncomfortable with giving more power to the State when so many children suffered in State care. I will listen to the debates.

      Reply
    • I was very impressed with Kathy Sinnott on Today with Pat Kenny last week. She presented good reasons for voting no which I hadn’t considered before. Worth listening back to.

      Reply
  • I know that this will be used as a stick to beat RTÉ with by those who always have reasons to vent about the public broadcaster, however I have to say that this does seem to be fair enough on their part.

    If RTÉ tried to stick to the normal 50/50 rule for news coverage then it could lead to impossible situations e.g. if there is a day when two parties on the Yes side held campaign events, and the No side held no events it would mean that the Yes events could not be reported as there wouldn’t be balance.

    Reply
    • There are two ways to ensure balance. One is quantitative and uses a stopwatch. It is easy to monitor this. The second is qualitative and is harder to monitor and is arguably more important. This refers to the way in which a broadcaster can frame the debate, and ask one side easy questions while always putting the other side on the defensive. This probably has a bigger impact on public opinion than a slight imbalance in the use of time.

      Reply
    • The 50/50 rule is not a daily thing – it’s over the course of the campaign. So two yes campaigns on the same day could be covered so long as extra time was given to the no campaign at a later date.

      Reply
  • is pat the plank chairing this

    Reply
  • Let the debate role on. There are many credible and critical reasons why a no vote is right. Not least the fact that the referendum has nothing to do with children’s rights and everything to do with the rights of the state.

    Reply
  • The 50:50 rule also pertains to the Coughlan Judgeent which specifically mandated it or referendum broadcasting in 1997.

    Reply

Add New Comment