Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
WHEN AN 87-year-old Illinois grandmother bet a quarter in an Iowa slot machine in 2011, she thought she’d hit it big.
The screen said: “The reels have rolled your way! Bonus Award – $41797550.16.”
Pauline McKee and her daughter excitedly summoned casino employees to collect what they thought was a $41.8 million jackpot.
But state officials later concluded the award was a computer glitch and that the Isle Hotel Casino in Waterloo didn’t have to pay. And the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that McKee didn’t hit any jackpot — no matter what the screen told her.
Her good fortune was actually worth only $1.85 based on how the symbols aligned on the Miss Kitty game, the court said.
Game rules said the maximum award was $10,000 and allowed for no bonus awards, Justice Edward Mansfield wrote for the unanimous seven-member court. The rules and pay table, which were available on a touch screen, amount to a contract between the casino and the player and it doesn’t matter that McKee didn’t read them, he added.
The casino could have been forced into bankruptcy if the decision had gone the other way, said one of its attorneys, Stacey Cormican.
A $41 million payout would amount to about half of the gross revenue the casino generated last year.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site