Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Updated at 11.12pm
THE MATER HOSPITAL has ‘absolutely refuted’ suggestions that it held a multi-million euro pension fund on behalf of the Central Remedial Clinic (CRC) that didn’t exist, and say it is superannuation scheme.
It follows a heated exchange in the Public Accounts committee this afternoon in which former CRC chief executive Paul Kiely said that the organisation is paying the hospital €660,000 a year to administer the fund, although he was unaware of whether it actually existed.
In a statement this evening, the Mater Hospital explained that this fund is part of the Voluntary Hospital Superannuation Scheme.
They said that it is “in line with Public Sector pension policy, whereby all pensions are funded from current revenues, as is the case with all Public Hospitals”.
The statement explained the arrangement is due to a legacy issue which first arose in the 1970′s.
The CRC was unable to receive funds from the Department of Health as it was not classed as a hospital.
The decision was made to route funds through the nearest hospital “in order to overcome this difficulty”.
However, the hospital says this arrangement changed in the early 2000′s
The Department of Health altered this approach and decided to no longer pay its CRC funding though the Mater Hospital.
However, the CRC staff from that time continued to hold their membership of the Voluntary Hospital’s Superannuation scheme as there was no alternative public sector pension scheme available to them.
This scheme has continued for those CRC staff members, currently numbering 181
The Mater Hospital have also requested that Paul Kiely correct “his earlier inaccurate reference”.
Originally posted at 8.10pm
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site