We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo. Soldiers at a remembrance ceremony in Glasnevin.

Garda probe under way after 1916 memorial wall vandalised again in Glasnevin

The Necrology Wall bears the names of all those who died as a result of the conflict.

VANDALS HAVE DAMAGED a wall used to commemorate all those who died in the 1916 Easter Rising.

It is the second time that the memorial has been vandalised in recent years, after paint was thrown upon the wall in 2017 in an act described as “callous vandalism”

The Necrology Wall is where the names of all those who died as a result of the conflict during the period 1916 to 1918, in chronological and alphabetical order, are inscribed.

The wall also includes the names of British soldiers who died in the Rising.

Gardaí have started a probe into the latest act of vandalism, where it’s understood some of the names on the wall have been damaged. 

The incident occurred at around 3.40am on Tuesday morning.

A garda spokesperson told “The memorial wall suffered significant damage during the incident. No arrests have been made and investigations are ongoing.”

A spokesperson for Glasnevin Trust said: “Glasnevin Trust can confirm that the Necrology Wall was vandalised at Glasnevin Cemetery during the early hours of Tuesday morning. Glasnevin Trust is currently engaging with the Gardaí on the matter and will not be commenting further at this time.”

Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel