We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
FIANNA FÁIL SENATOR Marc MacSharry has defended his criticism of online forums yesterday saying that his view that they amounted to “legalised subversion of the State” was taken out of context.
Speaking in the Seanad yesterday, the senator said: “When people are tweeting, texting or online, for example, on boards.ie and Politics.ie. In my view that does not amount to free speech, but legalised subversion of the State. It is fundamentally wrong.”
He was the subject of considerable criticism on both websites yesterday but he defended his comments today.
Mac Sharry insisted that he was speaking in the context of the misuse of a tweet during the RTÉ Frontline presidential debate, an incident which he said “had the potential to subvert the State”.
Speaking to TheJournal.ie today Mac Sharry denied that he was attacking Boards.ie or Politics.ie saying that: “There will be people who choose to interpret this as a personal attack on fora. It certainly isn’t that. It’s the fact that we need to look at all of these areas. I am pro-free speech.
“What I meant and the whole train of the debate was on standards in the media relative to the misuse of kinds of social media and online media as a reputable source that is unverified. In that context, the misuse of them by traditional media can be subversive.”
He said the criticism of him on Politics.ie, which he noted ran to some 50 pages and had, he said, been described to him by some as “frenzied engagement” was “focusing on a context that wasn’t there”.
Mac Sharry echoed his party’s call for a public inquiry into RTÉ’s use of the ‘bogus tweet’ and the overall editorial processes behind the controversial final presidential debate last October.
“Everybody who was involved in it [the Frontline debate] all feel this is something that shouldn’t have happened,” he said.
“It is something that had a bearing on the outcome. I’m not saying it would have changed the outcome but it changed the actual result in terms of votes. It was the Frontline that did that”.
“We need to understand how it happened and why it happened. There needs to be an independent inquiry but far be it from me to dictate how that should happen.”
The Taoiseach said yesterday that the government would not be ordering a review of the Frontline programme while the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland, which has already adjudicated on the ‘bogus tweet’, said there was no reason to review that decision.
The BAI last week upheld former presidential candidate Seán Gallagher’s complaint over the programme, ruling that the “broadcast of a tweet incorrectly attributed to the official Martin McGuinness for President Twitter account was unfair to the complainant.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
At least we know how he feels about free speech, laughable
Starting to retract what he said or trying to re-spin what he said?
Yep, he’s a standard FF politician!
unbelievable that a member of the senate should come out with rubbish like this. if anything, HE is the one who is ‘subverting’: subverting the right of people to express themselves freely in the forums of their choice. a real killer to think that we are paying this man’s wages and then he makes worthless pronouncements like this (the kind of thing that would be dismissed instantly or laughed off if he was to make it here for example, yet because they are made in the senate they are taken serioulsy. same goes for norris (senator and tv critic) and his comments yesterday. if they are trying to highlight the uselessness of the senate they are doing a good job!
Cant take the heat?
He is a Gobsh1te.
Sorry, That was written out of context.
The quote in the second paragraph shows he wasn’t speaking out of context. Maybe he didn’t mean to phrase it that way but it shows a big contempt for social media and free expression online. Boooo.
It’s a contempt for the right of people to set their own agenda,where the likes of Mark cannot call up editors or journalists etc etc to spin an article. In the modern era, it is harder to hide his parties activities in the dark corridors and car parks of hotels.
He could not care less if it is online or offline. This is a man whose father had to resign as part of a scandal in the Haughey years over the bugging of journalists in 1983.
When you grow up in that kind of house how can one expect to know right from wrong. He had no chance, the poor kid. At least he connections were able to get him a 100k job in the Seanad.
Give me subversion of the State any day over outright FF treason of the State.
His rambling attack on free speech was probably down to stress caused by the fact that his family are caught up in a court case concerning development land and property. This is a man who was tipped to be a future leader of FF by the Sindo. Crikey, if he can’t keep his cool around the stress of court cases then he is hardly fit to be a cllr for that party.
You may be familiar with his daddy, Ray McSharry. He had to resign from the Govt. in the 1982 after being caught in possession of Gardaí bugging devices he was using to record his cabinet colleagues. He said he got them from the then Justice Minister Seán Doherty who was bugging journalists homes and phones and shown to be interfering with criminal cases for personal and political gain.
Apart from having a poor grounding in ethics and public service from the family side, McSharry has proven that he does not have the intellectual horsepower to be a public rep. Time for him to have his daddy arrange a new job for him.
Bugger!
“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?… Has it ever occurred to your, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?… The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking-not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.”
- George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 5
Will Martin the Reformer discipline him?
I think governments around the world and here are really scared of the Internet and the power it gives the little man.
AlanV.
they are terrified of us having a voice and that we will join the ”dots” and realise what they are really up to ….
The Irish Spring will start any day now.
@skeolawn,
Sadly, I don’t think it likely. We as a nation, for the most part are too content with our lives. Most people have homes, electricity, running water, food etc. We haven’t yet been pushed out of our comfort zones and nothing dramatic will happen until that does happen.
