TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

UN assembly hits out at Security Council failure on Syria

The Assembly overwhelmingly passed a resolution criticising the Security Council’s failure to act on the Syria conflict.

Syria's UN Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari, right, listens to speakers during a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly at the United Nations Friday, Aug. 3, 2012
Syria's UN Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari, right, listens to speakers during a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly at the United Nations Friday, Aug. 3, 2012
Image: Kathy Willens/AP/Press Association Images

THE UN GENERAL Assembly overwhelmingly passed a resolution Friday criticising the Security Council’s failure to act on the Syria conflict, which UN leader Ban Ki-moon said has become a “proxy war”.

The resolution, which condemned President Bashar al-Assad’s use of “heavy weapons” in his battle against the rebellion against his rule, was passed by 133 votes with 12 countries against and 31 abstaining.

Russia and China, which have vetoed three UN Security Council resolutions on Syria, were among high profile opponents of the resolution.

Frustration and anger

Many diplomats said Friday’s vote was a show of frustration and anger at the lack of international action on the conflict.

Though the resolution is not legally binding, there was increased attention on the General Assembly action after the resignation of UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan and the mounting battle for the Syrian city of Aleppo.

The resolution said members deplored “the Security Council failure to agree on measures” to make the Syrian government carry out UN demands to end almost 18 months of fighting.

It condemned “the Syrian authorities use of heavy weapons including indiscriminate shelling from tanks and helicopters” and demanded that the government refrain from using its chemical weapons.

Saudi Arabia drew up the resolution with Arab and western backing and its UN envoy said the success of the vote was “painful victory” because of events in Syria.

After the vote, Saudi Ambassador Abdallah al-Mouallimi told reporters the double vetoes gave “the impression that the Security Council was turning a blind eye to the painful reality.”

He said there was “a consensus that does not support the paralysis of the Security Council, a consensus that says the United Nations cannot be oblivious to the suffering of the Syrian people, a consensus that demands action.”

Call for Assad to stand down

During negotiations ahead of the vote, demands that the motion include a call for Assad stand down and a call for sanctions against his government were dropped because of opposition from non-aligned countries.

But it still welcomed an Arab League decision passed last month which calls for Assad to leave office.

Syria strongly opposed the resolution and its UN envoy, Bashar Jafaari accused Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Gulf states of arming rebel groups.

Jafaari said the resolution showed the “hypocrisy” of Saudi Arabia and that it would “no impact whatsoever”.

While US envoy Susan Rice welcomed the vote, many countries expressed reservations. South Africa, which voted in favor, said the resolution should have been tougher on the Syrian opposition.

The UN secretary general told the General Assembly the conflict has become a “proxy war” and that the international powers must overcome rivalries to end the violence.

Ban said growing radicalization and extremism had been predicted at the start of the conflict in March 2011.

“The next step was also forewarned: a proxy war, with regional and international players arming one side or the other. All of these dire predictions have come to pass,” Ban told the assembly.

Peace plan

Ban turned his fire on the Security Council saying it had become “paralyzed” by divisions over Syria despite calls for “consequences” to be imposed for not carrying out Annan’s peace plan.

“Now, with the situation having worsened, they must again find common ground. The immediate interests of the Syrian people must be paramount over any larger rivalries of influence.”

Ban said the Syria conflict “is a test of everything this organization stands for” and recalled a recent visit to Srebrenica, site of a massacre he called “one of the darkest chapters in this organization’s history.”

UN peacekeepers were accused of not doing enough to stop the slaughter of 8,000 Muslim boys and men in the Bosnian town in July 1995.

“I do not want today’s United Nations to fail that test. I want us all to show the people of Syria and the world that we have learned the lessons of Srebrenica,” the UN leader said.

Russia and China have justified their vetoes by saying western nations want to force the downfall of Assad.

- © AFP, 2012

Read: Mortars kill at least 20 in Damascus refugee camp

Read next:

Comments (37 Comments)

  • There shouldn’t be any country with a veto, period. Whether it’s China or Russia, or the US or anyone else. No one, or two countries should be able to block the majority to protect their own self intetests.

    Reply
  • Russia and China should be excluded from UN clearly they are not doing the right thing against the situation that is happening in Syria. This is wrong and should be addressed.

    Reply
    • Some Polish anti-Russian bias I suspect.

      Reply
    • Or a rational if flawed argument that they are demonstrably doing the wrong thing?

