Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

AP Photo/Jerry Lampen, Pool
Congo

Congo warlord sentenced to jail for using child soldiers

Thomas Lubanga was found guilty of recruiting and using children and sending them to kill and be killed during fighting in the Congo.

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL Court sentenced a Congolese warlord to 14 years in prison today, a watershed moment for the 10-year-old tribunal and a potential landmark in the struggle to protect children during wartime.

Judges found Thomas Lubanga guilty in March of recruiting and using children in his Union of Congolese Patriots militia — sending them to kill and be killed during fighting in Congo’s eastern Ituri region in 2002-2003.

The announcement was the first time the tribunal had sentenced a convicted war criminal.

Vulnerable

Presiding Judge Adrian Fulford said at the sentencing hearing:

The vulnerability of children means they need to be afforded particular protection.

Human rights activists hailed the decision.

“This sentence sends out a stark warning across the world to those engaged in the use of child soldiers that their criminal actions will land them in prison,” said Armel Luhiriri of the Coalition for the ICC, a non-government group that supports the court and its efforts to end impunity for the world’s worst crimes.

Prosecutors had asked for a 30-year sentence, but said they would be willing to cut it to 20 years if Lubanga offered a “genuine apology” to the victims of his crimes. Lubanga did not offer an apology.

No emotion

Wearing a gray suit and tie, Lubanga showed no emotion as Fulford read out the decision. He can appeal his conviction and sentence.

Fulford said that the time Lubanga has served in pretrial detention since March 2006 would be deducted from the sentence.

One of the judges, Odio Benito, issued a separate dissenting opinion, saying the sentence should have been 15 years in recognition of the suffering of victims of harsh punishments and sexual violence.

It was not immediately clear where Lubanga would serve his sentence. The court has no prison cells for holding convicted war criminals, but has deals with seven countries to jail them — Denmark, Serbia, Mali, Austria, Finland, Britain and Belgium.

Fulford gave Lubanga three sentences of 13, 12 and 14 years each, respectively for conscripting, enlisting and using child soldiers, but the sentences are to be served concurrently.

Conscripting involves abducting children and pressing them into military service, while enlisting them can mean they serve voluntarily.

Fulford criticised former chief prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo for not bringing charges of sexual violence against Lubanga or presenting evidence of such crimes at a sentencing hearing last month.

Rights activists say Lubanga’s militia and other warring parties in Ituri engaged in widespread rape.

Cooperative

The judge also praised Lubanga for being “respectful and cooperative” throughout the case despite it twice being held up by prosecutors defying court orders linked to identifying witnesses.

Lubanga’s sister, Angele Zasi, insisted on his innocence.

We (the family) are very disappointed by the judgment of the court. Everyone knows that my brother is innocent of all that they reproach him.

Congo’s Information Minister Lambert Mende said he thought the sentence was not harsh enough but added “it is a punishment and I believe that it will haunt him for the rest of his life.”

- Mike Corder

Read: In first verdict International Criminal Court finds Congo warlord guilty>

Author
Associated Foreign Press
Your Voice
Readers Comments
5
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.