We had our chance a year ago to shake it all up, and nothing has changed, just the party in charge.
Please don’t think that I believe we should shut up or anything, but the fact is, we’re too apathetic in our politics because we no longer have severe hardship (bar a small amount of people).
@Seán
You say we had our chance to “shake it all up” but what do you mean? Who would we elect instead of our current government and what would you have liked them to do? Is the fact that nothing has changed perhaps to be seen as a vindication of the decisions of the outgoing government in their twilight months rather than an indictment of the present lot? Ultimately, despite the leftist zeitgeist we are NOT on the streets regularly enough to justify the cynicism that many people here and elsewhere online/across the media seem to present as omnipresent in Irish society.
I’m not saying I think this government is overly impressive but what exactly is so bad about it, given the reality of our situation? The left will always be up in arms in times of recession and that is good because it is the most vulnerable that take the biggest hits. But does the left have to collapse into sniping cynicism? Why can’t we try to have some discussion in this country where the left forfeits it’s self-righteous indignation and actually attempts to convince conservative Ireland that its ambitions can be reasonable as well as noble?
I’m no undercover blueshirt – just tired of the cynicism, tired of the self-indulgent detachment. This is OUR country and though the buck stops with government WE are the ones that are responsible.
The thread on politics.ie contains little ‘frenzied engagement’ but is rather aimed at taking the proverbial out of him.
There is an uncomfortable level of negative interest from this government regarding online freedom, be that in terms of speech or actions we can take. I foresee this heading towards the Powers that be attempting to regulate the Internet ala the newspapers. I think they hate not having a mouthpiece online like rte or the sindo.
People, why can you not all just do what FFG/Labour tell you to do .. FFS, stop this non-compliance and become good little droids for the established parties, and then they will be happy… Pay your household charges, and what was the new bill brought in bg FG 2 weeks ago to restrict internet freedom???
And no more sarcastic comments by anyone about FFG/Labour. This is against the states wishes.
1984 … Big Brother is watching you and is not happy ….
Anyone who doesnt comply to the established parties is a “Shinner” and shoul be sent for re-education ….
Ahh to hell with the subtle attacks … FFG/Labour want to control us .. They can go fcuk themselves. I will not be put in a corner and told not to challenge these crooks and their idiotic decisions.
The comments from this senator are a throwback to a Victorian period when the people’s “betters” knew where to draw the line. Does he travel in and out by horseless carriage?
Sad, all the same, when a member of the Seanad has to state that he is pro free speech. I mean, shouldn’t that be a given for a democrat?
He’s not pro free speech. His comments show he’s actually against free speech.
However, “free speech” is one of those interesting things that everybody has to see to be pro – even if they’re against. Like the way racists can’t accept that they are actually racists – because everybody knows being a racist is a “bad thing”. Orwellian indeed.
He didn’t mention TheJournal.ie.
We need to try harder.
He did when I spoke to him earlier but only in the context of lumping it in with any other website such as Facebook and Twitter. His general point was that he was referring to online media and platforms on whole.
Marc McSharry, son of Ray, estate agent, career senator, gobshite!
another senator talking shite…two in the one week
Yip total gobshite with a very low IQ. Where would he be without his daddy? This fool never stood on his own two feet . . Never!
Himself and Leo Varadkar should form their own political party, the PDs. Protests Denied Party. Do these people realise how anti-democratic their comments seem to some people, including anyone with an IQ?
Yeah the riots in the Uk scared the shit out of them
Shall we shut up like he wants us to ?
Shall we like F**K … No we will continue to have our say ,
and discuss the politicians and their lack of ”character” :)
this guy is a real chip off the old block!
Marc bought a massive bank of land along with a group of his Daddy’s friends in Hazelwood, Sligo – what he is defending at the moment is that he and this buddies didn’t immediately flip the Green Belt/Unlined land deal to a larger group of ‘investors’ and thereby removing the need for Cash advancement to the bank for the original finance loan (now in a state controlled institution – no doubth) This ‘Senetor’ is a walking example of what is still wrong with FF and is reason enough for a call to abolish the Seanad
With the amount of comments that are frequently removed from this site while not breaching any code except some personal secret code of the censor/editor, I thought that Marc McSharry had a job with the Journal
John
His party are not in power tho …. :)
The man has a point, but it’s not so much subversion of the state, more that the kind of people who spend more of their time posting online are the kind of people who have the time and inclination to do so.
translation?
Being fully aware that “My comments were taken out of context…” is quite a standard defence when people say silly things, it should be noted that considering he was speaking in the context of #tweetgate, it would appear that his comments were genuinely taken out of context…
Calm down p.ie warriors!!
There’s nothing wrong with expressions of opinion. The problem it seems to me is the opinion offered there is often bile and that’s probably what Mac Sharrey was driving at.
Why was my earlier post removed?
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
Non-TCF/GVL Vendors
have your say