TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

The stranger bits of Finance Bill 2012: from cricket to Islamic finance

Here are three of the more unusual elements of the Finance Bill 2012…

Image: barryskeates via Creative Commons

THE FINANCE BILL 2012 was published yesterday by Minister for Finance Michael Noonan and among the Mortgage Interest Relief measures and tax changes for businesses, the Bill also clarified the following (more unusual) elements of Irish taxation:

1. Bread

The Finance Bill 2012 clarifies the range of bread products, including bagels and blaas, which will not be liable for VAT and will instead remain designated at a zero rate of tax.

The zero-rated breads include loaves, rolls, batch bread, bagels, baps, blaas, burger buns, finger rolls, wraps, naan breads and pitta bread.

Other flour- or egg-based bakery products are subject to VAT of 13.5 per cent.

The Department of Finance said that the breads listed above are being designated zero-rated for tax in an effort to reflect the kinds of bread currently available on the market while taking into account the development of bread for health and ethnic reasons.

2. Cricket

The Finance Bill had some good news for professional cricket players: they are being added to the list of professional sportspersons entitled to tax relief on certain income.

The move also means that the cricketers will be eligible for a higher rate of relief on pension contributions.

Other sportspersons covered by this  are: athletes, boxers, cyclists, golfers, motor racing drivers, footballers, rugby players, swimmers, jockeys, and tennis, squash and badminton players.

They must be resident in the state for the relevant tax assessment period to qualify and the deduction only applies to direct sports earnings (less expenses) and not for indirect income earned through promotional appearances or sponsorship.

3. Islamic Finance

The Finance Bill also includes enhancements to the tax regime for Islamic finance.

This area of finance in Ireland, which although faith-based is not limited to Muslims, was introduced in the Finance Act 2010, and refers to financial transactions which are consistent with the principles of Islamic or Sharia law.

Under Islamic finance, the payment and receipt of interest is forbidden. Speculation is also prohibited, while investment in unethical businesses, products or services is also banned. According to the Revenue Commissioners, under Islamic finance, transactions are typically backed by or based on an identifiable and tangible underlying asset.

The transactions also involve sharing risk between the investor and the investee, and products under Islamic finance operate along the same lines as conventional financial products by using familiar legal structures in an alternative way to achieve the financing objectives.

The Finance Bill published yesterday proposes technical changes to certain Islamic financial transactions in the same way as conventional financial transactions by allowing such a company to have other income in addition to income from leasing and/or income from specified financial transactions.

Read: Finance Bill 2012 – here are the main points >

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • The blaa…the ethnic food of Waterford!

    Reply
  • Sounds like our immoral, greed driven bankers should go on an Islamic Finance course ……. And let them eat the bread with VAT on it!

    Reply
    • They did. In 2008 the Islamic Cultural Centre ran courses in Sharia’a Finance for Irish bankers.

      Call it Ijara-wa-iktana; call it Ijara with diminishing Musharakra; call it what you wish, it is still interest on a loan, albeit dressed up like hire-purchase to circumvent the prohibition on making money from money.

      Reply
    • Looks like they did not pay much attention. They do not seem to be changing their ways.

      Reply
  • Does anybody have any idea of how many Professional cricketers are resident in Ireland?

    Reply
  • There shouldn’t be a separate finance system for different religions. It doesn’t help with integration.

    Reply
  • integrate them with who?. . . May i ask?

    Reply
  • That sounds like sustainable finance – why don’t we all try it for a change. Debt with interest is only ‘sustainable’ in the context of eternal growth. If we keep allowing our banks to mass produce debt, we’ve only two options, neither of them healthy.

    No growth = wrecked lives, no jobs, no services, people turned into debt slaves.

    Growth = wrecked planet, pollution everywhere, resources used up, habitat destroyed, food and water supply poisoned and eventually, back to no growth and see above…

    Reply
  • Sound lads, leaving us off the VAT on breads! I’ll sleep easy tonight ;-) We’re f*cked altogether if that is all they can come up with!!!

    Reply
  • For those of us who are not great on high finance here is what it all means – “….Would AIG, Citigroup, Dow Jones, HSBC, UBS, Visa and Mastercard have become involved with something called Apartheid Finance? Or Nazi Finance? Of course not. So why are they involved with Sharia Finance? ….But the danger to our national security is this: the hallmark of Iranian Banking (i.e., Sharia banking) is the hiring of mullahs or sheiks in order to have some control over banking practices and the mandate to send some profits off to “Sharia charities” (a process known as Zakat). Hiring Sharia sheiks gives these groups standing in the banking world and brands “Sharia” as perfectly ethical. Sending money to charity? What could be more ethical, and everyone is concerned about ethics these days…..So what do these sheiks actually do? One of their jobs is to ensure that somehow money from Sharia investments gets sent off to charity. The problem is that their definition of charity and the definition of charity according to most Americans are polar opposites….HSBC Amanah Website in its list of Sharia “charity” is “fi sabilillah.” This is defined in the Reliance of the Traveler, the Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law (Umdat Al-Salik), p. 272, as follows:
    “those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged In Islamic military operations for whom no salary has been allotted in the army, or volunteers for Jihad without remuneration. They are given enough to suffice them for the operation, even if affluent: of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses.”…..Wait a minute. Let me understand this, charitable payments go to the army? For people who are fighting for Allah? For Jihad? Is that really true? You’re damned right! According to Sharia Islamic law, money for charity will be given to fight for Allah. And as previously demonstrated time and again, Muslim jihadist-terror organizations are indeed prominent Zakat recipients. In fact, the U.S. Government has classified 27 Islamic charities as terror organizations; most recently, the Holy Land Foundation in Dallas, Texas, was convicted of financing terrorism in 2008 and had been charged with funneling $12 million dollars to Hamas…..” – http://www.weeklyblitz.net/584/sharia-compliant-finance-financing-our-own-demise – This is what Sharia compliant banking is – Rene

    Reply
    • I agree that banking should not be diverted to the interests of small private groups, neither the weapons training you describe, nor the fabulous casino high rollers that benefit from our system.

      But we could certainly do with an opportunity to reconsider the idea that the creation of debt is necessary in order to ensure we all have enough trading tokens for obtaining the services and goods we need.

      Different points of view are always worth considering. We can take the ideas we need, and leave behind the ones we don’t want.

      Reply
    • While I think there is ethic merit in charging interest based on opportunity cost and risk management, the attack on Sharia Finance is nothing more than thinly veiled xenophobia.

      Most Muslims are decent and behind ridiculous Daily Mail headlines, most totally oppose violence. Of course there will always be a few, but that’s no different from the Castlerea Prisoners’ Wives’ Collections, which are fairly familiar to anybody who has been in a bar in south Boston.

      Reply

Add New Comment