Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The judges of the ICJ, The Hague, Netherlands Alamy Stock Photo
Gaza Genocide case

Israel responds to South African ICJ request for new orders, calling it 'peculiar and improper'

The Court has already issued emergency orders against Israel.

ISRAEL HAS WRITTEN to the International Court of Justice in response to an urgent request made by South Africa this week for the court to impose extra emergency orders on Israel over its conduct in Gaza. 

The Israeli legal team has today described South Africa’s latest request as “highly peculiar and improper”. 

The request was made on Monday in the context of South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the UN court. South Africa alleges that Israel is in violation of the Genocide Convention in multiple ways through its military campaign in Gaza.

The Court has already issued emergency orders against Israel – known as provisional measures – but this week South Africa’s lawyers argued that more were needed after “a significant development” in the conflict, namely the planned invasion and “evacuation”of the southern Gazan city of Rafah, the last refuge for about 1.5 million displaced people. 

The South African request cited a statement from the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu which said he had ordered the Israeli military “to submit to the Cabinet a combined plan for evacuating the population and destroying the (Hamas) battalions”.

Given the dire situation faced by people in Rafah, who have been forced to flee areas further north due to the Israeli invasion, South Africa asked the Court to reassess the situation. 

Israel, however, has responded today by asking the Court to reject the South African request, arguing that the situation in Gaza has not changed since it issued provisional orders three weeks ago. 

It argued that since the invasion of Rafah has not happened yet, the situation in the conflict cannot be said to have changed. 

The Israeli legal team also argued that the request was “highly peculiar and improper” based on a technical reading of the article cited by South Africa, calling the invocation of Article 75 (1) “inapplicable”. 

The Israeli response also reiterated its opinion of the broader genocide case against it, calling it “repugnant” and describing it as an abuse of the ICJ and the Genocide Convention.

Israel is due to submit a report to the ICJ next week to update the judges on how it has acted since the provisional measures were ordered.