      Reply
    • The ones that are demonstrably doing wrong are the ones supplying arms and support to terrorists, and buying off diplomats. China and Russia should be commended for quenching the imperialist ambitions of the other lot at the UNSC table… Otherwise there would already be a full-scale regional war in the Middle East which would soon go global as the rest of the world suffers economic meltdown.

      That’s a rational argument

      Reply
    • No, it’s a speculative argument. Who are you labelling as terrorists here? What imperialist ambitions have Russia and China quenched? When and how?

      Why should China or Russia be commended for anything while flagrantly denying the fundamental rights of their own people?

      Reply
    • It’s all a part of the neo-liberal global conspiracy to take over the world one country at a time. What don’t you understand?

      In all seriousness, while people try to flex their brain cells by being the person who “gets it right” about Syria people are being killed on both sides over there. While we stand around with our fingers up certain body parts trying to denounce each others conspiracy theories.

      Reply
    • Iran is the real prize and Syria has been targeted because of their association. Regime overthrow in Syria is a preliminary step toward an invasion of Iran, an invasion which would have started already if Russia and China stepped aside.

      What happens at home in Russia/China is nothing compared to the consequences for all of us in the event of an attack on Iran

      Reply
    • @Imran are you for Real? Really you think that it’s just some kind of Poland against Russia thing? Stupid. Yeah speechless I am. I don’t care who is selling weapons to whom, what I care about is the fat that there are people dying there for a poxy long time now. Stupid ignorance of somebody who is narrow minded.

      Reply
    • Stupid? Who’s the one suggesting the UN simply kick Russia and China out?

      Reply
  • There is a world of difference between providing arms to a sovereign government and providing arms to paramilitaries a la CIA

    Reply
    • People were (rightly) quick to condemn when the US was arming that other Baathist dictator Saddam Hussein. It’s funny how malleable some people’s moral standards can be…

      Reply
    • That so called Sovereign Government are using the heavy weapons supplied by the Chinese and Russians against unarmed civilians. Weapons being used against the Regime are largely small calibre arms used primarily for defensive purposes.
      It is important to recall that the so called sovereign rulers of Syria have little legitimacy without the use of oppression against their own people.

      Reply
  • The above arguments about who is arming who and what America did hen is a distraction from the issue at hand. Thousands of innocent civilians are dead, many at the hand of their own government.

    Children are being shot at point blank range and having their throats cut in front of their families. There is widespread torture and the impending threat of chemical weapons.

    And the UN is powerless to do anything because of the veto of two nations with similar human rights backgrounds. Neither China nor Russia has any human rights credibility, the US and the UK aren’t spotless either but at least they treat their own citizens well.

    China and Russia fear similar uprisings in their own country and have spent years quashing the seeds of this type of civil rebellion. Look at the protests in Moscow, the imprisonment of Ang Wei Wei.

    This has nothing to do with East v West, it has to do with an ongoing massacre for which the Syrian government (either through direct action or unwillingness to negotiate) is responsible.

    Reply
    • *Ai Wei Wei

      Reply
    • The down thumbs there demonstrate how happily people will ignore mass suffering when there’s a populist anti-US conspiracy theory argument to be had. Don’t get me wrong, I think the US is fairly damnable in most of its doings in the international community and many in its own but that’s not the bloody issue here!

      This kind of nonsense is why the UN is so toothless. For shame. You’re all so pissed at the US for some half formed poorly researched reason that you’ll support China just to spite them even if what you’re supporting is a total lack of action to save innocent people. At least donate to the red cross for goodness sake.

      The Syrian people don’t care about conspiracy right now, they need food and water and safety, not an argument on neo-colonialism.

      Reply
    • We all know China and Russia are corrupt nations but Russia has 1 military base outside Russia and thats Syria. The US has nearly 200 military bases around the world and by official figures is by far the biggest supplier of arms to anyone that wants to buy them. I don’t think people are taking sides in this, its just the typical one sided view the press takes as if the west are little angels. Far more innocent people have been killed by American guns in the last 10 years than anyone else. Nearly 60% of US tax reciepts are spent on the American war machine and their has been massive protests in the US the same as China and Russia over the last year. The US is now offically a police state due to NDAA and anti protesting laws passed recently. U only have to look at the protests in Anahiem last week to see the Army with heavy weaponary facing down peaceful protesters. Can’t believe people are still fooled by the massive propaganda machine coming from the west. There ain’t no good guys in this, just the usual innocent victims in the middle east suffering because of power games between monsters.

      Reply
    • These arguments are riddled with bias. A big spiel about innocent civilians then into a load of finger pointing and accusations. Don’t pretend to be unbiased when you clearly are – i.e relying on Sky news for the updates.

