TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Senior management at RTÉ to step aside during Fr Reynolds inquiries

The producer and reporter on the programme which libelled Fr Kevin Reynolds will also step aside.

Image: Photocall Ireland

Updated 6.05pm

RTÉ HAS ANNOUNCED that the managing director of news and the station’s current affairs editor are to step aside during the two inquiries into its libelling of Fr Kevin Reynolds.

In a tweet from RTÉ News this evening, the station said that RTÉ News MD Ed Mulhall and Current Affairs editor Ken O’Shea are to step aside for the duration of the station’s internal inquiry and the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland’s inquiry that was announced by the government yesterday.

The station also said that the executive producer of the Prime Time Investigates programme in question, Brian Páircéir, and the reporter of the story, Aoife Kavanagh, will not involved in on-air programming during the inquiries.

The programme’s producer Mark Lappin has since left RTÉ and now works as a senior producer of CNN’s ‘Connect the World’.

The station was ordered to pay damages to the Catholic priest at the High Court last week following a broadcast in May of this year which falsely claimed that Fr Reynolds had raped a teenage girl and fathered a child with her while working as a missionary in Kenya in the 1980s.

RTÉ later admitted the story was “wholly untrue” and it was revealed that the station went ahead with the programme despite Fr Reynolds denying the allegations and legal correspondence to the same effect.

Six-One news presenter Bryan Dobson has tweeted to say that Mulhall told staff this evening he was stepping down during the investigation “to protect “objectivity” & “integrity” of RTE News.”

Accountability

RTÉ said in a statement that the decision was made “to remove any possible doubt ” about the objectivity of the station.

Speaking on the Six One news, the RTÉ Authority chairman Tom Savage said the decisions were about “sending out the right signals of accountability” and said the station “must be seen to be accountable.”

Yesterday, the government ordered an inquiry into the how the station broadcast the libellous allegations in order to “determine the true facts and circumstances” which led to the story being aired.

Later the broadcaster said it was suspending the next season of Prime Time Investigates until all of its sources have been fully examined and its procedures looked at it in light of the Fr Reynolds case.

Earlier today, the Communications Minister Pat Rabbitte said it was important to establish the full facts of the matter before any sackings or resignations took place.

“The questions surround why was the programme was published in the first instance, given what we have learned so far,” Rabbitte said this morning. “But my impression is that the management understand the gravity of it since.”

RTÉ’s internal review is expected to report by 15 December while the BAI has been given two months to carry out its inquiry.

Read: RTÉ suspends next season of Prime Time Investigates after Fr Reynolds case >

Pat Rabbitte: Heads should not roll at RTÉ… yet >

Read next:

Comments (27 Comments)

  • Once upon a time people were suspended.

    Now they ‘step aside’ – a phrase I first heard from the mouth of Charlie Haughey.

    When people get suspended again, we will be back to the pre-Haughey era, and getting somewhere.

    Reply
  • This should be simple, the person responsible for putting this slander out on the airwaves should resign. They have wasted millions of taxpayers (our) money and continue to do so by still avoiding responsibility. If this was the bbc resignations would have been tendered already

    Reply
  • They should not just step side , they should be sacked. They think they have the God given right to slander innocent people.

    Reply
  • “Earlier today, the Communications Minister Pat Rabbitte said it was important to establish the full facts of the matter before any sackings or resignations took place.” Who honestly believes that an internal rte inquiry will establish such facts?

    Reply
  • andyh 23/11/11 #

    its about time some investigative journalism was used in examining the approaches that have become predominant particularly in programmes such as primetime investigates over the last two years. whilst acknowledging the tremendous exposes, the journalists have been on a power trip recently with sensationalism and a refusal to accept or acknowledge “good news” in their pursuit of their story. the style of reportage has become tabloid in nature with the use of music and backdrops completely out of context.

