Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Owen Humphreys/PA
its grand

Calm down: Higher radiation levels at Sellafield were just 'background radon'

All non-essential staff at the site were asked not to report to work this morning because of the elevated radiation levels detected overnight.

SELLAFIELD HAS CONFIRMED that the higher radioactivity detected by one of the site’s in-air monitors overnight was actually “naturally occurring background radon”.

The nuclear power plant said this is not attributable to any issue of problem with an operations on the site.

“Our in-air monitors are extremely sensitive and pick up on any abnormality,” it said in a statement. “Overnight the monitoring system initially indicated elevated levels of activity. Following investigation and analysis, we can now confirm these levels to be naturally occurring background radon.”

This morning all non-essential staff at the site were asked not to report to work because of the elevated radiation levels.

All of our plants and storage facilities were quickly confirmed as operating normally, and we were always confident that the issue posed no risk to the workforce or public because the levels being detected, whilst above background radiation levels, were still low.

Standard weekend working operations will now continue with day staff returning on Monday as normal.

Read: Sellafield says there is ‘no risk to public’ because of elevated radiation levels>

Related: Sellafield facilities “do not meet modern standards” – UK nuclear watchdog

Your Voice
Readers Comments
29
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.