      Reply
    • It would be great if we could trust the nice Americans and British to have no ulterior motives in this, but the same thing is happening every day in “Democratic Republic” of Congo. Is there any talk of supporting “regime change”? No.

      Forgive me for not trusting America and the United KIngdom to have their hands clean on this one. I’d have thought people would have learned the lessons of Iraq…

      Reply
  • Well said Brend. It’s clear to see that a lot of people are swallowing the western media perspective on Syria. Mainly that the uprising was not instigated by external forces and that the rebels are you heading viewed as some romantic movement. These so called rebels are nothing more than armed mercenaries, armed gangs and Islamic jihadists. The Syrian government has every right to defend itself from US imperial aggression(dressed up as the UN). I would not put too much trust in Ban Ki Moon. This is the same guy who said the UN observers came under attack by armoured vehicles of the Syrian regime when the UN observers had been attacked by armed ‘rebels’ with small arms fire. So, believe what is being dished out to you at your peril.

    Reply
  • Russia and China are not arming anyone in this conflict, the US is. Who is causing the most deaths then? This entire conflict has been engineered by NATO to destabilise Iran. Russia and China deserve no condemnation.

    Reply
    • They are only supplying loads of weapons openly, thru the sea ports which then is used to kill innocent civilians.
      Yea – Russia and China are innocent!

      Reply
    • Not arming anyone. Good one. For a minute there I thought you were serious.

      If you are, well then I wouldn’t want to ruin it for you by pointing out that the Syrian army is bristling with tanks and weapons bearing Russian serial codes and export documentation now would I?

      Reply
    • Gingerman what is the point in saying what really is going on .There is no point the masses are so brainwashed by what they are told and read its astounding .The US = wars in KOREA VIETNAM YUGOSLAVIA KUWAIT IRAQ LIBYA SYRIA and IRAN are next maybe CHINA and if ye haven’t heard they have nearly entire their naval armada anchored off the coast of china .They started dirty wars in nearly every country in south america and when Hugo Chavez forced the C.I.A out they tried to kill him but failed.Have all these countries needed saving for one reason or another or is it just and the most obvious if people actually took the time to look into it that they invade peoples countries on false pretense put in there own puppet government and strip the country of what ever they are after they go along killing millions along the way it is so obvious it s unbelievable but still ..still people believe their liberty and democracy propaganda 40 yrs of wars and their still the beacon of freedom they must be laughing their asses off at the gullible world .

      Reply
    • @gingerman So you didn’t know that Russia has been shipping arms to the Assad regime all this time? I think you’ve disqualified yourself from having anything to say about the situation until you’ve looked into it a LOT more! The USA is not the only country with a military-industrial complex.

      Reply
    • US vs Russia its on the way ..

      Reply
    • Where do you think they get their tanks gunships and heavy weapons from all the syrian generals were trained in russia

      Reply
    • Russia and China have legal contracts with Syria to supply arms, signed long before the current conflict started.

      The US, on the other hand, is covertly arming terrorists in order to effect yet another regime change in a less than friendly country in the ME. Syria has been on the “Axis of Bullshit” list for over 10 years….. This entire conflict has been started by the US.

      Reply
    • @ Imram, sorry to burst your bubble there but it’s actually Saudi Arabia and Turkey who are supplying weapons and manpower to the FSA. And they are only doing it because nobody will go in and put an end to the crackdown.

      Although I’m sure you’ll find some other way to denounce them nasty yanks and their global empire.

      Reply
    • Ah yes, the good ol Saudis….Nice chaps… And Turkey? Part of NATO aren’t they?

      Most countries aren’t allowed to move weapons to 3rd parties without prior approval of the original supplier.

      Are you sitting there telling me that the US doesn’t have an interest in seeing the removal of the regime in Syria?

      All sides are as bad as eachother, but let’s call a spade a spade ffs

      Reply
    • Jasom

      Reply
    • Why shouldn’t America be helping the rebels and foreign fighters? This is a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia. The US is allied to the Saudis therefor they help the Saudi backed rebels. Makes sense. Just like Assad gets help from Iran. Feel sorry for the people though. Regardless of who wins they lose! Personally I won’t pick sides, Iran and Saudi Arabia are both equally backwards and evil.

      Reply
    • Of course the US should help its allies, but they should stop trying to pass themselves off as saviours of humanity and trying to sugar-coat their actual intentions. Which is the complete removal of any unfriendly regimes in the ME by whatever means necessary.

      Reply

Add New Comment