    Reply
  • thats great they can step a side and do some gardening while taking down their fat payslips, have they found something for Charlie Bird to do yet. .or even Finnucan, couldnt one of them take on a more demanding role, given their total on-air output is four hours per week for a combined salary close on 1 million

    Reply
  • Eire 23/11/11 #

    RTE is a broadcaster suitable for a Banana Republic or a Dictatorship where no one is at fault & everyone still gets paid a hell of a good place to work second only to the Dail

    Reply
  • Yes I can. , it means keep getting paid keep your job keep your pension it’s everything that’s wrong in this country no one takes the blame and get sacked ( public sector) anyway

    Reply
    • Stepping aside was what Fr. Reynolds did when RTE accused him and refused to wait for the paternity test. Lucky for him there is such a thing. If it had been a few years ago, the RTE shower wouldn’t stepping aside, they would be stepping all over everyone and anyone they could vilify and destroy, especially if they happened to be Catholic.

      Reply
  • Can anyone please explain what “stepping aside” means?

    Reply
  • Here is a novel idea, a saying that is used all over the world but has never reached Ireland ” heads must roll ” ……

    Reply
  • It’s such a pity that such a reckless move will more than likely put in jeopardy the great journalism of so many others. This, if as portrayed, looks to be a phenomenal misjudgment by RTE, its journalists and producers. With so many checks and balances in place I’m confused as to how it could have occurred.

    What is most odd is that RTE had no investigation done at the time of settlement, when it clearly knew it was in the wrong.

    Reply
    • How can you call this a misjudgement?. This was the deliberate making of a programme which they must have known would seriously damage Fr. Reynolds good name and with so much at stake, RTE couldn’t wait for the paternity test and had to put their ‘story’ out and did it in such a way that got the message across degrading and vilifying Fr. Reynolds without any care or concern for whether he was guilty or not. They are a disgrace to the profession of journalism.

      Reply
  • You must be looking for a job in RTE.
    Why edit my comments as my point was not crude or legally threatening?
    I simply would like to know will anybody go to jail for this as if you don’t pay your TV licence you will go to jail they say.

    Reply
  • The priest was wrongly accused . and justice was done. Now it has to be seen to be done . I am not sure what stepping aside really means . There will be a big investigation and in two months time a result will be issued and every one will be restored to their current positions with one possible exception and that will be Aoife Kavanagh! She after all is the reporter and lowest in the food chain ,altho she did not have the authority to run with the story … The tax payers (us) will be appeased and all will be forgotten. I like Prime Time, but of late there did seem to be too many ”personalities” on it instead of the validity of the stories. Maybe some pruning is in order !!!

    Reply
  • Where are the criminal charges against the pedophile priests of this country!? Liable is misdemeanour compared to what the catholic church has gotten away with.

    Reply
    • One thing to note is that the clergy are responsible for 2-3% of all abuse cases in this country. There’s no spotlight on the other 97% as there is on the church. Certainly the church as an institution engaged in a deceitful cover up of what happened. It’s time for a refocus – are we missing the point?

      I think this case shows how easy it was for a news organisation to jump on the bandwagon and go down a well trodden route to an audience that would happily agree with everything that was presented as fact.

      Reply
    • Brian, can you provide a link to those figures for me.Thanks

      Reply
    • I believe brian is refering to the savi report from 2002 – http://www.drcc.ie/about/savi.pdf the actuall figure is 3.6% if memory serves me correctly. The real shame is that the goverment never commisioned a follow up report, but the figures back up brian’s argument.

      Reply
    • Thanks for that Jimmy. Didn’t mean to come across as not agreeing, just genuinely curious.

      Reply
    • Is the report that old? the figure and the report was quoted on Vincent Brown of Weds night. They also quoted research that indicated that the average person considerably over estimated the level of abuse committed by clergy. This does not lessen the fact that it happens only that we are pre-occupied with one group of wrong doers it and are not really looking at the other 96-97 per cent.

      Reply
    • I expect you mean ‘libel’. There are quite a few priests in prison. There are a lot of abusers/paedophiles who are responsible for 96 per cent of child abuse cases and I wonder have they been checked out?

      Reply
    • In any event it was defamation, not libel, as it was brought under the 2009 Act. Pretty poor reporting here by thejournal when they can’t even get the terminology correct.

      Reply

Add New Comment