We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo dated 14/2/1981 of the scene of a fire at the Stardust nightclub where 48 people died. PA/PA Wire/Press Association Images
State Papers

RTÉ accused of "undermining" Stardust Tribunal in 1981

The State papers, released under the 30-year rule, also show that the owners of the Stardust asked the Government to pay their legal fees for appearing at a tribunal of inquiry into the tragedy.

THE NEWLY-RELEASED 1981 State papers show that a senior advisor to the then-Taoiseach Charles Haughey accused RTÉ  of undermining the Stardust Tribunal.

The advisor said they did this by airing an in-depth report into the dancehall tragedy, the State papers reveal.

The report was to be aired on the Today Tonight programme two days after the disaster, which took place on Valentine’s night in Artane.

The papers also show that the family who owned the Stardust, the Butterlys, asked the government to pay for their costs of appearing at a tribunal of inquiry into the tragedy.

The government said it would not pay the fees, as it would be “inappropriate”.

Read: Archives show Bobby Sands “offered to end hunger strike”>

In pictures: State papers reveal new details about hunger strikes and Stardust>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.