This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 17 °C Sunday 9 August, 2020
Advertisement

Lidl ordered to pay €17k after demoting manager to clerk following misconduct claims

James Murphy had been working for the company for 16 years.

Image: Sam Boal via RollingNews.ie

LIDL IRELAND HAS been ordered to pay €17,000 compensation for demoting a former logistics manager at a distribution hub to a desk clerk post.

The Labour Court has ordered German discount giant to pay James Murphy the €17,000 after finding that the decision to demote him was “disproportionate and unfair”.

Lidl demoted Murphy to the desk job after making a finding of gross misconduct concerning him allegedly concealing a three-litre carton of milk with the intention of stealing it from Lidl and allegedly falsifying work hours over a four week period.

Lidl initially imposed a final written warning sanction on Murphy and opted not to dismiss him due to his unblemished record with the company over 16 years.

The decision to demote Murphy to the desk job was made at appeal stage which was only brought about by Murphy appealing  internally the final written warning sanction.

Deputy Chairman of the Labour Court, Alan Haugh found that Lidl has not justified its decision to drastically increase, at the appeal stage, the original sanction imposed.

Murphy had been promoted on five occasions to rise to the post of Deputy Logistics Manager (DLM) at Lidl’s Regional Distribution Centre in Newbridge, County Kildare.

Murphy stated that he was extremely happy with his employment and had no intention of seeking alternative employment for the remainder of his working life.

As a DLM, Murphy was employed on night shifts, was a keyholder to the premises which contained several million euro of stock at all times and was often the only manager on duty.

However, in January 2019, Lidl carried out a standard review of DLM average working hours.

A company investigation found that Murphy had knowingly falsified his hours over a four-week period in December 2018 and that a 3-litre carton of milk was removed on a trolley from the company premises on December 22nd. 2018.

In response, Murphy said that had lost both of his swipe cards and hadn’t taken the necessary steps to inform the company of this nor had he applied for replacement cards. 

He admitted that he had manually recorded his working hours during December 2018.

Murphy made no admission of having removed any item from the trolley at any stage.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

Lidl imposed a final written warning sanction on Murphy and declined to impose a sanction of dismissal, having regard to the worker’s “years of service within the business and unblemished record to date”.

The Lidl decision maker recommended that Murphy be moved to an alternative DLM role in a different department where he would be subject to greater supervision.

Murphy lodged an appeal and confined the appeal to the second allegation that he had concealed a three-litre carton of milk with the intention of stealing it. 

However, Regional Director, Niall Murray upped the sanction on appeal on Murphy and decided “to demote you to a Desk Clerk position in the Warehouse, with immediate effect. This decision is final”.

The difference in salary between the two roles is €17,000 per annum.

Murray made his ruling “due to the fundamental breakdown of trust and the concerns that I have in relation to you remaining in a managerial role”.

Lidl stated that if Murphy – out on sick leave for more than six months up to the time of the Labour Court hearing - were to apply for promotion in the future, there would be no bar to him doing so.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Gordon Deegan

Read next:

COMMENTS