Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Support us today
Not now
Saturday 23 September 2023 Dublin: 14°C
Sasko Lazarov/
# building and property
The EU has shot down claims that Nama gives illegal state aid to developers
Some of Ireland’s biggest developers claimed the ‘bad bank’ had broken the rules.

THE EU HAS found that Nama didn’t breach state aid rules, scuppering a complaint from some of the country’s biggest developers.

In 2015, lawyers representing Michael O’Flynn, Paddy McKillen, David Daly, Pat Crean and Brian McKeown lodged a complaint alleging that Nama distorts competition in the Irish property market.

They said that the State bad-bank did this by granting favourable loan terms to builders who are existing Nama creditors.

It was also claimed that Nama itself benefitted from various illegal state aid measures, including a State guarantee on its funding. However, the European Commission found that Nama didn’t breach its regulations.

It found that the organisation extends new loans to property developers where it is commercially viable to do so.

“Nama has demonstrated that it carries out a robust analysis in each case to decide whether it is more profitable to sell a site directly, or to extend a new loan to develop and then sell the property on the market,” the EU commission said.

“Once the houses or apartments funded by Nama have been developed they are sold at market prices set by independent property experts.

“Therefore, the commission concluded that property developers funded by Nama are not receiving any undue advantage.”


It also found that state support to Nama had already been approved by a 2010 EU commission decision.

NAMA'S Annual Reports Sasko Lazarov / Sasko Lazarov / /

“This concerns in particular the state guarantee on Nama’s funding, Nama’s special powers and tax exemptions that were the subject of the complaint,” the commission said.

“The commission concluded in this regard that Nama has acted in full accordance with the 2010 decision and with all commitments made by the Irish authorities thereunder.
“Other measures that were the subject of the complaint, such as Nama alleged information advantage, do not amount to state aid.”
Lastly, it was found that extending financing to certain building projects where it is commercially viable to do so “is in line with Nama’s objective to obtain the best possible financial return for the state”.

EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said: “We have carefully looked at allegations that Nama’s activities would distort competition in the Irish property development market.

“Our assessment shows that Nama’s activities did not breach EU rules – it has acted as a private operator would have done, and in line with its objective to obtain the best possible financial return for the State and Irish taxpayers.”

Nama released a statement welcoming the EU decision, and added that it is “pressing ahead with its funding programme with a view to maximising the return on viable residential units from sites under the control of its debtors and receivers”.

The decision will likely come as a relief to the government, and was also praised by Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe.

“I welcome the decision in relation to this complaint which now allows Nama to continue to work on maximising the number of housing units that are delivered from sites owned by its debtors and receivers,” he said.

Sign up to our newsletter to receive a regular digest of Fora’s top articles delivered to your inbox.

Written by Paul O’Donoghue and posted on

Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel