We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Julian Assange speaking in London in February: the WikiLeaks founder this morning lost an appeal against an extradition warrant to Sweden. Lewis Whyld/PA Wire

Assange loses UK Supreme Court appeal against extradition

But it’s not over yet – the Supreme Court puts a two-week stay on the ruling to allow another defence argument.

THE UNITED KINGDOM’S Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange seeking to block his extradition to Sweden on charges of sexual assault.

The court ruled 5-2 against Assange’s claim that the Swedish public prosecutor was not a ‘judicial authority’, meaning it did not have the legal power to seek the extradition of a person from one EU country to another.

The court ruled that public prosecutions fell under the definition of a judicial authority under the Vienna Convention, which governs the terms under which countries can enter into international agreements, and particularly under its French translation.

The order does not take immediate effect, however: the Supreme Court granted a two-week stay on its ruling after Assange’s lawyers asked for extra time to consider the court’s ruling.

They claimed the arguments in relation to the Vienna Convention had not been made during the Supreme Court’s original hearings, and that Assange therefore did not have the opportunity to respond to such arguments.

The court granted a two-week stay so that Assange’s team could study the court’s written ruling and decide if it wanted to have the case re-opened.

Assange has previously claimed the attempts to have him extradited to Sweden are a front for a potential onward extradition to the United States, which has opposed WikiLeaks’ publication of confidential military logs and diplomatic cables.

Read: Julian Assange: ‘I may be biggest media victim since the McCanns’

More: Julian Assange plans to run for Australian Senate

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.